Evaluating ontology alignment methods

Euzenat, Jerome

doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.04391.5

Document

Evaluating ontology alignment methods

Author Jerome Euzenat

Part of: Volume: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 4391
Part of: Series: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license
Publication Date: 2005-03-23

PDF

File

PDF

DagSemProc.04391.5.pdf

Filesize: 157 kB
8 pages

Document Identifiers

DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.04391.5
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-360

Subject Classification

Keywords

evaluation
ontology alignment

Metrics

Access Statistics
Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)

0

PDF Downloads

0

Metadata Views

Abstract

Many different methods have been designed for aligning ontologies.
These methods use such different techniques that they can hardly be
compared theoretically. Hence, it is necessary to compare them on
common tests.
We present two initiatives that led to the definition and the performance of the
evaluation of ontology alignments during 2004.
We draw lessons from these two experiments and discuss future improvements.

Cite As Get BibTex

Jerome Euzenat. Evaluating ontology alignment methods. In Semantic Interoperability and Integration. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 4391, pp. 1-8, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2005) https://doi.org/10.4230/DagSemProc.04391.5

Author Details

Jerome Euzenat

Any Issues?

Feedback on the Current Page

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail