Variations on the Tournament Problem

Authors Fabrizio Luccio, Linda Pagli, Nicola Santoro



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.FUN.2024.20.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.95 MB
  • 11 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Fabrizio Luccio
  • University of Pisa, Italy
Linda Pagli
  • University of Pisa, Italy
Nicola Santoro
  • Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada

Cite AsGet BibTex

Fabrizio Luccio, Linda Pagli, and Nicola Santoro. Variations on the Tournament Problem. In 12th International Conference on Fun with Algorithms (FUN 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 291, pp. 20:1-20:11, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FUN.2024.20

Abstract

In 1883, Lewis Carrol wrote a newspaper article to criticize how the second best player was determined in a tennis tournament, and to suggest how such a task could be done correctly. This article has been taken by Donald Knuth as the inspiration for efficiently determining the smallest t elements of a totally ordered set of size n using k-comparisons. In the ensuing research, optimal algorithms for some low values of k and t have been established, by Knuth and Aigner; for k = 2 and t ≤ 3, a few new bounds have been established for special values of n. Surprisingly, very little else is known on this problem, in spite of its illustrious pedigree and its relationship to other classical problems (e.g., selection and sorting with k-sorters). Enticed by the undeniable beauty of the problem, and the obvious promise of fun, we have joined the investigative quest. The purpose of this paper is to share some new results obtained so far. We are glad to report advances in two directions.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Design and analysis of algorithms
  • Computing methodologies → Parallel algorithms
  • Mathematics of computing → Discrete mathematics
Keywords
  • algorithms
  • parallel algorithms
  • tournament
  • selection
  • ranking

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Martin Aigner. Selecting the top three elements. Discrete Apllied Math., 4:247-267, 1982. Google Scholar
  2. Richard Beigel and John Gill. Sorting n objects with a k-sorter. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 39:714-716, 1990. Google Scholar
  3. D.Kirkpatrick. Closing a Long-standing Complexity Gap for Selection, volume 8066. LNTCS Springer, 2013. Google Scholar
  4. Charles L. Dodgson. The fallacies of lown tennis tournaments. St. James Gazette, 1:5-6, 1883. Google Scholar
  5. Donald E.Knuth. The Art of Computer Programming, Vol 3. Addison Wesley, 1973. Google Scholar
  6. Jutta Eusterbrock. Errata to "selecting the top three elements by m. aigner: A result of a computer-assisted proof search". Discrete Applied Math., 41:131-137, 1993. Google Scholar
  7. Susumu Horiguci and Willard L. Miranker. On parallel algorithm for finding the maximum value. Parallel Computing, 10:101-108, 1989. Google Scholar
  8. Andras Ivanyi and Norbert Fogarasi. On partial sorting in restricted rounds. Acta Univ. Sapientiae, Informatica, 9:17-34, 2017. Google Scholar
  9. Bruce Parker and Ian Parberry. Costructinfg sorting networks from k-sorters. Information Processing Letteers, 33:157-162, 1989. Google Scholar
  10. Yo Shiloach and Uzi Vishkin. Finding the maximum, merging, and sorting in a parallel computational model. Journal of Algorithms, 2(88):88-102, 1981. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail