Understanding Place Identity with Generative AI (Short Paper)

Authors Kee Moon Jang , Junda Chen, Yuhao Kang , Junghwan Kim , Jinhyung Lee , Fábio Duarte



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.GIScience.2023.41.pdf
  • Filesize: 4.63 MB
  • 6 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Kee Moon Jang
  • MIT Senseable City Lab, Cambridge, MA, USA
Junda Chen
  • DataChat, Madison, WI, USA
Yuhao Kang
  • MIT Senseable City Lab, Cambridge, MA, USA
Junghwan Kim
  • Department of Geography, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Jinhyung Lee
  • Department of Geography and Environment, Western University, London, Canada
Fábio Duarte
  • MIT Senseable City Lab, Cambridge, MA, USA

Cite AsGet BibTex

Kee Moon Jang, Junda Chen, Yuhao Kang, Junghwan Kim, Jinhyung Lee, and Fábio Duarte. Understanding Place Identity with Generative AI (Short Paper). In 12th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 277, pp. 41:1-41:6, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.GIScience.2023.41

Abstract

Researchers are constantly leveraging new forms of data to understand how people perceive the built environment and the collective place identity of cities. Latest advancements in generative artificial intelligence (AI) models have enabled the creation of realistic representations of real-world settings. In this study, we explore the potential of generative AI as the source of textual and visual information in capturing the place identity of cities assessed by filtered descriptions and images. We asked questions on the place identity of a set of 31 global cities to two generative AI models, ChatGPT and DALL·E2. Since generative AI has raised ethical concerns regarding its trustworthiness, we performed cross-validation to examine whether the results show similar patterns to real urban settings. In particular, we compared the outputs with Wikipedia data for text and images searched from Google for images. Our results indicate that generative AI models have the potential to capture the collective features of cities that can make them distinguishable. This study is among the first attempts to explore the capabilities of generative AI in understanding human perceptions of the built environment. It contributes to urban design literature by discussing future research opportunities and potential limitations.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Social and professional topics → Geographic characteristics
Keywords
  • ChatGPT
  • DALL·E2
  • place identity
  • generative artificial intelligence
  • sense of place

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. David Canter. The psychology of place. St Martin'S Press, 1977. Google Scholar
  2. Song Gao, Krzysztof Janowicz, Daniel R Montello, Yingjie Hu, Jiue-An Yang, Grant McKenzie, Yiting Ju, Li Gong, Benjamin Adams, and Bo Yan. A data-synthesis-driven method for detecting and extracting vague cognitive regions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31(6):1245-1271, 2017. Google Scholar
  3. Yingjie Hu, Chengbin Deng, and Zhou Zhou. A semantic and sentiment analysis on online neighborhood reviews for understanding the perceptions of people toward their living environments. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109(4):1052-1073, 2019. Google Scholar
  4. Kee Moon Jang and Youngchul Kim. Crowd-sourced cognitive mapping: A new way of displaying people’s cognitive perception of urban space. Plos one, 14(6):e0218590, 2019. Google Scholar
  5. Yuhao Kang, Qianheng Zhang, and Robert Roth. The ethics of ai-generated maps: A study of dalle 2 and implications for cartography. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10743, 2023. Google Scholar
  6. Junghwan Kim and Jinhyung Lee. How does chatgpt introduce transport problems and solutions in north america? Findings, 2023. Google Scholar
  7. Ehsan Latif, Gengchen Mai, Matthew Nyaaba, Xuansheng Wu, Ninghao Liu, Guoyu Lu, Sheng Li, Tianming Liu, and Xiaoming Zhai. Artificial general intelligence (agi) for education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12479, 2023. Google Scholar
  8. Gengchen Mai, Weiming Huang, Jin Sun, Suhang Song, Deepak Mishra, Ninghao Liu, Song Gao, Tianming Liu, Gao Cong, Yingjie Hu, et al. On the opportunities and challenges of foundation models for geospatial artificial intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06798, 2023. Google Scholar
  9. Lynne C Manzo and Douglas D Perkins. Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of planning literature, 20(4):335-350, 2006. Google Scholar
  10. Mahbubur Meenar, Nader Afzalan, and Amir Hajrasouliha. Analyzing lynch’s city imageability in the digital age. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 42(4):611-623, 2022. Google Scholar
  11. Harold H Proshansky, Abbe K Fabian, and Robert Kaminoff. Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self (1983). In The people, place, and space reader, pages 111-115. Routledge, 2014. Google Scholar
  12. Edward Relph. Place and placelessness, volume 67. Pion London, 1976. Google Scholar
  13. Sachith Seneviratne, Damith Senanayake, Sanka Rasnayaka, Rajith Vidanaarachchi, and Jason Thompson. Dalle-urban: Capturing the urban design expertise of large text to image transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.04139, 2022. Google Scholar
  14. Eva AM van Dis, Johan Bollen, Willem Zuidema, Robert van Rooij, and Claudi L Bockting. Chatgpt: five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947):224-226, 2023. Google Scholar
  15. Dongjie Wang, Chang-Tien Lu, and Yanjie Fu. Towards automated urban planning: When generative and chatgpt-like ai meets urban planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03892, 2023. Google Scholar
  16. Fan Zhang, Bolei Zhou, Carlo Ratti, and Yu Liu. Discovering place-informative scenes and objects using social media photos. Royal Society open science, 6(3):181375, 2019. Google Scholar
  17. Fan Zhang, Jinyan Zu, Mingyuan Hu, Di Zhu, Yuhao Kang, Song Gao, Yi Zhang, and Zhou Huang. Uncovering inconspicuous places using social media check-ins and street view images. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 81:101478, 2020. Google Scholar
  18. Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A Efros, Eli Shechtman, and Oliver Wang. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 586-595, 2018. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail