Document Open Access Logo

Coming up With Good Excuses: What to do When no Plan Can be Found

Authors Moritz Göbeldecker, Thomas Keller, Patrick Eyerich, Michael Brenner, Bernhard Nebel

PDF

File

Thumbnail PDF
PDF
DagSemProc.10081.7.pdf
  • Filesize: 201 kB
  • 8 pages

Document Identifiers

Subject Classification

Keywords
  • Planning
  • knowledge representation

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
    0
    Metadata Views

Abstract

can go wrong. First and foremost, an agent might fail to execute
one of the planned actions for some reasons. Even more
annoying, however, is a situation where the agent is incompetent,
i.e., unable to come up with a plan. This might be
due to the fact that there are principal reasons that prohibit a
successful plan or simply because the task’s description is incomplete
or incorrect. In either case, an explanation for such
a failure would be very helpful. We will address this problem
and provide a formalization of coming up with excuses for
not being able to find a plan. Based on that, we will present
an algorithm that is able to find excuses and demonstrate that
such excuses can be found in practical settings in reasonable
time.

Cite As Get BibTex

Moritz Göbeldecker, Thomas Keller, Patrick Eyerich, Michael Brenner, and Bernhard Nebel. Coming up With Good Excuses: What to do When no Plan Can be Found. In Cognitive Robotics. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 10081, pp. 1-8, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2010) https://doi.org/10.4230/DagSemProc.10081.7

Author Details

Moritz Göbeldecker
Thomas Keller
Patrick Eyerich
Michael Brenner
Bernhard Nebel
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2025 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact