,
Bingkai Lin
,
Xin Zheng
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license
We present a simple deterministic reduction which, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), yields tight lower bounds for approximating the parameterized Maximum Likelihood Decoding problem (MLD) and the parameterized Nearest Codeword Problem (NCP) within some fixed constant factor. Our starting point is the ETH-based exponential-time hardness of (c, s)-Gap MAXLIN established in [Nir Bitansky et al., 2024]. We transform a (c, s)-Gap MAXLIN instance into an instance of γ-Gap k-MLD via a novel combinatorial object that we call a cover family. We provide both a randomized construction of the required cover families and a subsequent derandomization. Prior to our work, n^{Ω(k)} hardness for constant-factor approximation was only shown under the randomized Gap Exponential Time Hypothesis Gap-ETH [Pasin Manurangsi, 2020], which is a much stronger assumption than ETH. Under ETH, the strongest known lower bound was n^{Ω(k/poly log k)} due to [Mitali Bafna et al., 2025]. Unlike previous approaches that rely on reductions from the hardness of approximating 2-CSP, our reduction provides a more direct and conceptually simpler route to achieving the optimal lower bounds.
@InProceedings{gupta_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2026.1,
author = {Gupta, Rishav and Lin, Bingkai and Zheng, Xin},
title = {{Tight Lower Bound for Approximating Parametrized Maximum Likelihood Decoding Under ETH}},
booktitle = {41st Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2026)},
pages = {1:1--1:17},
series = {Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
ISBN = {978-3-95977-437-6},
ISSN = {1868-8969},
year = {2026},
volume = {383},
editor = {Moshkovitz, Dana},
publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
address = {Dagstuhl, Germany},
URL = {https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2026.1},
URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-270439},
doi = {10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2026.1},
annote = {Keywords: Maximum Likelihood Decoding, Parameterized Complexity, Hardness of Approximation, Exponential Time Hypothesis}
}