On the Complexity of the Eigenvalue Deletion Problem

Authors Neeldhara Misra , Harshil Mittal, Saket Saurabh , Dhara Thakkar



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.ISAAC.2023.53.pdf
  • Filesize: 1.2 MB
  • 17 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Neeldhara Misra
  • Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, India
Harshil Mittal
  • Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, India
Saket Saurabh
  • Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, India
  • University of Bergen, Norway
Dhara Thakkar
  • Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, India

Acknowledgements

We thank Daniel Lokshtanov for helpful discussions.

Cite AsGet BibTex

Neeldhara Misra, Harshil Mittal, Saket Saurabh, and Dhara Thakkar. On the Complexity of the Eigenvalue Deletion Problem. In 34th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 283, pp. 53:1-53:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2023.53

Abstract

For any fixed positive integer r and a given budget k, the r-Eigenvalue Vertex Deletion (r-EVD) problem asks if a graph G admits a subset S of at most k vertices such that the adjacency matrix of G⧵S has at most r distinct eigenvalues. The edge deletion, edge addition, and edge editing variants are defined analogously. For r = 1, r-EVD is equivalent to the Vertex Cover problem. For r = 2, it turns out that r-EVD amounts to removing a subset S of at most k vertices so that G⧵ S is a cluster graph where all connected components have the same size. We show that r-EVD is NP-complete even on bipartite graphs with maximum degree four for every fixed r > 2, and FPT when parameterized by the solution size and the maximum degree of the graph. We also establish several results for the special case when r = 2. For the vertex deletion variant, we show that 2-EVD is NP-complete even on triangle-free and 3d-regular graphs for any d ≥ 2, and also NP-complete on d-regular graphs for any d ≥ 8. The edge deletion, addition, and editing variants are all NP-complete for r = 2. The edge deletion problem admits a polynomial time algorithm if the input is a cluster graph, while - in contrast - the edge addition variant is hard even when the input is a cluster graph. We show that the edge addition variant has a quadratic kernel. The edge deletion and vertex deletion variants admit a single-exponential FPT algorithm when parameterized by the solution size alone. Our main contribution is to develop the complexity landscape for the problem of modifying a graph with the aim of reducing the number of distinct eigenvalues in the spectrum of its adjacency matrix. It turns out that this captures, apart from Vertex Cover, also a natural variation of the problem of modifying to a cluster graph as a special case, which we believe may be of independent interest.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Design and analysis of algorithms
Keywords
  • Graph Modification
  • Rank Reduction
  • Eigenvalues

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Helmut Alt, Norbert Blum, Kurt Mehlhorn, and Markus Paul. Computing a maximum cardinality matching in a bipartite graph in time o (n1. 5mlog n). Information Processing Letters, 37(4):237-240, 1991. Google Scholar
  2. Andries E Brouwer and Willem H Haemers. Spectra of graphs. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011. Google Scholar
  3. Dibyayan Chakraborty, L Sunil Chandran, Sajith Padinhatteeri, and Raji R Pillai. Algorithms and complexity of s-club cluster vertex deletion. In Combinatorial Algorithms: 32nd International Workshop, IWOCA 2021, pages 152-164. Springer, 2021. Google Scholar
  4. Ante Ćustić, Bettina Klinz, and Gerhard J Woeginger. Geometric versions of the three-dimensional assignment problem under general norms. Discrete Optimization, 18:38-55, 2015. Google Scholar
  5. Michael Doob. On characterizing certain graphs with four eigenvalues by their spectra. Linear Algebra and its applications, 3(4):461-482, 1970. Google Scholar
  6. Jack Edmonds. Paths, trees, and flowers. Canadian Journal of mathematics, 17:449-467, 1965. Google Scholar
  7. Michael R Garey and David S Johnson. Computers and intractability, volume 174. freeman San Francisco, 1979. Google Scholar
  8. Felix Goldberg, Steve Kirkland, Anu Varghese, and Ambat Vijayakumar. On split graphs with four distinct eigenvalues. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 277:163-171, 2020. Google Scholar
  9. S.M. Meesum, Pranabendu Misra, and Saket Saurabh. Reducing rank of the adjacency matrix by graph modification. Theoretical Computer Science, 654:70-79, 2016. Google Scholar
  10. Syed M. Meesum and Saket Saurabh. Rank reduction of oriented graphs by vertex and edge deletions. Algorithmica, 80(10):2757-2776, 2018. Google Scholar
  11. Assaf Natanzon. Complexity and approximation of some graph modification problems. University of Tel-Aviv, 1999. Google Scholar
  12. Ron Shamir, Roded Sharan, and Dekel Tsur. Cluster graph modification problems. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 144(1-2):173-182, 2004. Google Scholar
  13. Michele Zito. Linear time maximum induced matching algorithm for trees. Nord. J. Comput., 7(1):58, 2000. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail