An effective way to increase the timing predictability of multicore platforms is to use non-preemptive scheduling. It reduces preemption and job migration overheads, avoids intra-core cache interference, and improves the accuracy of worst-case execution time (WCET) estimates. However, existing schedulability tests for global non-preemptive multiprocessor scheduling are pessimistic, especially when applied to periodic workloads. This paper reduces this pessimism by introducing a new type of sufficient schedulability analysis that is based on an exploration of the space of possible schedules using concise abstractions and state-pruning techniques. Specifically, we analyze the schedulability of non-preemptive job sets (with bounded release jitter and execution time variation) scheduled by a global job-level fixed-priority (JLFP) scheduling algorithm upon an identical multicore platform. The analysis yields a lower bound on the best-case response-time (BCRT) and an upper bound on the worst-case response time (WCRT) of the jobs. In an empirical evaluation with randomly generated workloads, we show that the method scales to 30 tasks, a hundred thousand jobs (per hyperperiod), and up to 9 cores.
@InProceedings{nasri_et_al:LIPIcs.ECRTS.2018.9, author = {Nasri, Mitra and Nelissen, Geoffrey and Brandenburg, Bj\"{o}rn B.}, title = {{A Response-Time Analysis for Non-Preemptive Job Sets under Global Scheduling}}, booktitle = {30th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2018)}, pages = {9:1--9:23}, series = {Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)}, ISBN = {978-3-95977-075-0}, ISSN = {1868-8969}, year = {2018}, volume = {106}, editor = {Altmeyer, Sebastian}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik}, address = {Dagstuhl, Germany}, URL = {https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2018.9}, URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-89941}, doi = {10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2018.9}, annote = {Keywords: global multiprocessor scheduling, schedulability analysis, non-preemptive tasks, worst-case response time, best-case response time} }
Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing