Document Open Access Logo

Finding a Maximum Clique in a Disk Graph

Authors Jared Espenant, J. Mark Keil, Debajyoti Mondal

PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.SoCG.2023.30.pdf
  • Filesize: 1.34 MB
  • 17 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Jared Espenant
  • Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
J. Mark Keil
  • Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Debajyoti Mondal
  • Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Funding

The work is supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

Cite AsGet BibTex

Jared Espenant, J. Mark Keil, and Debajyoti Mondal. Finding a Maximum Clique in a Disk Graph. In 39th International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 258, pp. 30:1-30:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2023.30

Abstract

A disk graph is an intersection graph of disks in the Euclidean plane, where the disks correspond to the vertices of the graph and a pair of vertices are adjacent if and only if their corresponding disks intersect. The problem of determining the time complexity of computing a maximum clique in a disk graph is a long-standing open question that has been very well studied in the literature. The problem is known to be open even when the radii of all the disks are in the interval [1,(1+ε)], where ε > 0. If all the disks are unit disks then there exists an O(n³log n)-time algorithm to compute a maximum clique, which is the best-known running time for over a decade. Although the problem of computing a maximum clique in a disk graph remains open, it is known to be APX-hard for the intersection graphs of many other convex objects such as intersection graphs of ellipses, triangles, and a combination of unit disks and axis-parallel rectangles. Here we obtain the following results. - We give an algorithm to compute a maximum clique in a unit disk graph in O(n^2.5 log n)-time, which improves the previously best known running time of O(n³log n) [Eppstein '09]. - We extend a widely used "co-2-subdivision approach" to prove that computing a maximum clique in a combination of unit disks and axis-parallel rectangles is NP-hard to approximate within 4448/4449 ≈ 0.9997. The use of a "co-2-subdivision approach" was previously thought to be unlikely in this setting [Bonnet et al. '20]. Our result improves the previously known inapproximability factor of 7633010347/7633010348 ≈ 0.9999. - We show that the parameter minimum lens width of the disk arrangement may be used to make progress in the case when disk radii are in [1,(1+ε)]. For example, if the minimum lens width is at least 0.265 and ε ≤ 0.0001, which still allows for non-Helly triples in the arrangement, then one can find a maximum clique in polynomial time.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Computational geometry
Keywords
  • Maximum clique
  • Disk graph
  • Time complexity
  • APX-hardness

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
    0
    Metadata Views

Related Versions

References

  1. Pankaj K. Agarwal and Micha Sharir. Arrangements and their applications. In Jörg-Rüdiger Sack and Jorge Urrutia, editors, Handbook of Computational Geometry, pages 49-119. Elsevier, 2000. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-82537-7.x5000-1.
  2. Alok Aggarwal, Hiroshi Imai, Naoki Katoh, and Subhash Suri. Finding k points with minimum diameter and related problems. J. Algorithms, 12(1):38-56, 1991. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-6774(91)90022-Q.
  3. Christoph Ambühl and Uli Wagner. The clique problem in intersection graphs of ellipses and triangles. Theory of Computing Systems, 38(3):279-292, 2005. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-005-1141-6.
  4. J. Bang-Jensen, B. Reed, M. Schacht, R. Šámal, B. Toft, and U. Wagner. Topics in Discrete Mathematics, Dedicated to Jarik Nešetřil on the Occasion of his 60th birthday, volume 26 of Algorithms and Combinatorics, pages 613-627. Springer, 2006. Google Scholar
  5. Marthe Bonamy, Édouard Bonnet, Nicolas Bousquet, Pierre Charbit, Panos Giannopoulos, Eun Jung Kim, Pawel Rzazewski, Florian Sikora, and Stéphan Thomassé. EPTAS and subexponential algorithm for maximum clique on disk and unit ball graphs. J. ACM, 68(2):9:1-9:38, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3433160.
  6. Édouard Bonnet, Panos Giannopoulos, Eun Jung Kim, Pawel Rzazewski, and Florian Sikora. QPTAS and subexponential algorithm for maximum clique on disk graphs. In Bettina Speckmann and Csaba D. Tóth, editors, Proceedings of the 34th International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG), volume 99 of LIPIcs, pages 12:1-12:15. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2018.12.
  7. Édouard Bonnet, Nicolas Grelier, and Tillmann Miltzow. Maximum Clique in Disk-Like Intersection Graphs. In Nitin Saxena and Sunil Simon, editors, Proceedings of the 40th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2020), volume 182 of LIPIcs, pages 17:1-17:18. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2020.17.
  8. Heinz Breu. Algorithmic aspects of constrained unit disk graphs. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, 1996. Google Scholar
  9. Sergio Cabello. Maximum clique for disks of two sizes. Open problems from Geometric Intersection Graphs: Problems and Directions, CG Week Workshop, 2015. Google Scholar
  10. Sergio Cabello, Jean Cardinal, and Stefan Langerman. The clique problem in ray intersection graphs. Discret. Comput. Geom., 50(3):771-783, 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-013-9538-5.
  11. Miroslav Chlebík and Janka Chlebíková. Complexity of approximating bounded variants of optimization problems. Theor. Comput. Sci., 354(3):320-338, 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2005.11.029.
  12. Miroslav Chlebík and Janka Chlebíková. The complexity of combinatorial optimization problems on d-dimensional boxes. SIAM J. Discret. Math., 21(1):158-169, 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/050629276.
  13. Brent N. Clark, Charles J. Colbourn, and David S. Johnson. Unit disk graphs. Discret. Math., 86(1-3):165-177, 1990. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(90)90358-O.
  14. David Eppstein. Graph-theoretic solutions to computational geometry problems. In Christophe Paul and Michel Habib, editors, Proceedings of the 35th International Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (WG), pages 1-16, 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11409-0_1.
  15. Jared Espenant, J. Mark Keil, and Debajyoti Mondal. Finding a maximum clique in a disk graph, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2303.07645.
  16. Stefan Felsner, Rudolf Müller, and Lorenz Wernisch. Trapezoid graphs and generalizations, geometry and algorithms. Discret. Appl. Math., 74(1):13-32, 1997. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-218X(96)00013-3.
  17. Aleksei V. Fishkin. Disk graphs: A short survey. In Klaus Jansen and Roberto Solis-Oba, editors, Approximation and Online Algorithms, First International Workshop, WAOA 2003, Budapest, Hungary, September 16-18, 2003, Revised Papers, volume 2909 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 260-264. Springer, 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24592-6_23.
  18. Herbert Fleischner, Gert Sabidussi, and Vladimir I. Sarvanov. Maximum independent sets in 3- and 4-regular hamiltonian graphs. Discret. Math., 310(20):2742-2749, 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2010.05.028.
  19. E. Helly. über mengen konvexer körper mit gemeinschaftlichen punkten. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung, 32:175-176, 1923. Google Scholar
  20. John Hershberger and Subhash Suri. Finding tailored partitions. J. Algorithms, 12(3):431-463, 1991. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-6774(91)90013-O.
  21. John E. Hopcroft and Richard M. Karp. An n^5/2 algorithm for maximum matchings in bipartite graphs. SIAM J. Comput., 2(4):225-231, 1973. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/0202019.
  22. Mark L. Huson and Arunabha Sen. Broadcast scheduling algorithms for radio networks. In Proceedings of MILCOM'95, volume 2, pages 647-651. IEEE, 1995. Google Scholar
  23. Hiroshi Imai and Takao Asano. Finding the connected components and a maximum clique of an intersection graph of rectangles in the plane. J. Algorithms, 4(4):310-323, 1983. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-6774(83)90012-3.
  24. Hiroshi Imai and Takao Asano. Efficient algorithms for geometric graph search problems. SIAM J. Comput., 15(2):478-494, 1986. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/0215033.
  25. J. Mark Keil, Debajyoti Mondal, Ehsan Moradi, and Yakov Nekrich. Finding a maximum clique in a grounded 1-bend string graph. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, 26(4), 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.7155/jgaa.00608.
  26. Jan Kratochvíl and Jaroslav Nešetřil. Independent set and clique problems in intersection-defined classes of graphs. Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae, 31(1):85-93, 1990. Google Scholar
  27. Matthias Middendorf and Frank Pfeiffer. The max clique problem in classes of string-graphs. Discret. Math., 108(1-3):365-372, 1992. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(92)90688-C.
  28. Michael Ian Shamos and Dan Hoey. Closest-point problems. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 151-162, 1975. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1975.8.
  29. Alexander Tiskin. Fast distance multiplication of unit-monge matrices. Algorithmica, 71(4):859-888, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-013-9830-z.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact