Counting Ascents in Generalized Dyck Paths

Authors Benjamin Hackl , Clemens Heuberger , Helmut Prodinger



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.AofA.2018.26.pdf
  • Filesize: 442 kB
  • 15 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Benjamin Hackl
  • Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Austria
Clemens Heuberger
  • Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Austria
Helmut Prodinger
  • Department of Mathematical Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa

Cite As Get BibTex

Benjamin Hackl, Clemens Heuberger, and Helmut Prodinger. Counting Ascents in Generalized Dyck Paths. In 29th International Conference on Probabilistic, Combinatorial and Asymptotic Methods for the Analysis of Algorithms (AofA 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 110, pp. 26:1-26:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.AofA.2018.26

Abstract

Non-negative Lukasiewicz paths are special two-dimensional lattice paths never passing below their starting altitude which have only one single special type of down step. They are well-known and -studied combinatorial objects, in particular due to their bijective relation to trees with given node degrees.
We study the asymptotic behavior of the number of ascents (i.e., the number of maximal sequences of consecutive up steps) of given length for classical subfamilies of general non-negative Lukasiewicz paths: those with arbitrary ending altitude, those ending on their starting altitude, and a variation thereof. Our results include precise asymptotic expansions for the expected number of such ascents as well as for the corresponding variance.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Mathematics of computing → Generating functions
  • Mathematics of computing → Enumeration
  • Theory of computation → Random walks and Markov chains
  • Mathematics of computing → Mathematical software
Keywords
  • Lattice path
  • Lukasiewicz path
  • ascent
  • asymptotic analysis
  • implicit function
  • singular inversion

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Cyril Banderier and Philippe Flajolet. Basic analytic combinatorics of directed lattice paths. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 281(1-2):37-80, 2002. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3975(02)00007-5.
  2. David Bevan. Permutations avoiding 1324 and patterns in Łukasiewicz paths. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2), 92(1):105-122, 2015. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/jlms/jdv020.
  3. Philippe Flajolet and Robert Sedgewick. Analytic combinatorics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801655.
  4. Ronald L. Graham, Donald E. Knuth, and Oren Patashnik. Concrete mathematics. A foundation for computer science. Addison-Wesley, second edition, 1994. Google Scholar
  5. Benjamin Hackl, Clemens Heuberger, and Helmut Prodinger. Ascents in non-negative lattice paths. arXiv:1801.02996 [math.CO], 2018. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.02996.
  6. Kairi Kangro, Mozhgan Pourmoradnasseri, and Dirk Oliver Theis. Short note on the number of 1-ascents in dispersed Dyck paths. arXiv:1603.01422 [math.CO], 2016. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01422.
  7. M. Lothaire. Combinatorics on words. Cambridge Mathematical Library. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997. With a foreword by Roger Lyndon and a preface by Dominique Perrin, Corrected reprint of the 1983 original, with a new preface by Perrin. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511566097.
  8. Amram Meir and John W. Moon. On an asymptotic method in enumeration. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 51(1):77-89, 1989. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0097-3165(89)90078-2.
  9. Helmut Prodinger. Returns, hills, and t-ary trees. J. Integer Seq., 19(7):Article 16.7.2, 8, 2016. URL: https://www.emis.de/journals/JIS/VOL19/Prodinger/prod41.html.
  10. The SageMath Developers. SageMath Mathematics Software (Version 8.1), 2017. URL: http://www.sagemath.org.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail