Document Open Access Logo

Decomposing Permutation Automata

Authors Ismaël Jecker, Nicolas Mazzocchi, Petra Wolf



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.CONCUR.2021.18.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.95 MB
  • 19 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Ismaël Jecker
  • Institute of Science and Technology, Klosterneuburg, Austria
Nicolas Mazzocchi
  • IMDEA Software Institute, Madrid, Spain
Petra Wolf
  • Fachbereich IV, Informatikwissenschaften, Universität Trier, Germany

Cite AsGet BibTex

Ismaël Jecker, Nicolas Mazzocchi, and Petra Wolf. Decomposing Permutation Automata. In 32nd International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 203, pp. 18:1-18:19, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2021.18

Abstract

A deterministic finite automaton (DFA) 𝒜 is composite if its language L(𝒜) can be decomposed into an intersection ⋂_{i = 1}^k L(𝒜_i) of languages of smaller DFAs. Otherwise, 𝒜 is prime. This notion of primality was introduced by Kupferman and Mosheiff in 2013, and while they proved that we can decide whether a DFA is composite, the precise complexity of this problem is still open, with a doubly-exponential gap between the upper and lower bounds. In this work, we focus on permutation DFAs, i.e., those for which the transition monoid is a group. We provide an NP algorithm to decide whether a permutation DFA is composite, and show that the difficulty of this problem comes from the number of non-accepting states of the instance: we give a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm with the number of rejecting states as the parameter. Moreover, we investigate the class of commutative permutation DFAs. Their structural properties allow us to decide compositionality in NL, and even in LOGSPACE if the alphabet size is fixed. Despite this low complexity, we show that complex behaviors still arise in this class: we provide a family of composite DFAs each requiring polynomially many factors with respect to its size. We also consider the variant of the problem that asks whether a DFA is k-factor composite, that is, decomposable into k smaller DFAs, for some given integer k ∈ ℕ. We show that, for commutative permutation DFAs, restricting the number of factors makes the decision computationally harder, and yields a problem with tight bounds: it is NP-complete. Finally, we show that in general, this problem is in PSPACE, and it is in LOGSPACE for DFAs with a singleton alphabet.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Regular languages
  • Theory of computation → Problems, reductions and completeness
Keywords
  • Deterministic finite automata (DFA)
  • Permutation automata
  • Commutative languages
  • Decomposition
  • Regular Languages
  • Primality

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Christel Baier and Joost-Pieter Katoen. Principles of Model Checking. MIT Press, 2008. Google Scholar
  2. Edmund M. Clarke, David E. Long, and Kenneth L. McMillan. A language for compositional specification and verification of finite state hardware controllers. Proceedings of the IEEE, 79(9):1283-1292, 1991. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/5.97298.
  3. Willem P. de Roever, Hans Langmaack, and Amir Pnueli, editors. Compositionality: The Significant Difference, International Symposium, COMPOS'97, Bad Malente, Germany, September 8-12, 1997. Revised Lectures, volume 1536 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 1998. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49213-5.
  4. Michael R. Garey and David S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman & Co., USA, 1979. Google Scholar
  5. Stephen Gould, Ernest Peltzer, Robert Matthew Barrie, Michael Flanagan, and Darren Williams. Apparatus and method for large hardware finite state machine with embedded equivalence classes, 2007. US Patent 7,180,328. Google Scholar
  6. G. H. Hardy. An introduction to the theory of numbers. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 35(6):778-818, November 1929. URL: https://projecteuclid.org:443/euclid.bams/1183493592.
  7. Ismaël Jecker, Orna Kupferman, and Nicolas Mazzocchi. Unary prime languages. In Javier Esparza and Daniel Král, editors, 45th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, MFCS 2020, August 24-28, 2020, Prague, Czech Republic, volume 170 of LIPIcs, pages 51:1-51:12. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.51.
  8. Michal Kunc and Alexander Okhotin. Reversibility of computations in graph-walking automata. In Krishnendu Chatterjee and Jirí Sgall, editors, Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2013 - 38th International Symposium, MFCS 2013, Klosterneuburg, Austria, August 26-30, 2013. Proceedings, volume 8087 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 595-606. Springer, 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40313-2_53.
  9. Orna Kupferman and Jonathan Mosheiff. Prime languages. Inf. Comput., 240:90-107, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2014.09.010.
  10. Rolf Landauer. Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM J. Res. Dev., 5(3):183-191, 1961. URL: https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.53.0183.
  11. Jaban Meher and M Ram Murty. Ramanujan’s proof of Bertrand’s postulate. The American Mathematical Monthly, 120(7):650-653, 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.4169/amer.math.monthly.120.07.650.
  12. Alon Netser. Decomposition of safe languages. Amirim Research Project report from the Hebrew University, 2018. Google Scholar
  13. Volnei A. Pedroni. Finite State Machines in Hardware: Theory and Design (with VHDL and SystemVerilog). The MIT Press, 2013. Google Scholar
  14. Jean-Eric Pin. On reversible automata. In Imre Simon, editor, LATIN '92, 1st Latin American Symposium on Theoretical Informatics, São Paulo, Brazil, April 6-10, 1992, Proceedings, volume 583 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 401-416. Springer, 1992. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0023844.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail