This paper presents a range of expressiveness and complexity results for the specification, computation, and verification of Nash equilibria in multi-player non-zero-sum concurrent games in which players have goals expressed as temporal logic formulae. Our results are based on a novel approach to the characterisation of equilibria in such games: a semantic characterisation based on winning strategies and memoryful reasoning. This characterisation allows us to obtain a number of other results relating to the analysis of equilibrium properties in temporal logic. We show that, up to bisimilarity, reasoning about Nash equilibria in multi-player non-zero-sum concurrent games can be done in ATL^* and that constructing equilibrium strategy profiles in such games can be done in 2EXPTIME using finite-memory strategies. We also study two simpler cases, two-player games and sequential games, and show that the specification of equilibria in the latter setting can be obtained in a temporal logic that is weaker than ATL^*. Based on these results, we settle a few open problems, put forward new logical characterisations of equilibria, and provide improved answers and alternative solutions to a number of questions.
@InProceedings{gutierrez_et_al:LIPIcs.CONCUR.2015.268, author = {Gutierrez, Julian and Harrenstein, Paul and Wooldridge, Michael}, title = {{Expresiveness and Complexity Results for Strategic Reasoning}}, booktitle = {26th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2015)}, pages = {268--282}, series = {Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)}, ISBN = {978-3-939897-91-0}, ISSN = {1868-8969}, year = {2015}, volume = {42}, editor = {Aceto, Luca and de Frutos Escrig, David}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik}, address = {Dagstuhl, Germany}, URL = {https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2015.268}, URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-53802}, doi = {10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2015.268}, annote = {Keywords: Temporal logic, Nash equilibrium, game models, formal verification} }
Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing