Approximate comparison of distance automata

Authors Thomas Colcombet, Laure Daviaud



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.STACS.2013.574.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.6 MB
  • 12 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Thomas Colcombet
Laure Daviaud

Cite As Get BibTex

Thomas Colcombet and Laure Daviaud. Approximate comparison of distance automata. In 30th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2013). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 20, pp. 574-585, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2013) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2013.574

Abstract

Distance automata are automata weighted over the semiring (\mathbb{N} \cup \infty,\min,+) (the tropical semiring). Such automata compute functions from words to \mathbb{N} \cup \infty such as the number of occurrences of a given letter. It is known that testing f <= g is an undecidable problem for f,g computed by distance automata. The main contribution of this paper is to show that an approximation of this problem becomes decidable.

We present an algorithm which, given epsilon > 0 and two functions f,g computed by distance automata, answers "yes" if f <= (1-epsilon) g, "no" if $f \not\leq g$, and may answer "yes" or "no" in all other cases. This result highly refines previously known decidability results of the same type.

The core argument behind this quasi-decision procedure is an algorithm which is able to provide an approximated finite presentation to the closure under products of sets of matrices over the tropical semiring.

We also provide another theorem, of affine domination, which shows that previously known decision procedures for cost-automata have an improved precision when used over distance automata.

Subject Classification

Keywords
  • Distance automata
  • tropical semiring
  • decidability
  • cost functions

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail