LIPIcs.SNAPL.2015.140.pdf
- Filesize: 1.15 MB
- 16 pages
Document
Tracking the Flow of Ideas through the Programming Languages Literature
Authors
-
Part of:
Volume:
1st Summit on Advances in Programming Languages (SNAPL 2015)
Series: Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)
Conference: Summit on Advances in Programming Languages (SNAPL) - License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license
- Publication date: 2015-04-30
Cite AsGet BibTex
Michael Greenberg, Kathleen Fisher, and David Walker. Tracking the Flow of Ideas through the Programming Languages Literature. In 1st Summit on Advances in Programming Languages (SNAPL 2015). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 32, pp. 140-155, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2015)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SNAPL.2015.140
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SNAPL.2015.140
Abstract
How have conferences like ICFP, OOPSLA, PLDI, and POPL evolved over the last 20 years? Did generalizing the Call for Papers for OOPSLA in 2007 or changing the name of the umbrella conference to SPLASH in 2010 have any effect on the kinds of papers published there? How do POPL and PLDI papers compare, topic-wise? Is there related work that I am missing? Have the ideas in O'Hearn's classic paper on separation logic shifted the kinds of papers that appear in POPL? Does a proposed program committee cover the range of submissions expected for the conference? If we had better tools for analyzing the programming language literature, we might be able to answer these questions and others like them in a data-driven way. In this paper, we explore how topic modeling, a branch of machine learning, might help the programming language community better understand our literature.
Keywords
- programming languages literature
- topic models
- irony
Metrics
- Access Statistics
-
Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
0PDF Downloads