Document Open Access Logo

OpenPOI: An Open Place of Interest Platform (Short Paper)

Authors Grant McKenzie, Krzysztof Janowicz



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.GISCIENCE.2018.47.pdf
  • Filesize: 341 kB
  • 6 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Grant McKenzie
  • Department of Geography, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
Krzysztof Janowicz
  • STKO Lab, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA

Cite AsGet BibTex

Grant McKenzie and Krzysztof Janowicz. OpenPOI: An Open Place of Interest Platform (Short Paper). In 10th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 114, pp. 47:1-47:6, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.GISCIENCE.2018.47

Abstract

Places of Interest (POI) are a principal component of how human behavior is captured in today's geographic information. Increasingly, access to POI datasets are being restricted - even silo-ed - for commercial use, with vendors often impeding access to the very users that contribute the data. Open mapping platforms such as OpenStreetMap (OSM) offer access to a plethora of geospatial data though they can be limited in the attribute resolution or range of information associated with the data. Nuanced descriptive information associated with POI, e.g., ambience, are not captured by such platforms. Furthermore, interactions with a POI, such as checking in, or recommending a menu item, are inherently place-based concepts. Many of these interactions occur with high temporal volatility that involves frequent interaction with a platform, arguably inappropriate for the "changeset" model adopted by OSM and related datasets. In this short paper we propose OpenPOI, an open platform for storing, serving, and interacting with places of interests and the activities they afford.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Information systems → Geographic information systems
Keywords
  • place
  • point of interest
  • open data
  • gazetteer
  • check-in

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Josh Constine. Facebook restricts apis, axes old instagram platform amidst scandals. TechCrunch, April 2018. Online; 04-04-2018. Google Scholar
  2. The Economist. The battle for territory in digital cartography. The Economist, June 2017. Online; 08-06-2017. Google Scholar
  3. Michael F Goodchild and Linda L Hill. Introduction to digital gazetteer research. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(10):1039-1044, 2008. Google Scholar
  4. James M Hargett. Song dynasty local gazetteers and their place in the history of difangzhi writing. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 56(2):405-442, 1996. Google Scholar
  5. Grant McKenzie and Krzysztof Janowicz. Coerced geographic information: The not-so-voluntary side of user-generated geo-content. In Eighth international conference on geographic information science, 2014. Google Scholar
  6. Grant McKenzie, Krzysztof Janowicz, and Benjamin Adams. A weighted multi-attribute method for matching user-generated points of interest. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41(2):125-137, 2014. Google Scholar
  7. Greg Miller. The huge, unseen operation behind the accuracy of google maps. The Economist, December 2014. Online; 08-12-2014. Google Scholar
  8. Jennifer C Molloy. The open knowledge foundation: open data means better science. PLoS biology, 9(12):e1001195, 2011. Google Scholar
  9. Jack Nicas. Google rival yelp claims search giant broke promise made to regulators. The Wall Street Journal, September 2017. Online; 11-09-2017. Google Scholar
  10. Tessio Novack, Robin Peters, and Alexander Zipf. Graph-based matching of points-of-interest from collaborative geo-datasets. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(3):117, 2018. Google Scholar
  11. Google Support. Popular times, wait times, and visit duration. Technical report, Alphabet Inc., 2016. Accessed: 28-04-2018. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail