Document Open Access Logo

04351 Abstracts Collection – Spatial Representation: Discrete vs. Continuous Computational Models

Authors Ralph Kopperman, Prakash Panangaden, Michael B. Smyth, Dieter Spreen, Julian Webster



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

DagSemProc.04351.1.pdf
  • Filesize: 249 kB
  • 24 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Ralph Kopperman
Prakash Panangaden
Michael B. Smyth
Dieter Spreen
Julian Webster

Cite AsGet BibTex

Ralph Kopperman, Prakash Panangaden, Michael B. Smyth, Dieter Spreen, and Julian Webster. 04351 Abstracts Collection – Spatial Representation: Discrete vs. Continuous Computational Models. In Spatial Representation: Discrete vs. Continuous Computational Models. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 4351, pp. 1-24, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2005)
https://doi.org/10.4230/DagSemProc.04351.1

Abstract

From 22.08.04 to 27.08.04, the Dagstuhl Seminar 04351 ``Spatial Representation: Discrete vs. Continuous Computational Models'' was held in the International Conference and Research Center (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available.
Keywords
  • Domain theory
  • formal topology
  • constructive topology
  • domain representation
  • space-time
  • quantum gravity
  • inverse limit construction
  • matroid geometry
  • descriptive set theory
  • Borel hierarchy
  • Hausdorff difference hierarchy
  • Wadge degree partial metric
  • fractafold
  • region geometry
  • oriented projective geometry

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail