A Combinatorial Proof of Ihara-Bass's Formula for the Zeta Function of Regular Graphs

Author Bharatram Rangarajan



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2017.46.pdf
  • Filesize: 431 kB
  • 13 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Bharatram Rangarajan

Cite AsGet BibTex

Bharatram Rangarajan. A Combinatorial Proof of Ihara-Bass's Formula for the Zeta Function of Regular Graphs. In 37th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 93, pp. 46:1-46:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2017.46

Abstract

We give an elementary combinatorial proof of Bass's determinant formula for the zeta function of a finite regular graph. This is done by expressing the number of non-backtracking cycles of a given length in terms of Chebyshev polynomials in the eigenvalues of the adjacency operator of the graph. A related observation of independent interest is that the Ramanujan property of a regular graph is equivalent to tight bounds on the number of non-backtracking cycles of every length.
Keywords
  • non-backtracking
  • Ihara zeta
  • Chebyshev polynomial
  • Ramanujan graph
  • Hashimoto matrix

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Noga Alon, Itai Benjamini, Eyal Lubetzky, and Sasha Sodin. Non-backtracking random walks mix faster. Communications in Contemporary Mathematics, 9(04):585-603, 2007. Google Scholar
  2. Hyman Bass. The ihara-selberg zeta function of a tree lattice. International Journal of Mathematics, 3(06):717-797, 1992. Google Scholar
  3. Giuliana Davidoff, Peter Sarnak, and Alain Valette. Elementary number theory, group theory and Ramanujan graphs, volume 55. Cambridge University Press, 2003. Google Scholar
  4. Dominique Foata and Doron Zeilberger. A combinatorial proof of bass’s evaluations of the ihara-selberg zeta function for graphs. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 351(6):2257-2274, 1999. Google Scholar
  5. Ki-ichiro Hashimoto. Zeta functions of finite graphs and representations of p-adic groups. Automorphic forms and geometry of arithmetic varieties., pages 211-280, 1989. Google Scholar
  6. Shlomo Hoory, Nathan Linial, and Avi Wigderson. Expander graphs and their applications. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 43(4):439-561, 2006. Google Scholar
  7. Yasutaka Ihara. On discrete subgroups of the two by two projective linear group over p-adic fields. Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan, 18(3):219-235, 1966. Google Scholar
  8. Mark Kempton. Non-backtracking random walks and a weighted ihara’s theorem. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.05553, 2016. Google Scholar
  9. Motoko Kotani and Toshikazu Sunada. Zeta functions of finite graphs. J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, 7:7-25, 2000. Google Scholar
  10. Eyal Lubetzky and Yuval Peres. Cutoff on all ramanujan graphs. Geometric and Functional Analysis, 26(4):1190-1216, 2016. Google Scholar
  11. Alexander Lubotzky, Ralph Phillips, and Peter Sarnak. Ramanujan graphs. Combinatorica, 8(3):261-277, 1988. Google Scholar
  12. Avinoam Mann. How groups grow, volume 395. Cambridge university press, 2011. Google Scholar
  13. Adam Marcus, Daniel A Spielman, and Nikhil Srivastava. Interlacing families i: Bipartite ramanujan graphs of all degrees. In Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on, pages 529-537. IEEE, 2013. Google Scholar
  14. Moshe Morgenstern. Existence and explicit constructions of q+ 1 regular ramanujan graphs for every prime power q. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 62(1):44-62, 1994. Google Scholar
  15. M Ram Murty. Ramanujan graphs. Journal-Ramanujan Mathematical Society, 18(1):33-52, 2003. Google Scholar
  16. Alon Nilli. On the second eigenvalue of a graph. Discrete Mathematics, 91(2):207-210, 1991. Google Scholar
  17. Harold M Stark and Audrey A Terras. Zeta functions of finite graphs and coverings. Advances in Mathematics, 121(1):124-165, 1996. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail