Designing Declarative Language Tutorials: A Guided and Individualized Approach

Authors Anael Kuperwajs Cohen, Wode Ni, Joshua Sunshine



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

OASIcs.PLATEAU.2019.4.pdf
  • Filesize: 1.56 MB
  • 6 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Anael Kuperwajs Cohen
  • Macalester College, St Paul, MN, USA
Wode Ni
  • Institute for Software Research, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Joshua Sunshine
  • Institute for Software Research, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Cite AsGet BibTex

Anael Kuperwajs Cohen, Wode Ni, and Joshua Sunshine. Designing Declarative Language Tutorials: A Guided and Individualized Approach. In 10th Workshop on Evaluation and Usability of Programming Languages and Tools (PLATEAU 2019). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 76, pp. 4:1-4:6, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)
https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.PLATEAU.2019.4

Abstract

The ability to declare what a program should include rather than how these features should be implemented makes declarative languages very useful in many visual output programs. The wide-ranging uses of these programs, in domains ranging from architecture to web programming to data visualization, encourages us to find an effective method to teach them. Traditional tutorial systems are usually non-interactive and have a gap between the learning and application. This can leave the user frustrated without a way to move forward in the learning process. A general lack of guidance can lead the student down an incorrect path. To prevent these difficulties, we propose a guided tour followed by novel question types that both direct the student’s learning and creates a focused environment to practice individual skills. Lastly, we propose a study to test the hypothesis that this tutorial is quicker to complete and results in a greater understanding of the declarative language.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Applied computing → Interactive learning environments
Keywords
  • Declarative Programming
  • Programming Language Tutorial
  • Visualizations

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. UW Interactive Data Lab bar Papers. URL: http://idl.cs.washington.edu/papers/d3/.
  2. Erik Andersen, Eleanor O'Rourke, Yun-En Liu, Rich Snider, Jeff Lowdermilk, David Truong, Seth Cooper, and Zoran Popovic. The impact of tutorials on games of varying complexity. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '12, page 59, Austin, Texas, USA, 2012. ACM Press. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207687.
  3. Julie L. Booth and Kenneth R. Koedinger. Are diagrams always helpful tools? developmental and individual differences in the effect of presentation format on student problem solving. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(Pt 3):492-511, September 2012. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02041.x.
  4. Robert Bruce Findler, John Clements, Cormac Flanagan, Matthew Flatt, Shriram Krishnamurthi, Paul Steckler, and Matthias Felleisen. DrScheme: a programming environment for Scheme. J. Funct. Program., 12:159-182, 2002. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956796801004208.
  5. Sumit Gulwani. Example-based Learning in Computer-aided STEM Education. Commun. ACM, 57(8):70-80, August 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2634273.
  6. J Heer and M Bostock. Declarative Language Design for Interactive Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6):1149-1156, November 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.144.
  7. Caitlin Kelleher and Randy Pausch. Stencils-based tutorials: design and evaluation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '05, page 541, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2005. ACM Press. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055047.
  8. Kenneth R. Koedinger. Emergent properties and structural constraints: Advantages of diagrammatic representations for reasoning and learning. In Proc. AAAI Spring Symposium on Reasoning with Diagrammatic Representations, pages 154-169, 1992. URL: http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Spring/1992/SS-92-02/SS92-02-031.pdf.
  9. Jill H. Larkin and Herbert A. Simon. Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science, 11(1):65-100, January 1987. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(87)80026-5.
  10. Thomas L Naps, Rudolf Fleischer, Myles McNally, and Alma College. Exploring the Role of Visualization and Engagement in Computer Science Education. Google Scholar
  11. Arvind Satyanarayan, Kanit Wongsuphasawat, and Jeffrey Heer. Declarative Interaction Design for Data Visualization. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST '14, pages 669-678, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. event-place: Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647360.
  12. Eliane S. Wiese and Kenneth R. Koedinger. Designing Grounded Feedback: Criteria for Using Linked Representations to Support Learning of Abstract Symbols. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 27(3):448-474, September 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0133-9.
  13. A. Yan, M. J. Lee, and A. J. Ko. Predicting abandonment in online coding tutorials. In 2017 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC), pages 191-199, October 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2017.8103467.