Document Open Access Logo

Brief Announcement: BatchBoost: Universal Batching for Concurrent Data Structures

Authors Vitaly Aksenov , Michael Anoprenko, Alexander Fedorov , Michael Spear

PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.DISC.2023.35.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.61 MB
  • 7 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Vitaly Aksenov
  • City, University of London, UK
  • ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia
Michael Anoprenko
  • Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France
Alexander Fedorov
  • IST Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria
Michael Spear
  • Lehigh University, Betlehem, PA, USA

Cite AsGet BibTex

Vitaly Aksenov, Michael Anoprenko, Alexander Fedorov, and Michael Spear. Brief Announcement: BatchBoost: Universal Batching for Concurrent Data Structures. In 37th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 281, pp. 35:1-35:7, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2023.35

Abstract

Batching is a technique that stores multiple keys/values in each node of a data structure. In sequential search data structures, batching reduces latency by reducing the number of cache misses and shortening the chain of pointers to dereference. Applying batching to concurrent data structures is challenging, because it is difficult to maintain the search property and keep contention low in the presence of batching. In this paper, we present a general methodology for leveraging batching in concurrent search data structures, called BatchBoost. BatchBoost builds a search data structure from distinct "data" and "index" layers. The data layer’s purpose is to store a batch of key/value pairs in each of its nodes. The index layer uses an unmodified concurrent search data structure to route operations to a position in the data layer that is "close" to where the corresponding key should exist. The requirements on the index and data layers are low: with minimal effort, we were able to compose three highly scalable concurrent search data structures based on three original data structures as the index layers with a batched version of the Lazy List as the data layer. The resulting BatchBoost data structures provide significant performance improvements over their original counterparts.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Computing methodologies → Concurrent algorithms
Keywords
  • Concurrency
  • Synchronization
  • Locality

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
    0
    Metadata Views

References

  1. Abseil b-tree containers. URL: https://abseil.io/about/design/btree.
  2. Maya Arbel-Raviv and Trevor Brown. Harnessing epoch-based reclamation for efficient range queries. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 53(1):14-27, 2018. Google Scholar
  3. Dmitry Basin, Edward Bortnikov, Anastasia Braginsky, Guy Golan-Gueta, Eshcar Hillel, Idit Keidar, and Moshe Sulamy. Kiwi: A key-value map for scalable real-time analytics. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming, pages 357-369, 2017. Google Scholar
  4. Rudolf Bayer and Edward McCreight. Organization and maintenance of large ordered indices. In Proceedings of the 1970 ACM SIGFIDET (Now SIGMOD) Workshop on Data Description, Access and Control, pages 107-141, 1970. Google Scholar
  5. Anastasia Braginsky and Erez Petrank. Locality-conscious lock-free linked lists. In Distributed Computing and Networking: 12th International Conference, ICDCN 2011, Bangalore, India, January 2-5, 2011. Proceedings 12, pages 107-118. Springer, 2011. Google Scholar
  6. Anastasia Braginsky and Erez Petrank. A Lock-Free B+tree. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2012. Google Scholar
  7. Nathan G Bronson, Jared Casper, Hassan Chafi, and Kunle Olukotun. A practical concurrent binary search tree. ACM Sigplan Notices, 45(5):257-268, 2010. Google Scholar
  8. Trevor Brown and Hillel Avni. Range queries in non-blocking k-ary search trees. In Principles of Distributed Systems: 16th International Conference, OPODIS 2012, Rome, Italy, December 18-20, 2012. Proceedings 16, pages 31-45. Springer, 2012. Google Scholar
  9. Trevor Brown, Aleksandar Prokopec, and Dan Alistarh. Non-blocking interpolation search trees with doubly-logarithmic running time. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming, pages 276-291, 2020. Google Scholar
  10. Irina Calciu, Hammurabi Mendes, and Maurice Herlihy. The adaptive priority queue with elimination and combining. In Distributed Computing: 28th International Symposium, DISC 2014, Austin, TX, USA, October 12-15, 2014. Proceedings 28, pages 406-420. Springer, 2014. Google Scholar
  11. Jiwon Choe, Andrew Crotty, Tali Moreshet, Maurice Herlihy, and R Iris Bahar. Hybrids: Cache-conscious concurrent data structures for near-memory processing architectures. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures, pages 321-332, 2022. Google Scholar
  12. Panagiota Fatourou, Elias Papavasileiou, and Eric Ruppert. Persistent non-blocking binary search trees supporting wait-free range queries. In The 31st ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures, pages 275-286, 2019. Google Scholar
  13. Keir Fraser. Practical lock-freedom. Technical report, University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory, 2004. Google Scholar
  14. Vincent Gramoli. More than you ever wanted to know about synchronization: Synchrobench, measuring the impact of the synchronization on concurrent algorithms. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming, pages 1-10, 2015. Google Scholar
  15. Steve Heller, Maurice Herlihy, Victor Luchangco, Mark Moir, William N Scherer, and Nir Shavit. A lazy concurrent list-based set algorithm. In Principles of Distributed Systems: 9th International Conference, OPODIS 2005, Pisa, Italy, December 12-14, 2005, Revised Selected Papers 9, pages 3-16. Springer, 2006. Google Scholar
  16. Kevin Hsieh, Eiman Ebrahimi, Gwangsun Kim, Niladrish Chatterjee, Mike O'Connor, Nandita Vijaykumar, Onur Mutlu, and Stephen W Keckler. Transparent offloading and mapping (tom) enabling programmer-transparent near-data processing in gpu systems. ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News, 44(3):204-216, 2016. Google Scholar
  17. Justin J Levandoski, David B Lomet, and Sudipta Sengupta. The bw-tree: A b-tree for new hardware platforms. In 2013 IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 302-313. IEEE, 2013. Google Scholar
  18. Aravind Natarajan and Neeraj Mittal. Fast concurrent lock-free binary search trees. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Principles and practice of parallel programming, pages 317-328, 2014. Google Scholar
  19. Kenneth Platz, Neeraj Mittal, and S. Venkatesan. Concurrent Unrolled Skiplist. In Proceedings of the 39th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Dallas, TX, July 2019. Google Scholar
  20. Anastasiia Postnikova, Nikita Koval, Giorgi Nadiradze, and Dan Alistarh. Multi-queues can be state-of-the-art priority schedulers. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming, pages 353-367, 2022. Google Scholar
  21. Matthew Rodriguez, Ahmed Hassan, and Michael Spear. Exploiting locality in scalable ordered maps. In 2021 IEEE 41st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), pages 998-1008. IEEE, 2021. Google Scholar
  22. Anubhav Srivastava and Trevor Brown. Elimination (a, b)-trees with fast, durable updates. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming, pages 416-430, 2022. Google Scholar
  23. Ziqi Wang, Andrew Pavlo, Hyeontaek Lim, Viktor Leis, Huanchen Zhang, Michael Kaminsky, and David G Andersen. Building a bw-tree takes more than just buzz words. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data, pages 473-488, 2018. Google Scholar
  24. Yuanhao Wei, Naama Ben-David, Guy E Blelloch, Panagiota Fatourou, Eric Ruppert, and Yihan Sun. Constant-time snapshots with applications to concurrent data structures. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming, pages 31-46, 2021. Google Scholar
  25. Chaoran Yang and John Mellor-Crummey. A Wait-Free Queue as Fast as Fetch-and-Add. SIGPLAN Notices, 51(8), February 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3016078.2851168.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact