Search Results

Documents authored by Bracevac, Oliver

Document
Artifact
DOI: 10.4230/DARTS.8.2.26
What If We Don't Pop the Stack? The Return of 2nd-Class Values (Artifact)

Authors: Anxhelo Xhebraj, Oliver Bračevac, Guannan Wei, and Tiark Rompf

Published in: DARTS, Volume 8, Issue 2, Special Issue of the 36th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2022)

Abstract
The main paper presents λ^{1/2}_{↩}, a type system and operational semantics with 2nd-class values and delayed stack reclamation. This artifact contains a compiler implementation of the calculus in Scala Native, the code for the case studies shown in the paper, and code for reproducing the evaluation.
Cite as

Anxhelo Xhebraj, Oliver Bračevac, Guannan Wei, and Tiark Rompf. What If We Don't Pop the Stack? The Return of 2nd-Class Values (Artifact). In Special Issue of the 36th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2022). Dagstuhl Artifacts Series (DARTS), Volume 8, Issue 2, pp. 26:1-26:2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{xhebraj_et_al:DARTS.8.2.26,
  author =	{Xhebraj, Anxhelo and Bra\v{c}evac, Oliver and Wei, Guannan and Rompf, Tiark},
  title =	{{What If We Don't Pop the Stack? The Return of 2nd-Class Values (Artifact)}},
  pages =	{26:1--26:2},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Artifacts Series},
  ISSN =	{2509-8195},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{8},
  number =	{2},
  editor =	{Xhebraj, Anxhelo and Bra\v{c}evac, Oliver and Wei, Guannan and Rompf, Tiark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DARTS.8.2.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-162247},
  doi =		{10.4230/DARTS.8.2.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: Call stack, closures, stack allocation, memory management, 2nd-class values, capabilities, effects}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2022.15
What If We Don't Pop the Stack? The Return of 2nd-Class Values

Authors: Anxhelo Xhebraj, Oliver Bračevac, Guannan Wei, and Tiark Rompf

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 222, 36th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2022)

Abstract
Using a stack for managing the local state of procedures as popularized by Algol is a simple but effective way to achieve a primitive form of automatic memory management. Hence, the call stack remains the backbone of most programming language runtimes to the present day. However, the appealing simplicity of the call stack model comes at the price of strictly enforced limitations: since every function return pops the stack, it is difficult to return stack-allocated data from a callee upwards to its caller - especially variable-size data such as closures. This paper proposes a solution by introducing a small tweak to the usual stack semantics. We design a type system that tracks the underlying storage mode of values, and when a function returns a stack-allocated value, we just don't pop the stack! Instead, the stack frame is de-allocated together with a parent the next time a heap-allocated value or primitive is returned. We identify a range of use cases where this delayed-popping strategy is beneficial, ranging from closures to trait objects to other types of variable-size data. Our evaluation shows that this execution model reduces heap and GC pressure and recovers spatial locality of programs improving execution time between 10% and 25% with respect to standard execution.
Cite as

Anxhelo Xhebraj, Oliver Bračevac, Guannan Wei, and Tiark Rompf. What If We Don't Pop the Stack? The Return of 2nd-Class Values. In 36th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 222, pp. 15:1-15:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{xhebraj_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2022.15,
  author =	{Xhebraj, Anxhelo and Bra\v{c}evac, Oliver and Wei, Guannan and Rompf, Tiark},
  title =	{{What If We Don't Pop the Stack? The Return of 2nd-Class Values}},
  booktitle =	{36th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2022)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-225-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{222},
  editor =	{Ali, Karim and Vitek, Jan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2022.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-162430},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2022.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: Call stack, closures, stack allocation, memory management, 2nd-class values, capabilities, effects}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.18
A Co-contextual Type Checker for Featherweight Java

Authors: Edlira Kuci, Sebastian Erdweg, Oliver Bracevac, Andi Bejleri, and Mira Mezini

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 74, 31st European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2017)

Abstract
This paper addresses compositional and incremental type checking for object-oriented programming languages. Recent work achieved incremental type checking for structurally typed functional languages through co-contextual typing rules, a constraint-based formulation that removes any context dependency for expression typings. However, that work does not cover key features of object-oriented languages: Subtype polymorphism, nominal typing, and implementation inheritance. Type checkers encode these features in the form of class tables, an additional form of typing context inhibiting incrementalization. In the present work, we demonstrate that an appropriate co-contextual notion to class tables exists, paving the way to efficient incremental type checkers for object-oriented languages. This yields a novel formulation of Igarashi et al.'s Featherweight Java (FJ) type system, where we replace class tables by the dual concept of class table requirements and class table operations by dual operations on class table requirements. We prove the equivalence of FJ's type system and our co-contextual formulation. Based on our formulation, we implemented an incremental FJ type checker and compared its performance against javac on a number of realistic example programs.
Cite as

Edlira Kuci, Sebastian Erdweg, Oliver Bracevac, Andi Bejleri, and Mira Mezini. A Co-contextual Type Checker for Featherweight Java. In 31st European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 74, pp. 18:1-18:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kuci_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.18,
  author =	{Kuci, Edlira and Erdweg, Sebastian and Bracevac, Oliver and Bejleri, Andi and Mezini, Mira},
  title =	{{A Co-contextual Type Checker for Featherweight Java}},
  booktitle =	{31st European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2017)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-035-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{74},
  editor =	{M\"{u}ller, Peter},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-72628},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: type checking, co-contextual, constraints, class table, Featherweight Java}
}
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact