Document Open Access Logo

Matrix Multiplication via Matrix Groups

Authors Jonah Blasiak , Henry Cohn , Joshua A. Grochow , Kevin Pratt , Chris Umans

Thumbnail PDF


  • Filesize: 0.69 MB
  • 16 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Jonah Blasiak
  • Department of Mathematics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Henry Cohn
  • Microsoft Research New England, One Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA, USA
Joshua A. Grochow
  • Departments of Computer Science and Mathematics, University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA
Kevin Pratt
  • School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Chris Umans
  • Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

Cite AsGet BibTex

Jonah Blasiak, Henry Cohn, Joshua A. Grochow, Kevin Pratt, and Chris Umans. Matrix Multiplication via Matrix Groups. In 14th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 251, pp. 19:1-19:16, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)


In 2003, Cohn and Umans proposed a group-theoretic approach to bounding the exponent of matrix multiplication. Previous work within this approach ruled out certain families of groups as a route to obtaining ω = 2, while other families of groups remain potentially viable. In this paper we turn our attention to matrix groups, whose usefulness within this framework was relatively unexplored. We first show that groups of Lie type cannot prove ω = 2 within the group-theoretic approach. This is based on a representation-theoretic argument that identifies the second-smallest dimension of an irreducible representation of a group as a key parameter that determines its viability in this framework. Our proof builds on Gowers' result concerning product-free sets in quasirandom groups. We then give another barrier that rules out certain natural matrix group constructions that make use of subgroups that are far from being self-normalizing. Our barrier results leave open several natural paths to obtain ω = 2 via matrix groups. To explore these routes we propose working in the continuous setting of Lie groups, in which we develop an analogous theory. Obtaining the analogue of ω = 2 in this potentially easier setting is a key challenge that represents an intermediate goal short of actually proving ω = 2. We give two constructions in the continuous setting, each of which evades one of our two barriers.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Algebraic complexity theory
  • Fast matrix multiplication
  • representation theory
  • matrix groups


  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    PDF Downloads


  1. Josh Alman. Limits on the universal method for matrix multiplication. Theory Comput., 17:1, 1-30, 2021. URL:
  2. Josh Alman and Virginia Vassilevska Williams. Limits on all known (and some unknown) approaches to matrix multiplication. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2018), pages 580-591. IEEE Computer Society, 2018. URL:
  3. Josh Alman and Virginia Vassilevska Williams. A refined laser method and faster matrix multiplication. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, (SODA 2021), pages 522-539. SIAM, 2021. URL:
  4. Andris Ambainis, Yuval Filmus, and François Le Gall. Fast matrix multiplication: limitations of the Coppersmith-Winograd method. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2015), pages 585-593. ACM, 2015. URL:
  5. Michèle Audin. Torus actions on symplectic manifolds, volume 93 of Progress in Mathematics. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, revised edition, 2004. URL:
  6. Jonah Blasiak, Thomas Church, Henry Cohn, Joshua A. Grochow, Eric Naslund, William F. Sawin, and Chris Umans. On cap sets and the group-theoretic approach to matrix multiplication. Discrete Anal., pages 1-27 (Paper No. 3), 2017. URL:
  7. Jonah Blasiak, Thomas Church, Henry Cohn, Joshua A. Grochow, and Chris Umans. Which groups are amenable to proving exponent two for matrix multiplication? Preprint, 2017, arXiv: Google Scholar
  8. Emmanuel Breuillard. A brief introduction to approximate groups. In Thin groups and superstrong approximation, volume 61 of Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., pages 23-50. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2014. Google Scholar
  9. Matthias Christandl, Péter Vrana, and Jeroen Zuiddam. Barriers for fast matrix multiplication from irreversibility. Theory Comput., 17:2, 1-32, 2021. URL:
  10. Henry Cohn, Robert Kleinberg, Balázs Szegedy, and Christopher Umans. Group-theoretic algorithms for matrix multiplication. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2005), pages 379-388. IEEE Computer Society, 2005. URL:
  11. Henry Cohn and Christopher Umans. A group-theoretic approach to fast matrix multiplication. In Proceedings of the 44th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2003), pages 438-449. IEEE Computer Society, 2003. URL:
  12. Jason Fulman and Robert Guralnick. Bounds on the number and sizes of conjugacy classes in finite Chevalley groups with applications to derangements. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 364(6):3023-3070, 2012. URL:
  13. W. T. Gowers. Quasirandom groups. Combin. Probab. Comput., 17(3):363-387, 2008. URL:
  14. Joe Harris. Algebraic geometry: a first course, volume 133 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992. URL:
  15. Vicente Landazuri and Gary M. Seitz. On the minimal degrees of projective representations of the finite Chevalley groups. J. Algebra, 32:418-443, 1974. URL:
  16. Michael Larsen, Gunter Malle, and Pham Huu Tiep. The largest irreducible representations of simple groups. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3), 106(1):65-96, 2013. URL:
  17. Gunter Malle and Donna Testerman. Linear algebraic groups and finite groups of Lie type, volume 133 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011. URL:
  18. Will Sawin. Bounds for matchings in nonabelian groups. Electron. J. Combin., 25(4):#P4.23, 1-21, 2018. URL:
Questions / Remarks / Feedback

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail