Document Open Access Logo

The Logic of Contextuality

Authors Samson Abramsky , Rui Soares Barbosa



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.CSL.2021.5.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.59 MB
  • 18 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Samson Abramsky
  • Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, UK
Rui Soares Barbosa
  • INL - International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory, Braga, Portugal

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Chris Heunen for helpful discussions.

Cite AsGet BibTex

Samson Abramsky and Rui Soares Barbosa. The Logic of Contextuality. In 29th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 183, pp. 5:1-5:18, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2021.5

Abstract

Contextuality is a key signature of quantum non-classicality, which has been shown to play a central role in enabling quantum advantage for a wide range of information-processing and computational tasks. We study the logic of contextuality from a structural point of view, in the setting of partial Boolean algebras introduced by Kochen and Specker in their seminal work. These contrast with traditional quantum logic à la Birkhoff and von Neumann in that operations such as conjunction and disjunction are partial, only being defined in the domain where they are physically meaningful. We study how this setting relates to current work on contextuality such as the sheaf-theoretic and graph-theoretic approaches. We introduce a general free construction extending the commeasurability relation on a partial Boolean algebra, i.e. the domain of definition of the binary logical operations. This construction has a surprisingly broad range of uses. We apply it in the study of a number of issues, including: - establishing the connection between the abstract measurement scenarios studied in the contextuality literature and the setting of partial Boolean algebras; - formulating various contextuality properties in this setting, including probabilistic contextuality as well as the strong, state-independent notion of contextuality given by Kochen-Specker paradoxes, which are logically contradictory statements validated by partial Boolean algebras, specifically those arising from quantum mechanics; - investigating a Logical Exclusivity Principle, and its relation to the Probabilistic Exclusivity Principle widely studied in recent work on contextuality as a step towards closing in on the set of quantum-realisable correlations; - developing some work towards a logical presentation of the Hilbert space tensor product, using logical exclusivity to capture some of its salient quantum features.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Logic
  • Theory of computation → Quantum computation theory
  • Mathematics of computing
Keywords
  • partial Boolean algebras
  • contextuality
  • exclusivity principles
  • Kochen-Specker paradoxes
  • tensor product

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Samson Abramsky. Relational hidden variables and non-locality. Studia Logica, 101(2):411-452, 2013. In Juha Kontinen, Jouko Väänänen, and Dag Westerståhl, editors, special issue on Dependence and Independence in Logic. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-013-9477-4.
  2. Samson Abramsky. Contextuality: At the borders of paradox. In Elaine Landry, editor, Categories for the Working Philosopher. Oxford University Press, 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198748991.003.0011.
  3. Samson Abramsky, Rui Soares Barbosa, Kohei Kishida, Raymond Lal, and Shane Mansfield. Contextuality, cohomology and paradox. In Stephan Kreutzer, editor, Proceedings of 24th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2015), volume 41 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 211-228. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2015.211.
  4. Samson Abramsky, Rui Soares Barbosa, Kohei Kishida, Raymond Lal, and Shane Mansfield. Possibilities determine the combinatorial structure of probability polytopes. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 74:58-65, 2016. In Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov, Janne V. Kujala, and Reinhard Suck, editors, special issue on Foundations of Probability Theory in Psychology and Beyond. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2016.03.006.
  5. Samson Abramsky and Adam Brandenburger. The sheaf-theoretic structure of non-locality and contextuality. New Journal of Physics, 13(11):113036, 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/13/11/113036.
  6. Barbara Amaral, Marcelo Terra Cunha, and Adán Cabello. Exclusivity principle forbids sets of correlations larger than the quantum set. Physical Review A, 89(3):030101, 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.030101.
  7. Garrett Birkhoff and John von Neumann. The logic of quantum mechanics. Annals of Mathematics, 37(4):823-843, 1936. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/1968621.
  8. Adán Cabello. Specker’s fundamental principle of quantum mechanics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1212.1756 [quant-ph], 2012. Google Scholar
  9. Adán Cabello, Simone Severini, and Andreas Winter. Graph-theoretic approach to quantum correlations. Physical Review Letters, 112(4):040401, 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.040401.
  10. Janusz Czelakowski. Partial boolean algebras in a broader sense. Studia Logica, 38(1):1-16, 1979. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00493669.
  11. Tobias Fritz, Ana Belén Sainz, Remigiusz Augusiak, Jonatan Bohr Brask, Rafael Chaves, Anthony Leverrier, and Antonio Acín. Local orthogonality as a multipartite principle for quantum correlations. Nature Communications, 4:2263, 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3263.
  12. Steven Givant and Paul Halmos. Introduction to Boolean algebras. Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag New York, 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68436-9.
  13. Richard J. Greechie. Orthomodular lattices admitting no states. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 10(2):119-132, 1971. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0097-3165(71)90015-X.
  14. Stanley P. Gudder. Partial algebraic structures associated with orthomodular posets. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 41(3):717-730, 1972. URL: https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1972.41.717.
  15. Joe Henson. Quantum contextuality from a simple principle? arXiV preprint arXiv:1210.5978 [quant-ph], 2012. Google Scholar
  16. Richard I. G. Hughes. The structure and interpretation of quantum mechanics. Harvard University Press, 1989. Google Scholar
  17. Chris J. Isham and Jeremy Butterfield. Topos perspective on the Kochen-Specker theorem: I. Quantum states as generalized valuations. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 37(11):2669-2733, 1998. Google Scholar
  18. Peter T. Johnstone. Topos theory, volume 10 of London Mathematical Society Monographs. Academic Press, 1997. Google Scholar
  19. Gudrun Kalmbach. Orthomodular lattices, volume 18 of London Mathematical Society Monographs. Academic Press, 1983. Google Scholar
  20. Simon Kochen. A reconstruction of quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 45(5):557-590, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-015-9886-5.
  21. Simon Kochen and Ernst P. Specker. The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17(1):59-87, 1967. Google Scholar
  22. Patricia F. Lock and Gary M. Hardegree. Connections among quantum logics. Part 1. Quantum propositional logics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 24(1):43-53, 1985. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00670072.
  23. Sandu Popescu and Daniel Rohrlich. Quantum nonlocality as an axiom. Foundations of Physics, 24(3):379-385, 1994. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02058098.
  24. Ravishankar Ramanathan, Akihito Soeda, Paweł Kurzyński, and Dagomir Kaszlikowski. Generalized monogamy of contextual inequalities from the no-disturbance principle. Physical Review Letters, 109(5):050404, 2012. URL: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.050404.
  25. Benno van den Berg and Chris Heunen. Noncommutativity as a colimit. Applied Categorical Structures, 20(4):393-414, 2012. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10485-011-9246-3.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail