Document Open Access Logo

Sublinear Time Hypergraph Sparsification via Cut and Edge Sampling Queries

Authors Yu Chen, Sanjeev Khanna, Ansh Nagda



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.53.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.76 MB
  • 21 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Yu Chen
  • Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Sanjeev Khanna
  • Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Ansh Nagda
  • University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Acknowledgements

We thanks the anonymous referees for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Cite AsGet BibTex

Yu Chen, Sanjeev Khanna, and Ansh Nagda. Sublinear Time Hypergraph Sparsification via Cut and Edge Sampling Queries. In 48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 198, pp. 53:1-53:21, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.53

Abstract

The problem of sparsifying a graph or a hypergraph while approximately preserving its cut structure has been extensively studied and has many applications. In a seminal work, Benczúr and Karger (1996) showed that given any n-vertex undirected weighted graph G and a parameter ε ∈ (0,1), there is a near-linear time algorithm that outputs a weighted subgraph G' of G of size Õ(n/ε²) such that the weight of every cut in G is preserved to within a (1 ± ε)-factor in G'. The graph G' is referred to as a (1 ± ε)-approximate cut sparsifier of G. Subsequent recent work has obtained a similar result for the more general problem of hypergraph cut sparsifiers. However, all known sparsification algorithms require Ω(n + m) time where n denotes the number of vertices and m denotes the number of hyperedges in the hypergraph. Since m can be exponentially large in n, a natural question is if it is possible to create a hypergraph cut sparsifier in time polynomial in n, independent of the number of edges. We resolve this question in the affirmative, giving the first sublinear time algorithm for this problem, given appropriate query access to the hypergraph. Specifically, we design an algorithm that constructs a (1 ± ε)-approximate cut sparsifier of a hypergraph H(V,E) in polynomial time in n, independent of the number of hyperedges, when given access to the hypergraph using the following two queries: 1) given any cut (S, ̄S), return the size |δ_E(S)| (cut value queries); and 2) given any cut (S, ̄S), return a uniformly at random edge crossing the cut (cut edge sample queries). Our algorithm outputs a sparsifier with Õ(n/ε²) edges, which is essentially optimal. We then extend our results to show that cut value and cut edge sample queries can also be used to construct hypergraph spectral sparsifiers in poly(n) time, independent of the number of hyperedges. We complement the algorithmic results above by showing that any algorithm that has access to only one of the above two types of queries can not give a hypergraph cut sparsifier in time that is polynomial in n. Finally, we show that our algorithmic results also hold if we replace the cut edge sample queries with a pair neighbor sample query that for any pair of vertices, returns a random edge incident on them. In contrast, we show that having access only to cut value queries and queries that return a random edge incident on a given single vertex, is not sufficient.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Sketching and sampling
  • Theory of computation → Streaming, sublinear and near linear time algorithms
  • Theory of computation → Sparsification and spanners
Keywords
  • hypergraphs
  • graph sparsification
  • cut queries

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Kook Jin Ahn and Sudipto Guha. Graph sparsification in the semi-streaming model. In Susanne Albers, Alberto Marchetti-Spaccamela, Yossi Matias, Sotiris E. Nikoletseas, and Wolfgang Thomas, editors, Automata, Languages and Programming, 36th Internatilonal Colloquium, ICALP 2009, Rhodes, Greece, July 5-12, 2009, Proceedings, Part II, volume 5556 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 328-338. Springer, 2009. Google Scholar
  2. Kook Jin Ahn, Sudipto Guha, and Andrew McGregor. Graph sketches: sparsification, spanners, and subgraphs. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, PODS 2012, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, May 20-24, 2012, pages 5-14, 2012. Google Scholar
  3. Kook Jin Ahn, Sudipto Guha, and Andrew McGregor. Spectral sparsification in dynamic graph streams. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques - 16th International Workshop, APPROX 2013, and 17th International Workshop, RANDOM 2013, Berkeley, CA, USA, August 21-23, 2013. Proceedings, pages 1-10, 2013. Google Scholar
  4. Nikhil Bansal, Ola Svensson, and Luca Trevisan. New notions and constructions of sparsification for graphs and hypergraphs. In 60th IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2019, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, November 9-12, 2019, pages 910-928, 2019. Google Scholar
  5. Joshua D. Batson, Daniel A. Spielman, and Nikhil Srivastava. Twice-ramanujan sparsifiers. SIAM J. Comput., 41(6):1704-1721, 2012. Google Scholar
  6. András A. Benczúr and David R. Karger. Approximating s-t minimum cuts in Õ(n^2) time. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, May 22-24, 1996, pages 47-55, 1996. Google Scholar
  7. András A. Benczúr and David R. Karger. Randomized approximation schemes for cuts and flows in capacitated graphs. SIAM J. Comput., 44(2):290-319, 2015. Google Scholar
  8. Ümit V. Çatalyürek and Cevdet Aykanat. Hypergraph-partitioning-based decomposition for parallel sparse-matrix vector multiplication. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., 10(7):673-693, 1999. Google Scholar
  9. Ümit V. Çatalyürek, Erik G. Boman, Karen D. Devine, Doruk Bozdag, Robert T. Heaphy, and Lee Ann Riesen. A repartitioning hypergraph model for dynamic load balancing. J. Parallel Distributed Comput., 69(8):711-724, 2009. Google Scholar
  10. Chandra Chekuri and Chao Xu. Minimum cuts and sparsification in hypergraphs. SIAM J. Comput., 47(6):2118-2156, 2018. Google Scholar
  11. Yu Chen, Sanjeev Khanna, and Ansh Nagda. Near-linear size hypergraph cut sparsifiers. In 61st IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS. IEEE Computer Society, 2020. Google Scholar
  12. Wai Shing Fung, Ramesh Hariharan, Nicholas J. A. Harvey, and Debmalya Panigrahi. A general framework for graph sparsification. SIAM J. Comput., 48(4):1196-1223, 2019. Google Scholar
  13. Ashish Goel, Michael Kapralov, and Ian Post. Single pass sparsification in the streaming model with edge deletions. CoRR, abs/1203.4900, 2012. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4900.
  14. Yuchi Huang, Qingshan Liu, and Dimitris N. Metaxas. Video object segmentation by hypergraph cut. In 2009 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2009), 20-25 June 2009, Miami, Florida, USA, pages 1738-1745, 2009. Google Scholar
  15. Michael Kapralov, Yin Tat Lee, Cameron Musco, Christopher Musco, and Aaron Sidford. Single pass spectral sparsification in dynamic streams. SIAM J. Comput., 46(1):456-477, 2017. Google Scholar
  16. Michael Kapralov, Aida Mousavifar, Cameron Musco, Christopher Musco, Navid Nouri, Aaron Sidford, and Jakab Tardos. Fast and space efficient spectral sparsification in dynamic streams. In Shuchi Chawla, editor, Proceedings of the 2020 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2020, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, January 5-8, 2020, pages 1814-1833. SIAM, 2020. Google Scholar
  17. David R. Karger. Global min-cuts in RNC, and other ramifications of a simple min-cut algorithm. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual ACM/SIGACT-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 25-27 January 1993, Austin, Texas, USA., pages 21-30, 1993. Google Scholar
  18. David R. Karger. Random sampling in cut, flow, and network design problems. Math. Oper. Res., 24(2):383-413, 1999. Google Scholar
  19. Dmitry Kogan and Robert Krauthgamer. Sketching cuts in graphs and hypergraphs. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, ITCS 2015, Rehovot, Israel, January 11-13, 2015, pages 367-376, 2015. Google Scholar
  20. Yin Tat Lee, Aaron Sidford, and Sam Chiu-wai Wong. A faster cutting plane method and its implications for combinatorial and convex optimization. In IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2015, Berkeley, CA, USA, 17-20 October, 2015, pages 1049-1065, 2015. Google Scholar
  21. Yin Tat Lee and He Sun. An sdp-based algorithm for linear-sized spectral sparsification. In Hamed Hatami, Pierre McKenzie, and Valerie King, editors, Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2017, Montreal, QC, Canada, June 19-23, 2017, pages 678-687. ACM, 2017. Google Scholar
  22. Anand Louis. Hypergraph markov operators, eigenvalues and approximation algorithms. In Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Annual ACM on Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2015, Portland, OR, USA, June 14-17, 2015, pages 713-722, 2015. Google Scholar
  23. Tasuku Soma and Yuichi Yoshida. Spectral sparsification of hypergraphs. In Timothy M. Chan, editor, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2019, San Diego, California, USA, January 6-9, 2019, pages 2570-2581. SIAM, 2019. Google Scholar
  24. Daniel A. Spielman and Nikhil Srivastava. Graph sparsification by effective resistances. SIAM J. Comput., 40(6):1913-1926, 2011. Google Scholar
  25. Daniel A. Spielman and Shang-Hua Teng. Nearly-linear time algorithms for graph partitioning, graph sparsification, and solving linear systems. In László Babai, editor, Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Chicago, IL, USA, June 13-16, 2004, pages 81-90. ACM, 2004. Google Scholar
  26. Yutaro Yamaguchi, Anna Ogawa, Akiko Takeda, and Satoru Iwata. Cyber security analysis of power networks by hypergraph cut algorithms. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 6(5):2189-2199, 2015. Google Scholar
  27. Yuichi Yoshida. Cheeger inequalities for submodular transformations. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2019, San Diego, California, USA, January 6-9, 2019, pages 2582-2601, 2019. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail