Oblivious Algorithms for the Max-kAND Problem

Author Noah G. Singer



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2023.15.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.94 MB
  • 19 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Noah G. Singer
  • Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Madhu Sudan and Santhoshini Velusamy for generous feedback and comments on the manuscript; Pravesh Kothari and Peter Manohar for helpful discussions; and anonymous reviewers at APPROX whose feedback helped improve the presentation in the paper.

Cite AsGet BibTex

Noah G. Singer. Oblivious Algorithms for the Max-kAND Problem. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 275, pp. 15:1-15:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2023.15

Abstract

Motivated by recent works on streaming algorithms for constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), we define and analyze oblivious algorithms for the Max-kAND problem. This is a class of simple, combinatorial algorithms which round each variable with probability depending only on a quantity called the variable’s bias. Our definition generalizes a class of algorithms defined by Feige and Jozeph (Algorithmica '15) for Max-DICUT, a special case of Max-2AND. For each oblivious algorithm, we design a so-called factor-revealing linear program (LP) which captures its worst-case instance, generalizing one of Feige and Jozeph for Max-DICUT. Then, departing from their work, we perform a fully explicit analysis of these (infinitely many!) LPs. In particular, we show that for all k, oblivious algorithms for Max-kAND provably outperform a special subclass of algorithms we call "superoblivious" algorithms. Our result has implications for streaming algorithms: Generalizing the result for Max-DICUT of Saxena, Singer, Sudan, and Velusamy (SODA'23), we prove that certain separation results hold between streaming models for infinitely many CSPs: for every k, O(log n)-space sketching algorithms for Max-kAND known to be optimal in o(√n)-space can be beaten in (a) O(log n)-space under a random-ordering assumption, and (b) O(n^{1-1/k} D^{1/k}) space under a maximum-degree-D assumption. Even in the previously-known case of Max-DICUT, our analytic proof gives a fuller, computer-free picture of these separation results.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Approximation algorithms analysis
  • Theory of computation → Streaming, sublinear and near linear time algorithms
  • Theory of computation → Discrete optimization
Keywords
  • streaming algorithm
  • approximation algorithm
  • constraint satisfaction problem (CSP)
  • factor-revealing linear program

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Paola Alimonti. New local search approximation techniques for maximum generalized satisfiability problems. Information Processing Letters, 57(3):151-158, February 1996. Conference version in CIAC 1994. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0190(95)00196-4.
  2. Paola Alimonti. Non-oblivious local search for MAX 2-CCSP with application to MAX DICUT. In Rolf H. Möhring, editor, Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 2-14. Springer, 1997. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0024483.
  3. Sepehr Assadi, Gillat Kol, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, and Huacheng Yu. Multi-Pass Graph Streaming Lower Bounds for Cycle Counting, MAX-CUT, Matching Size, and Other Problems. In 2020 IEEE 61st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2020, Virtual, November 16-19, 2020), pages 354-364, virtual, November 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS46700.2020.00041.
  4. Sepehr Assadi and Vishvajeet N. Graph streaming lower bounds for parameter estimation and property testing via a streaming XOR lemma. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2021, Virtual, June 21-25, 2021), pages 612-625, virtual, June 2021. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3406325.3451110.
  5. Amotz Bar-Noy and Michael Lampis. Online maximum directed cut. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 24(1):52-64, July 2012. Conference version in ISAAC 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-010-9318-6.
  6. Nico Bertram, Jonas Ellert, and Johannes Fischer. A Parallel Framework for Approximate Max-Dicut in Partitionable Graphs. In Christian Schulz and Bora Uçar, editors, 20th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2022, Heidelberg, Germany, July 25-27, 2022), volume 233 of LIPIcs, pages 10:1-10:15, Heidelberg, Germany, 2022. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2022.10.
  7. Joanna Boyland, Michael Hwang, Tarun Prasad, Noah Singer, and Santhoshini Velusamy. On sketching approximations for symmetric Boolean CSPs. In Amit Chakrabarti and Chaitanya Swamy, editors, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX 2022, Virtual, September 19-21, 2022), volume 245 of LIPIcs, pages 38:1-38:23, virtual, July 2022. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2022.38.
  8. Moses Charikar, Konstantin Makarychev, and Yury Makarychev. Near-optimal algorithms for maximum constraint satisfaction problems. ACM Transactions on Algorithms, 5(3):1-14, July 2009. Conference version in SODA 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1541885.1541893.
  9. Lijie Chen, Gillat Kol, Dmitry Paramonov, Raghuvansh Saxena, Zhao Song, and Huacheng Yu. Towards Multi-Pass Streaming Lower Bounds for Optimal Approximation of Max-Cut. In Proceedings of the 2023 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 2023. Google Scholar
  10. Chi-Ning Chou, Alexander Golovnev, Amirbehshad Shahrasbi, Madhu Sudan, and Santhoshini Velusamy. Sketching Approximability of (Weak) Monarchy Predicates. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX 2022, Virtual, September 19-21, 2022), volume 245 of LIPIcs, pages 35:1-35:17, virtual, 2022. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2022.35.
  11. Chi-Ning Chou, Alexander Golovnev, Madhu Sudan, Ameya Velingker, and Santhoshini Velusamy. Linear Space Streaming Lower Bounds for Approximating CSPs. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2022, Rome, Italy, June 20-24, 2022), Rome, Italy, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3519935.3519983.
  12. Chi-Ning Chou, Alexander Golovnev, Madhu Sudan, and Santhoshini Velusamy. Approximability of all Boolean CSPs with linear sketches. arXiv, February 2021. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.12351v7.
  13. Chi-Ning Chou, Alexander Golovnev, Madhu Sudan, and Santhoshini Velusamy. Approximability of all finite CSPs with linear sketches. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2021, Denver, CO, USA, February 7-10, 2022), Denver, CO, USA, 2021. IEEE Computer Society. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS52979.2021.00117.
  14. Chi-Ning Chou, Alexander Golovnev, and Santhoshini Velusamy. Optimal Streaming Approximations for all Boolean Max-2CSPs and Max-kSAT. In 2020 IEEE 61st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2020, Virtual, November 16-19, 2020), pages 330-341, virtual, November 2020. IEEE Computer Society. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS46700.2020.00039.
  15. Lars Engebretsen and Jonas Holmerin. More efficient queries in PCPs for NP and improved approximation hardness of maximum CSP. Random Structures and Algorithms, 33(4):497-514, December 2008. Conference version in STACS 2005. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/rsa.20226.
  16. Uriel Feige and Michel X. Goemans. Approximating the value of two prover proof systems, with applications to MAX 2SAT and MAX DICUT. In Proceedings of the 3rd Israel Symposium on the Theory of Computing and Systems (ISTCS 2003, January 4-6, 1995), pages 182-189. IEEE Computer Society, 1995. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTCS.1995.377033.
  17. Uriel Feige and Shlomo Jozeph. Oblivious Algorithms for the Maximum Directed Cut Problem. Algorithmica, 71(2):409-428, February 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-013-9806-z.
  18. Michel X. Goemans and David P. Williamson. Improved approximation algorithms for maximum cut and satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming. Journal of the ACM, 42(6):1115-1145, November 1995. Conference version in STOC 1994. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/227683.227684.
  19. Venkatesan Guruswami and Runzhou Tao. Streaming Hardness of Unique Games. In Dimitris Achlioptas and László A. Végh, editors, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX 2019, Cambridge, MA, USA, September 20-22, 2019), volume 145 of LIPIcs, pages 5:1-5:12, Cambridge, MA, USA, September 2019. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2019.5.
  20. Venkatesan Guruswami, Ameya Velingker, and Santhoshini Velusamy. Streaming Complexity of Approximating Max 2CSP and Max Acyclic Subgraph. In Klaus Jansen, José D. P. Rolim, David Williamson, and Santosh S. Vempala, editors, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX 2017, Berkeley, CA, USA, August 16-18, 2017), volume 81 of LIPIcs, pages 8:1-8:19, Berkeley, CA, USA, August 2017. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2017.8.
  21. Eran Halperin and Uri Zwick. Combinatorial approximation algorithms for the maximum directed cut problem. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2001, Washington, DC, USA, January 7-9, 2001), pages 1-7, Washington, DC, USA, 2001. Google Scholar
  22. Gustav Hast. Approximating Max kCSP Using Random Restrictions. In Klaus Jansen, Sanjeev Khanna, José D. P. Rolim, and Dana Ron, editors, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX 2004, Cambridge, MA, USA, August 22-24, 2004), volume 3122 of LNCS, pages 151-162, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004. Springer. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27821-4_14.
  23. Gustav Hast. Approximating Max kCSP - Outperforming a Random Assignment with Almost a Linear Factor. In Luís Caires, Giuseppe F. Italiano, Luís Monteiro, Catuscia Palamidessi, and Moti Yung, editors, Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2005, July 11-15, 2005), volume 3580 of LNCS, pages 956-968. Springer, 2005. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/11523468_77.
  24. Johan Håstad. Some optimal inapproximability results. Journal of the ACM, 48(4):798-859, 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/502090.502098.
  25. Kamal Jain, Mohammad Mahdian, Evangelos Markakis, Amin Saberi, and Vijay V. Vazirani. Greedy facility location algorithms analyzed using dual fitting with factor-revealing LP. Journal of the ACM, 50(6):795-824, November 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/950620.950621.
  26. Michael Kapralov, Sanjeev Khanna, and Madhu Sudan. Streaming lower bounds for approximating MAX-CUT. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2015, San Diego, California, USA, January 4-6, 2015), pages 1263-1282, San Diego, California, USA, January 2015. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611973730.84.
  27. Michael Kapralov, Sanjeev Khanna, Madhu Sudan, and Ameya Velingker. (1 + ω(1))-approximation to MAX-CUT requires linear space. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2017, Barcelona, Spain, January 16-19, 2017), pages 1703-1722, Barcelona, Spain, January 2017. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. URL: https://doi.org/10.5555/3039686.3039798.
  28. Michael Kapralov and Dmitry Krachun. An optimal space lower bound for approximating MAX-CUT. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2019, Phoenix, AZ, USA, June 23-26, 2019), pages 277-288, Phoenix, AZ, USA, June 2019. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313276.3316364.
  29. Dmitry Kogan and Robert Krauthgamer. Sketching cuts in graphs and hypergraphs. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS 2015, Rehovot, Israel, January 11-13, 2015), pages 367-376, Rehovot, Israel, 2015. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2688073.2688093.
  30. Michael Lewin, Dror Livnat, and Uri Zwick. Improved Rounding Techniques for the MAX 2-SAT and MAX DI-CUT Problems. In William J. Cook and Andreas S. Schulz, editors, Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, pages 67-82, 2002. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47867-1_6.
  31. Mohammad Mahdian and Qiqi Yan. Online bipartite matching with random arrivals: An approach based on strongly factor-revealing LPs. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2011, San Jose, CA, USA, June 6-8, 2011), pages 597-606, San Jose, CA, USA, June 2011. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1993636.1993716.
  32. Jiří Matoušek and Bernd Gärtner. Understanding and Using Linear Programming. Universitext. Springer, Berlin; New York, 2007. Google Scholar
  33. Shiro Matuura and Tomomi Matsui. 0.863-Approximation Algorithm for MAX DICUT. In Michel Goemans, Klaus Jansen, José D. P. Rolim, and Luca Trevisan, editors, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX 2001, Berkeley, CA, USA, August 18-20, 2001), volume 2129 of LNCS, pages 138-146, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001. Springer. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44666-4_17.
  34. Alex Samorodnitsky and Luca Trevisan. A PCP characterization of NP with optimal amortized query complexity. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2000, Portland, OR, USA, May 21-23, 2000), pages 191-199, Portland, OR, USA, 2000. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/335305.335329.
  35. Alex Samorodnitsky and Luca Trevisan. Gowers Uniformity, Influence of Variables, and PCPs. SIAM Journal on Computing, 39(1):323-360, January 2009. Conference version in STOC 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/070681612.
  36. Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Noah Singer, Madhu Sudan, and Santhoshini Velusamy. Improved streaming algorithms for Maximum Directed Cut via smoothed snapshots. In 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, 2023. IEEE Computing Society. To appear. Google Scholar
  37. Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Noah Singer, Madhu Sudan, and Santhoshini Velusamy. Streaming complexity of CSPs with randomly ordered constraints. In Proceedings of the 2023 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2023, Florence, Italy, January 22-25, 2023), Florence, Italy, January 2023. Google Scholar
  38. Noah Singer. On Streaming Approximation Algorithms for Constraint Satisfaction Problems. Undergraduate thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, March 2022. Google Scholar
  39. Noah Singer, Madhu Sudan, and Santhoshini Velusamy. Streaming approximation resistance of every ordering CSP. In Mary Wootters and Laura Sanità, editors, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX 2021, Virtual, August 16-18, 2021), volume 207 of LIPIcs, pages 17:1-17:19, virtual, July 2021. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2021.17.
  40. David Steurer. Fast SDP Algorithms for Constraint Satisfaction Problems. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2010, Austin, TX, USA, January 17-19, 2010), pages 684-697, Austin, TX, USA, January 2010. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611973075.56.
  41. Madhu Sudan. Streaming and Sketching Complexity of CSPs: A survey (Invited Talk). In Mikołaj Bojańczyk, Emanuela Merelli, and David P. Woodruff, editors, 49th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, volume 229 of LIPIcs, pages 5:1-5:20. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2022.5.
  42. Madhu Sudan and Luca Trevisan. Probabilistically checkable proofs with low amortized query complexity. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (SFCS 1998, Palo Alto, CA, USA, November 8-11, 1998), pages 18-27, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1998. IEEE Computer Society. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1998.743425.
  43. Luca Trevisan. Parallel Approximation Algorithms by Positive Linear Programming. Algorithmica, 21(1):72-88, May 1998. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00009209.
  44. Luca Trevisan. Recycling queries in PCPs and in linearity tests. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 1998, Dallas, Texas, USA, May 24-26, 1998), pages 299-308, Dallas, Texas, USA, 1998. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/276698.276769.
  45. Luca Trevisan, Gregory B. Sorkin, Madhu Sudan, and David P. Williamson. Gadgets, Approximation, and Linear Programming. SIAM Journal on Computing, 29(6):2074-2097, January 2000. Conference version in FOCS 1996. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/S0097539797328847.
  46. Zhenning Zhang, Donglei Du, Chenchen Wu, Dachuan Xu, and Dongmei Zhang. A spectral partitioning algorithm for maximum directed cut problem. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 42(3):373-395, October 2021. Conference version in COCOA 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-018-0369-4.
  47. Uri Zwick. Approximation algorithms for constraint satisfaction problems involving at most three variables per constraint. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 1998, San Francisco, CA, USA, January 25-27, 1998), pages 201-210, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1998. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.5555/314613.314701.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail