Document

# Deterministic Treasure Hunt in the Plane with Angular Hints

## File

LIPIcs.ISAAC.2018.48.pdf
• Filesize: 0.51 MB
• 13 pages

## Cite As

Sébastien Bouchard, Yoann Dieudonné, Andrzej Pelc, and Franck Petit. Deterministic Treasure Hunt in the Plane with Angular Hints. In 29th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 123, pp. 48:1-48:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2018.48

## Abstract

A mobile agent equipped with a compass and a measure of length has to find an inert treasure in the Euclidean plane. Both the agent and the treasure are modeled as points. In the beginning, the agent is at a distance at most D>0 from the treasure, but knows neither the distance nor any bound on it. Finding the treasure means getting at distance at most 1 from it. The agent makes a series of moves. Each of them consists in moving straight in a chosen direction at a chosen distance. In the beginning and after each move the agent gets a hint consisting of a positive angle smaller than 2 pi whose vertex is at the current position of the agent and within which the treasure is contained. We investigate the problem of how these hints permit the agent to lower the cost of finding the treasure, using a deterministic algorithm, where the cost is the worst-case total length of the agent's trajectory. It is well known that without any hint the optimal (worst case) cost is Theta(D^2). We show that if all angles given as hints are at most pi, then the cost can be lowered to O(D), which is optimal. If all angles are at most beta, where beta<2 pi is a constant unknown to the agent, then the cost is at most O(D^{2-epsilon}), for some epsilon>0. For both these positive results we present deterministic algorithms achieving the above costs. Finally, if angles given as hints can be arbitrary, smaller than 2 pi, then we show that cost Theta(D^2) cannot be beaten.

## Subject Classification

##### ACM Subject Classification
• Theory of computation → Design and analysis of algorithms
• Computing methodologies → Mobile agents
##### Keywords
• treasure hunt
• deterministic algorithm
• mobile agent
• hint
• plane

## Metrics

• Access Statistics
• Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
0

## References

1. Oswin Aichholzer, Franz Aurenhammer, Christian Icking, Rolf Klein, Elmar Langetepe, and Günter Rote. Generalized self-approaching curves. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 109(1-2):3-24, 2001.
2. Steve Alpern and Shmuel Gal. The Theory of Search Games and Rendezvous. Kluwer Academic Publications, 2003.
3. Ricardo A. Baeza-Yates, Joseph C. Culberson, and Gregory J. E. Rawlins. Searching in the Plane. Inf. Comput., 106(2):234-252, 1993.
4. Anatole Beck and D.J. Newman. Yet more on the linear search problem. Israel J. Math., 8:419-429, 1970.
5. Lucas Boczkowski, Amos Korman, and Yoav Rodeh. Searching a Tree with Permanently Noisy Advice. In 26th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms, ESA 2018, August 20-22, 2018, Helsinki, Finland, pages 54:1-54:13, 2018.
6. Anthony Bonato and Richard Nowakowski. The Game of Cops and Robbers on Graphs. American Mathematical Society, 2011.
7. Timothy H. Chung, Geoffrey A. Hollinger, and Volkan Isler. Search and pursuit-evasion in mobile robotics - A survey. Auton. Robots, 31(4):299-316, 2011.
8. Erik D. Demaine, Sándor P. Fekete, and Shmuel Gal. Online searching with turn cost. Theor. Comput. Sci., 361(2-3):342-355, 2006.
9. Yuval Emek, Tobias Langner, David Stolz, Jara Uitto, and Roger Wattenhofer. How many ants does it take to find the food? Theor. Comput. Sci., 608:255-267, 2015.
10. G. Matthew Fricke, Joshua P. Hecker, Antonio D. Griego, Linh T. Tran, and Melanie E. Moses. A distributed deterministic spiral search algorithm for swarms. In 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2016, Daejeon, South Korea, October 9-14, 2016, pages 4430-4436, 2016.
11. Branko Grünbaum. Partitions of mass-distributions and convex bodies by hyperplanes. Pacific J. Math., 10:1257-1261, 1960.
12. Artur Jez and Jakub Lopuszanski. On the two-dimensional cow search problem. Inf. Process. Lett., 109(11):543-547, 2009.
13. Ming-Yang Kao, John H. Reif, and Stephen R. Tate. Searching in an Unknown Environment: An Optimal Randomized Algorithm for the Cow-Path Problem. Inf. Comput., 131(1):63-79, 1996.
14. Elmar Langetepe. On the Optimality of Spiral Search. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2010, Austin, Texas, USA, January 17-19, 2010, pages 1-12, 2010.
15. Elmar Langetepe. Searching for an axis-parallel shoreline. Theor. Comput. Sci., 447:85-99, 2012.
16. Tobias Langner, Barbara Keller, Jara Uitto, and Roger Wattenhofer. Overcoming Obstacles with Ants. In 19th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems, OPODIS 2015, December 14-17, 2015, Rennes, France, pages 9:1-9:17, 2015.
17. Avery Miller and Andrzej Pelc. Tradeoffs between cost and information for rendezvous and treasure hunt. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput., 83:159-167, 2015.
18. Kevin Spieser and Emilio Frazzoli. The Cow-Path Game: A competitive vehicle routing problem. In Proceedings of the 51th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, CDC 2012, December 10-13, 2012, Maui, HI, USA, pages 6513-6520, 2012.
19. Amnon Ta-Shma and Uri Zwick. Deterministic Rendezvous, Treasure Hunts, and Strongly Universal Exploration Sequences. ACM Trans. Algorithms, 10(3):12:1-12:15, 2014.