License
when quoting this document, please refer to the following
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-360
URL: http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2005/36/

Euzenat, Jerome
Standards and Benchmarks

Evaluating ontology alignment methods

pdf-format:
Dokument 1.pdf (158 KB)


Abstract

Many different methods have been designed for aligning ontologies. These methods use such different techniques that they can hardly be compared theoretically. Hence, it is necessary to compare them on common tests. We present two initiatives that led to the definition and the performance of the evaluation of ontology alignments during 2004. We draw lessons from these two experiments and discuss future improvements.

BibTeX - Entry

@InProceedings{euzenat:DSP:2005:36,
  author =	{Jerome Euzenat},
  title =	{Evaluating ontology alignment methods},
  booktitle =	{Semantic Interoperability and Integration},
  year =	{2005},
  editor =	{Y. Kalfoglou and M. Schorlemmer and A. Sheth and S. Staab and M. Uschold},
  number =	{04391},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  publisher =	{Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum f{\"u}r Informatik (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2005/36},
  annote =	{Keywords: evaluation , ontology alignment}
}

Keywords: evaluation , ontology alignment
Seminar: 04391 - Semantic Interoperability and Integration
Issue date: 2005
Date of publication: 23.03.2005


DROPS-Home | Fulltext Search | Imprint Published by LZI