09411 Abstracts Collection – Interaction versus Automation: The two Faces of Deduction

Ball, Thomas; Giesl, Jürgen; Hähnle, Reiner; Nipkow, Tobias

doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.09411.1

Document

09411 Abstracts Collection – Interaction versus Automation: The two Faces of Deduction

Authors Thomas Ball, Jürgen Giesl, Reiner Hähnle, Tobias Nipkow

Part of: Volume: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 9411
Part of: Series: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license
Publication Date: 2010-03-09

PDF

File

PDF

DagSemProc.09411.1.pdf

Filesize: 204 kB
18 pages

Document Identifiers

DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.09411.1
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-25032

Subject Classification

Keywords

Formal Logic
Deduction
Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Access Statistics
Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)

0

PDF Downloads

0

Metadata Views

Abstract

From 04.10. to 09.10.2009, the Dagstuhl Seminar 09411 
``Interaction versus Automation: The two Faces of Deduction'' was held
in Schloss Dagstuhl~--~Leibniz Center for Informatics.
During the seminar, several participants presented their current
research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of
the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of
seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section
describes the seminar topics and goals in general.
Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available.

Cite As Get BibTex

Thomas Ball, Jürgen Giesl, Reiner Hähnle, and Tobias Nipkow. 09411 Abstracts Collection – Interaction versus Automation: The two Faces of Deduction. In Interaction versus Automation: The two Faces of Deduction. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 9411, pp. 1-18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2010) https://doi.org/10.4230/DagSemProc.09411.1

Author Details

Thomas Ball

Jürgen Giesl

Reiner Hähnle

Tobias Nipkow

Questions / Remarks / Feedback

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail