Document Open Access Logo

Building Alternative Indices of Socioeconomic Status for Population Modeling in Data-Sparse Contexts (Short Paper)

Authors Angela R. Cunningham , Joseph V. Tuccillo , Tyler J. Frazier



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.GIScience.2023.25.pdf
  • Filesize: 7.79 MB
  • 7 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Angela R. Cunningham
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN, USA
Joseph V. Tuccillo
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN, USA
Tyler J. Frazier
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN, USA

Acknowledgements

Our thanks to Daniel Adams and Clinton Stipek. This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).

Cite AsGet BibTex

Angela R. Cunningham, Joseph V. Tuccillo, and Tyler J. Frazier. Building Alternative Indices of Socioeconomic Status for Population Modeling in Data-Sparse Contexts (Short Paper). In 12th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 277, pp. 25:1-25:7, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.GIScience.2023.25

Abstract

Population modeling requires clear definitions of socioeconomic status (SES) to ensure overall estimate accuracy and locate potentially underserved subpopulations. This presents a challenge as SES can be measured in myriad ways and for divergent purposes, and the data required to calculate these metrics may be lacking, particularly in low and middle income countries (LMICs). To support more refined SES measurement, we explore improvements upon the Demographic and Health Survey’s (DHS) Wealth Index (DHS-WI) using alternative characterizations of SES based on multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and hierarchical clustering. We produce the MCA-derived metrics first on a full suite of household economic, demographic, and dwelling variables, then on a reduced set of occupant-only SES characteristics. We explore the utility of these metrics relative to DHS-WI based on their ability to 1) differentiate DHS household types and 2) identify mixtures of SES levels within DHS samples and mapped at high spatial resolution. We find that our full suite MCA yields more clearly defined SES segments and that our reduced MCA delineates occupant SES most clearly, suggesting potential pathways to improve upon the DHS-WI in future population modeling efforts for LMICs.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Information systems → Geographic information systems
Keywords
  • Demographic and Health Survey
  • multiple correspondence analysis
  • population modeling
  • socioeconomic status
  • spatial statistics

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Adrian Baddeley, Ege Rubak, and Rolf Turner. Spatial point patterns: methodology and applications with R. CRC press, 2015. Google Scholar
  2. Abhijit V. Banerjee and Esther Duflo. What is middle class about the middle classes around the world? The Journal of Economic Perspectives: A Journal of the American Economic Association, 22(2):3-28, 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.2.3.
  3. Guanghua Chi, Han Fang, Sourav Chatterjee, and Joshua E. Blumenstock. Microestimates of wealth for all low- and middle-income countries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(3):e2113658119, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2113658119.
  4. P.J. Diggle. Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns. Hodder Education, 2003. Google Scholar
  5. Ghana Statistical Service, Ghana Health Service, and ICF International. Ghana 2014 Demographic and Health Survey [Dataset]. GHPR72FL.DTA, 2015. URL: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/SR224/SR224.pdf.
  6. Ghana Statistical Service GSS, Ghana Health Service GHS, and ICF International. Ghana demographic and health survey 2014. Technical report, Ghana Statistical Service - GSS, Rockville, Maryland, USA, 2015. URL: http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR307/FR307.pdf.
  7. Francois Husson, Julie Josse, Sebastien Le, and Jeremy Mazet. FactoMineR: multivariate exploratory data analysis and data mining, 2022. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=FactoMineR.
  8. Charles I. Jones and Peter J. Klenow. Beyond GDP? Welfare across countries and time. American Economic Review, 106(9):2426-2457, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20110236.
  9. Homi Kharas. The unprecedented expansion of the global middle class: an update. Global Economy and Development Working Paper 100, Global Economy and Development at the Brookings Institution, 2017. URL: https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-unprecedented-expansion-of-the-global-middle-class-2/.
  10. Dalton Lunga, Jacob Arndt, Jonathan Gerrand, and Robert Stewart. Resflow: A remote sensing imagery data-flow for improved model generalization. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14:10468-10483, 2021. Google Scholar
  11. Jari Oksanen, Gavin L. Simpson, F. Guillaume Blanchet, Roeland Kindt, Pierre Legendre, Peter R. Minchin, R. B. O'Hara, Peter Solymos, M. Henry H. Stevens, Eduard Szoecs, Helene Wagner, Matt Barbour, Michael Bedward, Ben Bolker, Daniel Borcard, Gustavo Carvalho, Michael Chirico, Miquel De Caceres, Sebastien Durand, Heloisa Beatriz Antoniazi Evangelista, Rich FitzJohn, Michael Friendly, Brendan Furneaux, Geoffrey Hannigan, Mark O. Hill, Leo Lahti, Dan McGlinn, Marie-Helene Ouellette, Eduardo Ribeiro Cunha, Tyler Smith, Adrian Stier, Cajo J. F. Ter Braak, and James Weedon. vegan: Community Ecology Package, 2022. URL: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html.
  12. Mathieu J. P. Poirier, Karen A. Grépin, and Michel Grignon. Approaches and alternatives to the Wealth Index to measure socioeconomic status using survey data: a critical interpretive synthesis. Social Indicators Research, 148(1):1-46, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02187-9.
  13. Shea O. Rutstein and Kiersten Johnson. The DHS wealth index. DHS Comparative Report DHS Comparative Reports No. 6, ORC Macro, Calverton, Maryland, 2004. URL: https://www.dhsprogram.com/publications/publication-cr6-comparative-reports.cfm.
  14. Jeroen Smits and Roel Steendijk. The International Wealth Index (IWI). Social Indicators Research, 122:65-85, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0683-x.
  15. Dana R. Thomson, Forrest R. Stevens, Robert Chen, Gregory Yetman, Alessandro Sorichetta, and Andrea E. Gaughan. Improving the accuracy of gridded population estimates in cities and slums to monitor SDG 11: Evidence from a simulation study in Namibia. Land Use Policy, 123, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106392.
  16. Pierre Traissac and Yves Martin-Prevel. Alternatives to principal components analysis to derive asset-based indices to measure socio-economic position in low- and middle-income countries: the case for multiple correspondence analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology, 41(4):1207-1208, 2012. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys122.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail