Document

# Fundamental Problems on Bounded-Treewidth Graphs: The Real Source of Hardness

## File

LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.34.pdf
• Filesize: 0.81 MB
• 17 pages

## Cite As

Barış Can Esmer, Jacob Focke, Dániel Marx, and Paweł Rzążewski. Fundamental Problems on Bounded-Treewidth Graphs: The Real Source of Hardness. In 51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 297, pp. 34:1-34:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.34

## Abstract

It is known for many algorithmic problems that if a tree decomposition of width t is given in the input, then the problem can be solved with exponential dependence on t. A line of research initiated by Lokshtanov, Marx, and Saurabh [SODA 2011] produced lower bounds showing that in many cases known algorithms already achieve the best possible exponential dependence on t, assuming the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH). The main message of this paper is showing that the same lower bounds can already be obtained in a much more restricted setting: informally, a graph consisting of a block of t vertices connected to components of constant size already has the same hardness as a general tree decomposition of width t. Formally, a (σ,δ)-hub is a set Q of vertices such that every component of Q has size at most σ and is adjacent to at most δ vertices of Q. We explore if the known tight lower bounds parameterized by the width of the given tree decomposition remain valid if we parameterize by the size of the given hub. - For every ε > 0, there are σ,δ > 0 such that Independent Set (equivalently Vertex Cover) cannot be solved in time (2-ε)^p⋅ n, even if a (σ, δ)-hub of size p is given in the input, assuming the SETH. This matches the earlier tight lower bounds parameterized by width of the tree decomposition. Similar tight bounds are obtained for Odd Cycle Transversal, Max Cut, q-Coloring, and edge/vertex deletions versions of q-Coloring. - For every ε > 0, there are σ,δ > 0 such that △-Partition cannot be solved in time (2-ε)^p ⋅ n, even if a (σ, δ)-hub of size p is given in the input, assuming the Set Cover Conjecture (SCC). In fact, we prove that this statement is equivalent to the SCC, thus it is unlikely that this could be proved assuming the SETH. - For Dominating Set, we can prove a non-tight lower bound ruling out (2-ε)^p ⋅ n^𝒪(1) algorithms, assuming either the SETH or the SCC, but this does not match the 3^p⋅ n^{𝒪(1)} upper bound. Thus our results reveal that, for many problems, the research on lower bounds on the dependence on tree width was never really about tree decompositions, but the real source of hardness comes from a much simpler structure. Additionally, we study if the same lower bounds can be obtained if σ and δ are fixed universal constants (not depending on ε). We show that lower bounds of this form are possible for Max Cut and the edge-deletion version of q-Coloring, under the Max 3-Sat Hypothesis (M3SH). However, no such lower bounds are possible for Independent Set, Odd Cycle Transversal, and the vertex-deletion version of q-Coloring: better than brute force algorithms are possible for every fixed (σ,δ).

## Subject Classification

##### ACM Subject Classification
• Theory of computation → Parameterized complexity and exact algorithms
##### Keywords
• Parameterized Complexity
• Tight Bounds
• Hub
• Treewidth
• Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis
• Vertex Coloring
• Vertex Deletion
• Edge Deletion
• Triangle Packing
• Triangle Partition
• Set Cover Hypothesis
• Dominating Set

## Metrics

• Access Statistics
• Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
0

## References

1. Jørgen Bang-Jensen, Eduard Eiben, Gregory Z. Gutin, Magnus Wahlström, and Anders Yeo. Component order connectivity in directed graphs. Algorithmica, 84(9):2767-2784, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-022-01004-z.
2. Andreas Björklund. Exact Covers via Determinants. In Jean-Yves Marion and Thomas Schwentick, editors, 27th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, volume 5 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 95-106, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2010. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2010.2447.
3. F. Boesch, D. Gross, and C. Suffel. Component order connectivity. In Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth Southeastern International Conference on Combinatorics, Graph Theory and Computing (Boca Raton, FL, 1998), volume 131, pages 145-155, 1998.
4. Glencora Borradaile and Hung Le. Optimal dynamic program for r-domination problems over tree decompositions. In Jiong Guo and Danny Hermelin, editors, 11th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation, IPEC 2016, August 24-26, 2016, Aarhus, Denmark, volume 63 of LIPIcs, pages 8:1-8:23. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2016.8.
5. Bruno Courcelle. The monadic second-order logic of graphs. i. recognizable sets of finite graphs. Inf. Comput., 85(1):12-75, 1990. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-5401(90)90043-H.
6. Christophe Crespelle, Pål Grønås Drange, Fedor V. Fomin, and Petr A. Golovach. A survey of parameterized algorithms and the complexity of edge modification. Comput. Sci. Rev., 48:100556, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100556.
7. Radu Curticapean, Nathan Lindzey, and Jesper Nederlof. A tight lower bound for counting Hamiltonian cycles via matrix rank. In Artur Czumaj, editor, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2018, New Orleans, LA, USA, January 7-10, 2018, pages 1080-1099. SIAM, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611975031.70.
8. Radu Curticapean and Dániel Marx. Tight conditional lower bounds for counting perfect matchings on graphs of bounded treewidth, cliquewidth, and genus. In Robert Krauthgamer, editor, Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2016, Arlington, VA, USA, January 10-12, 2016, pages 1650-1669. SIAM, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611974331.ch113.
9. Marek Cygan, Holger Dell, Daniel Lokshtanov, Dániel Marx, Jesper Nederlof, Yoshio Okamoto, Ramamohan Paturi, Saket Saurabh, and Magnus Wahlström. On Problems as Hard as CNF-SAT. ACM Transactions on Algorithms, 12(3):41:1-41:24, May 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2925416.
10. Marek Cygan, Fedor V. Fomin, Lukasz Kowalik, Daniel Lokshtanov, Dániel Marx, Marcin Pilipczuk, Michal Pilipczuk, and Saket Saurabh. Parameterized Algorithms. Springer, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21275-3.
11. László Egri, Dániel Marx, and Paweł Rzążewski. Finding list homomorphisms from bounded-treewidth graphs to reflexive graphs: a complete complexity characterization. In Rolf Niedermeier and Brigitte Vallée, editors, 35th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2018, February 28 to March 3, 2018, Caen, France, volume 96 of LIPIcs, pages 27:1-27:15. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2018.27.
12. Jacob Focke, Dániel Marx, Fionn Mc Inerney, Daniel Neuen, Govind S. Sankar, Philipp Schepper, and Philip Wellnitz. Tight complexity bounds for counting generalized dominating sets in bounded-treewidth graphs. In Nikhil Bansal and Viswanath Nagarajan, editors, Proceedings of the 2023 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2023, Florence, Italy, January 22-25, 2023, pages 3664-3683. SIAM, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch140.
13. Jacob Focke, Dániel Marx, and Paweł Rzążewski. Counting list homomorphisms from graphs of bounded treewidth: tight complexity bounds. In Joseph (Seffi) Naor and Niv Buchbinder, editors, Proceedings of the 2022 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2022, Virtual Conference / Alexandria, VA, USA, January 9 - 12, 2022, pages 431-458. SIAM, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977073.22.
14. Daniel Gross, L. William Kazmierczak, John T. Saccoman, Charles L. Suffel, and Antonius Suhartomo. On component order edge connectivity of a complete bipartite graph. Ars Comb., 112:433-448, 2013.
15. Falko Hegerfeld and Stefan Kratsch. Towards exact structural thresholds for parameterized complexity. In Holger Dell and Jesper Nederlof, editors, 17th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation, IPEC 2022, September 7-9, 2022, Potsdam, Germany, volume 249 of LIPIcs, pages 17:1-17:20. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2022.17.
16. Russell Impagliazzo and Ramamohan Paturi. On the complexity of k-SAT. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 62(2):367-375, 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.2000.1727.
17. Russell Impagliazzo, Ramamohan Paturi, and Francis Zane. Which problems have strongly exponential complexity? J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 63(4):512-530, 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.2001.1774.
18. Lars Jaffke and Bart M. P. Jansen. Fine-grained parameterized complexity analysis of graph coloring problems. In Dimitris Fotakis, Aris Pagourtzis, and Vangelis Th. Paschos, editors, Algorithms and Complexity - 10th International Conference, CIAC 2017, Athens, Greece, May 24-26, 2017, Proceedings, volume 10236 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 345-356, 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57586-5_29.
19. Ioannis Katsikarelis, Michael Lampis, and Vangelis Th. Paschos. Structural parameters, tight bounds, and approximation for (k, r)-center. Discret. Appl. Math., 264:90-117, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2018.11.002.
20. Lawrence William Kazmierczak. On the relationship between connectivity and component order connectivity. ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2003. Thesis (Ph.D.)-Stevens Institute of Technology. URL: http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3088817.
21. Mikko Koivisto. Partitioning into sets of bounded cardinality. In Jianer Chen and Fedor V. Fomin, editors, Parameterized and Exact Computation, 4th International Workshop, IWPEC 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark, September 10-11, 2009, Revised Selected Papers, volume 5917 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 258-263. Springer, 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11269-0_21.
22. Mithilesh Kumar and Daniel Lokshtanov. A 2lk kernel for l-component order connectivity. In Jiong Guo and Danny Hermelin, editors, 11th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation, IPEC 2016, August 24-26, 2016, Aarhus, Denmark, volume 63 of LIPIcs, pages 20:1-20:14. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2016.20.
23. Michael Lampis. Finer tight bounds for coloring on clique-width. SIAM J. Discret. Math., 34(3):1538-1558, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/19M1280326.
24. Daniel Lokshtanov, Dániel Marx, and Saket Saurabh. Known algorithms on graphs of bounded treewidth are probably optimal. ACM Trans. Algorithms, 14(2):13:1-13:30, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3170442.
25. Daniel Lokshtanov, Pranabendu Misra, M. S. Ramanujan, Saket Saurabh, and Meirav Zehavi. Fpt-approximation for FPT problems. In Dániel Marx, editor, Proceedings of the 2021 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2021, Virtual Conference, January 10 - 13, 2021, pages 199-218. SIAM, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611976465.14.
26. Dániel Marx, Pranabendu Misra, Daniel Neuen, and Prafullkumar Tale. A framework for parameterized subexponential algorithms for generalized cycle hitting problems on planar graphs. In Proceedings of the 2022 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 2085-2127. [Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)], Philadelphia, PA, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977073.83.
27. Dániel Marx, Govind S. Sankar, and Philipp Schepper. Degrees and gaps: Tight complexity results of general factor problems parameterized by treewidth and cutwidth. In Nikhil Bansal, Emanuela Merelli, and James Worrell, editors, 48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2021, July 12-16, 2021, Glasgow, Scotland (Virtual Conference), volume 198 of LIPIcs, pages 95:1-95:20. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.95.
28. Dániel Marx, Govind S. Sankar, and Philipp Schepper. Anti-factor is FPT parameterized by treewidth and list size (but counting is hard). In Holger Dell and Jesper Nederlof, editors, 17th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation, IPEC 2022, September 7-9, 2022, Potsdam, Germany, volume 249 of LIPIcs, pages 22:1-22:23. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2022.22.
29. Moni Naor, Leonard J. Schulman, and Aravind Srinivasan. Splitters and near-optimal derandomization. In 36th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA, 23-25 October 1995, pages 182-191. IEEE Computer Society, 1995. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1995.492475.
30. Jesper Nederlof. Finding Large Set Covers Faster via the Representation Method. In Piotr Sankowski and Christos Zaroliagis, editors, 24th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2016), volume 57 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 69:1-69:15, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2016. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2016.69.
31. Karolina Okrasa, Marta Piecyk, and Paweł Rzążewski. Full complexity classification of the list homomorphism problem for bounded-treewidth graphs. In Fabrizio Grandoni, Grzegorz Herman, and Peter Sanders, editors, 28th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms, ESA 2020, September 7-9, 2020, Pisa, Italy (Virtual Conference), volume 173 of LIPIcs, pages 74:1-74:24. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2020.74.
32. Karolina Okrasa and Paweł Rzążewski. Fine-grained complexity of the graph homomorphism problem for bounded-treewidth graphs. SIAM J. Comput., 50(2):487-508, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1320146.
33. Masataka Shirahashi and Naoyuki Kamiyama. Kernelization algorithms for a generalization of the component order connectivity problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Japan, 66(2):112-129, 2023.
34. Dekel Tsur. Faster parameterized algorithms for two vertex deletion problems. Theoretical Computer Science, 940:112-123, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2022.10.044.
35. Johan M. M. van Rooij. Fast algorithms for join operations on tree decompositions. In Fedor V. Fomin, Stefan Kratsch, and Erik Jan van Leeuwen, editors, Treewidth, Kernels, and Algorithms - Essays Dedicated to Hans L. Bodlaender on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday, volume 12160 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 262-297. Springer, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42071-0_18.
36. Johan M. M. van Rooij, Hans L. Bodlaender, and Peter Rossmanith. Dynamic programming on tree decompositions using generalised fast subset convolution. In Amos Fiat and Peter Sanders, editors, Algorithms - ESA 2009, 17th Annual European Symposium, Copenhagen, Denmark, September 7-9, 2009. Proceedings, volume 5757 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 566-577. Springer, 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04128-0_51.
37. M. Yatauro. Component order connectivity and vertex degrees. Congr. Numer., 220:195-205, 2014.