More Randomness From Noisy Sources

Bancal, Jean-Daniel; Scarani, Valerio

doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2014.1

Document

More Randomness From Noisy Sources

Authors Jean-Daniel Bancal, Valerio Scarani

Part of: Volume: 9th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2014)
Part of: Series: Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)
Part of: Conference: Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC)
License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license
Publication Date: 2014-12-11

PDF

File

PDF

LIPIcs.TQC.2014.1.pdf

Filesize: 378 kB
6 pages

Document Identifiers

DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2014.1
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-48015

Subject Classification

Keywords

Randomness
Bell inequalities
Trusted provider assumption

Metrics

Access Statistics
Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)

0

PDF Downloads

0

Metadata Views

Abstract

Bell experiments can be used to generate private random numbers. An ideal Bell experiment would involve measuring a state of two maximally entangled qubits, but in practice any state produced is subject to noise. Here we consider how the techniques presented in Refs [Bancal et al., New J. Phys., 2014] and [Nieto-Silleras, New J. Phys., 2014], i.e. using an optimized Bell inequality, and taking advantage of the fact that the device provider is not our adversary, can be used to improve the rate of randomness generation in Bell-like tests performed on singlet states subject to either white or dephasing noise.

Cite As Get BibTex

Jean-Daniel Bancal and Valerio Scarani. More Randomness From Noisy Sources. In 9th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2014). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 27, pp. 1-6, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2014) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2014.1

Author Details

Jean-Daniel Bancal

Valerio Scarani

Questions / Remarks / Feedback

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail