Document Open Access Logo

The Role of Gaze and the Semantics of Demonstratives in Referent Selection (Short Paper)

Authors Crystal H. Y. Chen, Lyn Tieu, Ana T. Pérez-Leroux

PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.COSIT.2024.20.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.61 MB
  • 8 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Crystal H. Y. Chen
  • University of Toronto, Canada
Lyn Tieu
  • University of Toronto, Canada
  • MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
  • Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
Ana T. Pérez-Leroux
  • University of Toronto, Canada

Funding

  • Chen, Crystal H. Y.: Vanier CGS.
  • Tieu, Lyn: SSHRC Insight Development Grant.
  • Pérez-Leroux, Ana T.: Department of Spanish and Portuguese (University of Toronto).

Cite As Get BibTex

Crystal H. Y. Chen, Lyn Tieu, and Ana T. Pérez-Leroux. The Role of Gaze and the Semantics of Demonstratives in Referent Selection (Short Paper). In 16th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 315, pp. 20:1-20:8, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.COSIT.2024.20

Abstract

Demonstratives (this/that) situate objects in space with the aid of gestures and a proximal-distal contrast. However, it is unclear how these cues interact to aid the listener in referent selection. The current paper presents a referent selection task where listeners choose an object out of a group of objects based on a physical and verbal cue provided by a speaker. Results indicate that listeners are sensitive to a variety of cues, but only integrate the minimum amount of information necessary for referent selection, with physical cues being prioritized over the semantic contributions of the demonstrative.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Semantics and reasoning
Keywords
  • Demonstratives
  • spatial language
  • proximal-distal contrast
  • referent distance
  • joint attention coordination
  • gesture
  • deixis
  • referent selection
  • experimental semantics

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
    0
    Metadata Views

References

  1. Derek A. Albert and Daniel Smilek. Comparing attentional disengagement between prolific and mturk samples. Scientific Reports, 13(1):20574, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46048-5.
  2. Douglas Bates, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1):1-48, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
  3. Craig Chambers. The role of affordances in visually situated language comprehension. Visually situated language comprehension, 12:205-226, 2016. Google Scholar
  4. Craig G. Chambers, Michael K. Tanenhaus, and James S. Magnuson. Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 30(3):687-696, 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.687.
  5. Eve V. Clark. From gesture to word: On the natural history of deixis in language acquisition. Human growth and development, pages 1-38, 1976. Google Scholar
  6. Eve V. Clark and CJ Sengul. Strategies in the acquisition of deixis. Journal of child language, 5(3):457-475, 1978. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900002099.
  7. Kenny R. Coventry, Bernice Valdés, Alejandro Castillo, and Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes. Language within your reach: Near-far perceptual space and spatial demonstratives. Cognition, 108(3):889-895, 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.010.
  8. Holger Diessel. Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization, typological studies. Language, 42, 1999. Google Scholar
  9. Holger Diessel. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(4):463-489, 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.015.
  10. Holger Diessel. Demonstratives, frames of reference, and semantic universals of space. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(3):116-132, 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12066.
  11. Robert M.W. Dixon. Demonstratives: A cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”, 27(1):61-112, 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.1.04dix.
  12. Benjamin D. Douglas, Patrick J. Ewell, and Markus Brauer. Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between mturk, prolific, cloudresearch, qualtrics, and sona. Plos one, 18(3):e0279720, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279720.
  13. Nick J. Enfield. Demonstratives in space and interaction: Data from lao speakers and implications for semantic analysis. Language, 79(1):82-117, 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0075.
  14. Mats Eriksson. Referring as interaction: On the interplay between linguistic and bodily practices. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(2):240-262, 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.011.
  15. Sonja Gipper. Pre-semantic pragmatics encoded: a non-spatial account of yurakaré demonstratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 120:122-143, 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.08.012.
  16. John Hindmarsh and Christian Heath. Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of pragmatics, 32(12):1855-1878, 2000. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00122-8.
  17. Stephen C. Levinson. Deixis and pragmatic. The Handbook of Pragmatics, pages 97-121, 2004. Google Scholar
  18. Stephen C. Levinson. Introduction: demonstratives: patterns in diversity. In Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective, pages 1-42. Cambridge University Press, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.20759/elsjp.98.0_168.
  19. Eyal Peer, David Rothschild, Andrew Gordon, Zak Evernden, and Ekaterina Damer. Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behavior research methods, 54(4):1643-1662, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01694-3.
  20. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2023. URL: https://www.R-project.org/.
  21. Craige Roberts. Demonstratives as definites. Information sharing: Reference and presupposition in language generation and interpretation, pages 89-196, 2002. Google Scholar
  22. Anja Stukenbrock. Deixis in der face-to-face-Interaktion, volume 47. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2015. Google Scholar
  23. Leonard Talmy. The targeting system of language. MIT Press, 2018. Google Scholar
  24. Roger Wales. Deixis. Language acquisition, 2:401-428, 1986. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact