The famous AGM paradigm for the analysis of theory change drew its inspiration from two sources: belief change and norm change. But very early on, interest in the former eclipsed the interest in the latter. Now, many years later, it is appropriate once again to raise the question about norm change. In the author’s terminology, given the current work in Dynamic Doxastic Logic, what might Dynamic Deontic Logic look like?
@InProceedings{segerberg:DagSemProc.07351.3, author = {Segerberg, Krister}, title = {{A blueprint for deontic logic in three (not necessarily easy) steps}}, booktitle = {Formal Models of Belief Change in Rational Agents}, pages = {1--14}, series = {Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)}, ISSN = {1862-4405}, year = {2007}, volume = {7351}, editor = {Giacomo Bonanno and James Delgrande and J\'{e}r\^{o}me Lang and Hans Rott}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik}, address = {Dagstuhl, Germany}, URL = {https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.07351.3}, URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-12187}, doi = {10.4230/DagSemProc.07351.3}, annote = {Keywords: Belief change, norm change, Dynamic Doxastic Logic, Dynamic Deontic Logic} }
Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing