Testing k-Monotonicity

Abstract

A Boolean k-monotone function defined over a finite poset domain D alternates between the values 0 and 1 at most k times on any ascending chain in D. Therefore, k-monotone functions are natural generalizations of the classical monotone functions, which are the 1-monotone functions.

Motivated by the recent interest in k-monotone functions in the context of circuit complexity and learning theory, and by the central role that  monotonicity testing plays in the context of property testing, we initiate a systematic study of k-monotone functions, in the property testing model. In this model, the goal is to distinguish functions that are k-monotone (or are close to being k-monotone) from functions that are far from being k-monotone. 

Our results include the following:

1. We demonstrate a separation between testing k-monotonicity and testing monotonicity, on the hypercube domain {0,1}^d, for k >= 3;
2. We demonstrate a separation between testing and learning  on {0,1}^d, for k=\omega(\log d): testing k-monotonicity  can be       performed with 2^{O(\sqrt d . \log d . \log{1/\eps})} queries,  while learning k-monotone functions requires 2^{\Omega(k . \sqrt d .{1/\eps})} queries (Blais et al. (RANDOM 2015)).
3. We present a tolerant test for functions f\colon[n]^d\to \{0,1\}$with complexity independent of n, which makes progress on a problem left open by Berman et al. (STOC 2014). 

Our techniques exploit the testing-by-learning paradigm, use novel applications of  Fourier analysis on the grid [n]^d, and draw            connections to distribution testing techniques.

 Our techniques exploit the testing-by-learning paradigm, use novel applications of  Fourier analysis on the grid [n]^d, and draw connections to distribution testing techniques.