License
When quoting this document, please refer to the following
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-27318
URL: http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2011/2731/
Go to the corresponding Portal

Forbus, Kenneth D.

How should depiction be represented and reasoned about?

pdf-format:
Document 1.pdf (166 KB)

Abstract

Interpreting a scene requires understanding how its visual properties and context yield evidence about the spatial and conceptual properties of what it depicts. Depiction is intimately tied to spatial language, since describing a scene linguistically, or imagining a scene described in language, involves connecting linguistic and spatial knowledge. We focus here on scenes described via sketching.

BibTeX - Entry

@InProceedings{forbus:DSP:2011:2731,
  author =	{Kenneth D. Forbus},
  title =	{{How should depiction be represented and reasoned about{\u n}}},
  booktitle =	{Spatial Representation and Reasoning in Language : Ontologies and Logics of Space},
  year =	{2011},
  editor =	{John A. Bateman and Anthony G. Cohn and James Pustejovsky},
  number =	{10131},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Germany},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2011/2731},
  annote =	{Keywords: Sketch understanding, analogy, spatial language, spatial reasoning}
}

Keywords: Sketch understanding, analogy, spatial language, spatial reasoning
Seminar: 10131 - Spatial Representation and Reasoning in Language : Ontologies and Logics of Space
Issue Date: 2011
Date of publication: 04.01.2011

DROPS-Home | Fulltext Search | Imprint Published by LZI