Document Open Access Logo

A Clustering-Based Framework for Individual Travel Behaviour Change Detection

Authors Ye Hong , Yanan Xin , Henry Martin , Dominik Bucher , Martin Raubal



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.GIScience.2021.II.4.pdf
  • Filesize: 7.65 MB
  • 15 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Ye Hong
  • Institute of Cartography and Geoinformation, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Yanan Xin
  • Institute of Cartography and Geoinformation, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Henry Martin
  • Institute of Cartography and Geoinformation, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
  • Institute of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence (IARAI), Austria
Dominik Bucher
  • Institute of Cartography and Geoinformation, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Martin Raubal
  • Institute of Cartography and Geoinformation, ETH Zurich, Switzerland

Cite AsGet BibTex

Ye Hong, Yanan Xin, Henry Martin, Dominik Bucher, and Martin Raubal. A Clustering-Based Framework for Individual Travel Behaviour Change Detection. In 11th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2021) - Part II. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 208, pp. 4:1-4:15, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.GIScience.2021.II.4

Abstract

The emergence of passively and continuously recorded movement data offers new opportunities to study the long-term change of individual travel behaviour from data-driven perspectives. This study proposes a clustering-based framework to identify travel behaviour patterns and detect potential change periods on the individual level. First, we extract important trips that depict individual characteristic movement. Then, considering trip mode, trip distance, and trip duration as travel behaviour dimensions, we measure the similarities of trips and group them into clusters using hierarchical clustering. The trip clusters represent dimensions of travel behaviours, and the change of their relative proportions over time reflect the development of travel preferences. We use two different methods to detect changes in travel behaviour patterns: the Herfindahl-Hirschman index-based method and the sliding window-based method. The framework is tested using data from a large-scale longitudinal GPS tracking data study in which participants had access to a Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) offer. The methods successfully identify significant travel behaviour changes for users. Moreover, we analyse the impact of the MaaS offer on individual travel behaviours with the obtained change information. The proposed framework for behaviour change detection provides valuable insights for travel demand management and evaluating people’s reactions to sustainable mobility options.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Information systems → Geographic information systems
  • Information systems → Clustering
  • Applied computing → Transportation
Keywords
  • Human mobility
  • Travel behaviour
  • Change detection
  • Trip clustering

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Laura Alessandretti, Ulf Aslak, and Sune Lehmann. The scales of human mobility. Nature, 587(7834):402-407, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2909-1.
  2. Laura Alessandretti, Piotr Sapiezynski, Vedran Sekara, Sune Lehmann, and Andrea Baronchelli. Evidence for a conserved quantity in human mobility. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(7):485-491, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0364-x.
  3. Kay W Axhausen. Definition Of Movement and Activity For Transport Modelling. In Handbook of Transport Modelling, volume 1, pages 329-343. Elsevier, 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/9780857245670-016.
  4. Jushan Bai and Pierre Perron. Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(1):1-22, 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.659.
  5. J.P.G. van Brakel. Robust peak detection algorithm (using z-scores), 2019. URL: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22583391/peak-signal-detection-in-realtime-timeseries-data.
  6. Dominik Bucher, Henry Martin, Jannik Hamper, Atefeh Jaleh, Henrik Becker, Pengxiang Zhao, and Martin Raubal. Exploring Factors that Influence Individuals’ Choice Between Internal Combustion Engine Cars and Electric Vehicles. AGILE: GIScience Series, 1:1-23, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-1-2-2020.
  7. Varun Chandola, Arindam Banerjee, and Vipin Kumar. Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 41(3):1-58, 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1541880.1541882.
  8. Jie Chen, ZhongCheng Wu, and Jun Zhang. Driver identification based on hidden feature extraction by using adaptive nonnegativity-constrained autoencoder. Applied Soft Computing, 74:1-9, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.09.030.
  9. MC De Haas, CE Scheepers, LWJ Harms, and M Kroesen. Travel pattern transitions: Applying latent transition analysis within the mobility biographies framework. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 107:140-151, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.11.007.
  10. Jonas De Vos, Dick Ettema, and Frank Witlox. Changing travel behaviour and attitudes following a residential relocation. Journal of Transport Geography, 73:131-147, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.10.013.
  11. Jonas De Vos and Frank Witlox. Transportation policy as spatial planning tool; reducing urban sprawl by increasing travel costs and clustering infrastructure and public transportation. Journal of Transport Geography, 33:117-125, 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.09.014.
  12. Anne Durand, Lucas Harms, Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser, and Toon Zijlstra. Mobility-as-a-Service and changes in travel preferences and travel behaviour: a literature review. KiM Netherlands Institute for Transport Policy Analysis, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32813.33760.
  13. Ramaswamy Hariharan and Kentaro Toyama. Project Lachesis: Parsing and Modeling Location Histories. In Geographic Information Science, pages 106-124. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30231-5_8.
  14. Eva Heinen and Kiron Chatterjee. The same mode again? An exploration of mode choice variability in Great Britain using the National Travel Survey. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78:266-282, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.015.
  15. Eva Heinen and David Ogilvie. Variability in baseline travel behaviour as a predictor of changes in commuting by active travel, car and public transport: a natural experimental study. Journal of transport & health, 3(1):77-85, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2015.11.002.
  16. David A Hensher, Corinne Mulley, Chinh Ho, Yale Wong, Göran Smith, and John D Nelson. Understanding Mobility as a Service (MaaS): Past, Present and Future. Elsevier, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2019-0-00508-0.
  17. Haosheng Huang, Georg Gartner, Jukka M Krisp, Martin Raubal, and Nico Van de Weghe. Location based services: ongoing evolution and research agenda. Journal of Location Based Services, 12(2):63-93, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/17489725.2018.1508763.
  18. Taru Jain, Marilyn Johnson, and Geoffrey Rose. Exploring the process of travel behaviour change and mobility trajectories associated with car share adoption. Travel Behaviour and Society, 18:117-131, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.10.006.
  19. Olle Järv, Rein Ahas, and Frank Witlox. Understanding monthly variability in human activity spaces: A twelve-month study using mobile phone call detail records. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 38:122-135, 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.11.003.
  20. David Jonietz and Dominik Bucher. Continuous Trajectory Pattern Mining for Mobility Behaviour Change Detection. In Progress in Location Based Services 2018, pages 211-230. Springer International Publishing, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71470-7_11.
  21. Leonard Kaufman and Peter J Rousseeuw. Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis, volume 344. John Wiley & Sons, 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316801.
  22. Ryuichi Kitamura, Toshiyuki Yamamoto, and Satoshi Fujii. The effectiveness of panels in detecting changes in discrete travel behavior. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 37(2):191-206, 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(01)00036-2.
  23. Meng Li, Mingqiao Zou, and Huiping Li. Urban Travel Behavior Study Based on Data Fusion Model. In Data-Driven Solutions to Transportation Problems, pages 111-135. Elsevier, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817026-7.00005-9.
  24. Tao Lin, Donggen Wang, and Meng Zhou. Residential relocation and changes in travel behavior: what is the role of social context change? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 111:360-374, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.03.015.
  25. Robert Lund, Xiaolan L Wang, Qi Qi Lu, Jaxk Reeves, Colin Gallagher, and Yang Feng. Changepoint Detection in Periodic and Autocorrelated Time Series. Journal of Climate, 20(20):5178-5190, 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4291.1.
  26. Henry Martin, Henrik Becker, Dominik Bucher, David Jonietz, Martin Raubal, and Kay W Axhausen. Begleitstudie SBB Green Class - Abschlussbericht. Working Paper No. 1439, Institute for Transport Planning and Systems, ETH Zürich, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000353337.
  27. Famke JM Mölenberg, Jenna Panter, Alex Burdorf, and Frank J van Lenthe. A systematic review of the effect of infrastructural interventions to promote cycling: strengthening causal inference from observational data. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16(1):1-31, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0850-1.
  28. Claudia Nobis. Multimodality: Facets and Causes of Sustainable Mobility Behavior. Transportation Research Record, 2010(1):35-44, 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.3141/2010-05.
  29. Rebekka Oostendorp and Laura Gebhardt. Combining means of transport as a users' strategy to optimize traveling in an urban context: empirical results on intermodal travel behavior from a survey in Berlin. Journal of Transport Geography, 71:72-83, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.07.006.
  30. Jan Prillwitz, Sylvia Harms, and Martin Lanzendorf. Interactions between Residential Relocations, Life Course Events, and Daily Commute Distances. Transportation Research Record, 2021(1):64-69, 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.3141/2021-08.
  31. Daniel J Reck, David A Hensher, and Chinh Q Ho. MaaS bundle design. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 141:485-501, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.09.021.
  32. Peter J Rousseeuw. Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20:53-65, 1987. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7.
  33. Stefan Schönfelder and Kay W Axhausen. Urban Rhythms and Travel Behaviour: Spatial and Temporal Phenomena of Daily Travel. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315548715.
  34. Liridona Sopjani, Jenny Janhager Stier, Mia Hesselgren, and Sofia Ritzén. Shared mobility services versus private car: Implications of changes in everyday life. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259:120845, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120845.
  35. Erla Sturludottir, Helga Gunnlaugsdottir, Olafur K Nielsen, and Gunnar Stefansson. Detection of a changepoint, a mean-shift accompanied with a trend change, in short time-series with autocorrelation. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 46(7):5808-5818, 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2014.1002849.
  36. Bo Sun, Fei Yu, Kui Wu, and Victor CM Leung. Mobility-based anomaly detection in cellular mobile networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM workshop on Wireless security, pages 61-69, 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1023646.1023658.
  37. Lijun Sun, Xinyu Chen, Zhaocheng He, and Luis F Miranda-Moreno. Routine Pattern Discovery and Anomaly Detection in Individual Travel Behavior. Networks and Spatial Economics, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-021-09542-9.
  38. Yusak O Susilo and Kay W Axhausen. Repetitions in individual daily activity-travel-location patterns: a study using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index. Transportation, 41(5):995-1011, 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9519-4.
  39. Danique Ton, Lara-Britt Zomer, Florian Schneider, Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser, Dorine Duives, Oded Cats, and Serge Hoogendoorn. Latent classes of daily mobility patterns: the relationship with attitudes towards modes. Transportation, 47(4):1843-1866, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-09975-9.
  40. Chieh-Yuan Tsai and Yu-Chen Shieh. A change detection method for sequential patterns. Decision Support Systems, 46(2):501-511, 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.09.003.
  41. Yulong Wang, Kun Qin, Yixiang Chen, and Pengxiang Zhao. Detecting Anomalous Trajectories and Behavior Patterns Using Hierarchical Clustering from Taxi GPS Data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(1):25, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7010025.
  42. Paul Weiser, Simon Scheider, Dominik Bucher, Peter Kiefer, and Martin Raubal. Towards sustainable mobility behavior: research challenges for location-aware information and communication technology. GeoInformatica, 20(2):213-239, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-015-0242-x.
  43. Yao Yao, Ye Hong, Daiqiang Wu, Yatao Zhang, and Qingfeng Guan. Estimating the effects of “community opening” policy on alleviating traffic congestion in large Chinese cities by integrating ant colony optimization and complex network analyses. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 70:163-174, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.03.005.
  44. Zhan Zhao, Haris N Koutsopoulos, and Jinhua Zhao. Detecting pattern changes in individual travel behavior: A Bayesian approach. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 112:73-88, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.03.017.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail