DagSemProc.10081.7.pdf
- Filesize: 201 kB
- 8 pages
Document
Coming up With Good Excuses: What to do When no Plan Can be Found
Authors
-
Part of:
Volume:
Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 10081
Series: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc) - License:
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license
- Publication date: 2010-10-27
Cite AsGet BibTex
Moritz Göbeldecker, Thomas Keller, Patrick Eyerich, Michael Brenner, and Bernhard Nebel. Coming up With Good Excuses: What to do When no Plan Can be Found. In Cognitive Robotics. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 10081, pp. 1-8, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2010)
https://doi.org/10.4230/DagSemProc.10081.7
https://doi.org/10.4230/DagSemProc.10081.7
Abstract
can go wrong. First and foremost, an agent might fail to execute
one of the planned actions for some reasons. Even more
annoying, however, is a situation where the agent is incompetent,
i.e., unable to come up with a plan. This might be
due to the fact that there are principal reasons that prohibit a
successful plan or simply because the task’s description is incomplete
or incorrect. In either case, an explanation for such
a failure would be very helpful. We will address this problem
and provide a formalization of coming up with excuses for
not being able to find a plan. Based on that, we will present
an algorithm that is able to find excuses and demonstrate that
such excuses can be found in practical settings in reasonable
time.
Keywords
- Planning
- knowledge representation
Metrics
- Access Statistics
-
Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
0PDF Downloads