Self-awareness holds the promise of better decision making based on a comprehensive assessment of a system’s own situation. Therefore it has been studied for more than ten years in a range of settings and applications. However, in the literature the term has been used in a variety of meanings and today there is no consensus on what features and properties it should include. In fact, researchers disagree on the relative benefits of a self-aware system compared to one that is very similar but lacks self-awareness. We sketch a formal model, and thus a formal definition, of self-awareness. The model is based on dynamic dataflow semantics and includes self-assessment, a simulation and an abstraction as facilitating techniques, which are modeled by spawning new dataflow actors in the system. Most importantly, it has a method to focus on any of its parts to make it a subject of analysis by applying abstraction, self-assessment and simulation. In particular, it can apply this process to itself, which we call recursive self-reflection. There is no arbitrary limit to this self-scrutiny except resource constraints.
@InProceedings{jantsch:OASIcs.ASD.2019.6, author = {Jantsch, Axel}, title = {{Towards a Formal Model of Recursive Self-Reflection}}, booktitle = {Workshop on Autonomous Systems Design (ASD 2019)}, pages = {6:1--6:15}, series = {Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)}, ISBN = {978-3-95977-102-3}, ISSN = {2190-6807}, year = {2019}, volume = {68}, editor = {Saidi, Selma and Ernst, Rolf and Ziegenbein, Dirk}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik}, address = {Dagstuhl, Germany}, URL = {https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.ASD.2019.6}, URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-103395}, doi = {10.4230/OASIcs.ASD.2019.6}, annote = {Keywords: Cyber-physical systems, self-aware systems, self-reflection, self-assessment} }
Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing