Document Open Access Logo

Consistent Digital Curved Rays and Pseudoline Arrangements

Authors Jinhee Chun, Kenya Kikuchi, Takeshi Tokuyama



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.ESA.2019.32.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.8 MB
  • 16 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Jinhee Chun
  • GSIS Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
Kenya Kikuchi
  • GSIS Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
Takeshi Tokuyama
  • Kwansei-Gakuin University, Sanda, Hyōgo, Japan

Cite AsGet BibTex

Jinhee Chun, Kenya Kikuchi, and Takeshi Tokuyama. Consistent Digital Curved Rays and Pseudoline Arrangements. In 27th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 144, pp. 32:1-32:16, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2019.32

Abstract

Representing a family of geometric objects in the digital world where each object is represented by a set of pixels is a basic problem in graphics and computational geometry. One important criterion is the consistency, where the intersection pattern of the objects should be consistent with axioms of the Euclidean geometry, e.g., the intersection of two lines should be a single connected component. Previously, the set of linear rays and segments has been considered. In this paper, we extended this theory to families of curved rays going through the origin. We further consider some psudoline arrangements obtained as unions of such families of rays.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Computational geometry
Keywords
  • Computational Geometry
  • Digital Geometry
  • Spanning Tree
  • Graph Drawing

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. M. Chiu, M. Korman, M. Sutherland, and T. Tokuyama. Distance bounds for 3-D consistent digital rays and 2-D partially-consistent digital rays. In preparation. Google Scholar
  2. I. Chowdhury and M Gibson. A Characterization of Consistent Digital Line Segments in Z². In Proc. 23rd ESA, pages 337-348, 2015. Google Scholar
  3. I. Chowdhury and M Gibson. Constructing Consistent Digital Line Segments. In Proc. 12th LATIN, pages 263-274, 2016. Google Scholar
  4. T. Christ, D. Pálvölgyi, and M. Stojaković. Consistent Digital Line Segment. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 47-4:691-710, 2012. Google Scholar
  5. J. Chun, M. Korman, M. Nöllenburg, and T. Tokuyama. Consistent Digital Rays. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 42-3:359-378, 2009. Google Scholar
  6. F.P.Preparata and M.I.Shamos. Computational Geometry - an Introduction. Springer Verlag, 1985. Google Scholar
  7. D. Greene and F. Yao. Finite Resolutional Computational Geometry. In Proc. 27th IEEE FOCS, pages 143-152, 1986. Google Scholar
  8. D. Halperin and E. Packer. Iterated Snap Rounding. Comput. Geom. Theor. Appl., 23:209-225, 2002. Google Scholar
  9. J. Hershberger. Stable Snap Rounding. Comput. Geom. Theor. Appl., 46:403-416, 2013. Google Scholar
  10. J. Hobby. Practical Segment Intersection with Finite Precision Output. Comput. Geom. Theor. Appl., 13:199-214, 1999. Google Scholar
  11. R. Klette and A. Rosenfeld. Digital straightness - a review. Discrete Applied Math., 139:197-230, 2004. Google Scholar
  12. J. Matousěk. Geometric Discrepancy. Springer Verlag, 1991. Google Scholar
  13. K. Mehlhorn and S. Näher. LEDA: a platform for combinatorial and geometric computation. Cambridge University Press, 1999. Google Scholar
  14. M.G.Lubby. Grid geometries which preserve properties of Euclidean geometry: A study of graphics line drawing algorithms. In NATO Conference on Graphics/CAD, pages 397-432, 1987. Google Scholar
  15. V. Milenkovic. Double Precision Geometry: A General Technique for Calculating Lines and Segment Intersections using Rounding Arithmetic. In Proc. 30th IEEE FOCS, pages 500-505, 1989. Google Scholar
  16. H. Niederreiter. Recent constructions of low-discrepancy sequences. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 135:18-27, 2017. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail