In a precise data race detector, a race is detected only if the execution exhibits a real race. In such tools, every memory access from each thread is typically checked by a happens-before algorithm. What’s the optimal runtime performance of such tools? In this paper, we identify that a significant percentage of memory access checks in real-world program executions are often redundant: removing these checks affects neither the precision nor the capability of race detection. We show that if all such redundant checks were eliminated with no cost, the optimal performance of a state-of-the-art dynamic race detector, FastTrack, could be improved by 90%, reducing its runtime overhead from 68X to 7X on a collection of CPU intensive benchmarks. We further develop a purely dynamic technique, ReX, that efficiently filters out redundant checks and apply it to FastTrack. With ReX, the runtime performance of FastTrack is improved by 31% on average.
@InProceedings{huang_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.15, author = {Huang, Jeff and Rajagopalan, Arun K.}, title = {{What'’s the Optimal Performance of Precise Dynamic Race Detection? –A Redundancy Perspective}}, booktitle = {31st European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2017)}, pages = {15:1--15:22}, series = {Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)}, ISBN = {978-3-95977-035-4}, ISSN = {1868-8969}, year = {2017}, volume = {74}, editor = {M\"{u}ller, Peter}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik}, address = {Dagstuhl, Germany}, URL = {https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.15}, URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-72722}, doi = {10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.15}, annote = {Keywords: Data Race Detection, Dynamic Analysis, Concurrency, Redundancy} }
Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing