Network Planning and Routing Problems over Time: Models, Complexity and Algorithms (Invited Talk)

Authors Lukas Glomb, Benno Hoch, Frauke Liers, Florian Rösel



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.ESA.2021.1.pdf
  • Filesize: 367 kB
  • 3 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Lukas Glomb
  • Department of Data Science, Department Mathematik, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
Benno Hoch
  • Department of Data Science, Department Mathematik, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
Frauke Liers
  • Department of Data Science, Department Mathematik, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
Florian Rösel
  • Department of Data Science, Department Mathematik, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany

Cite AsGet BibTex

Lukas Glomb, Benno Hoch, Frauke Liers, and Florian Rösel. Network Planning and Routing Problems over Time: Models, Complexity and Algorithms (Invited Talk). In 29th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 204, pp. 1:1-1:3, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2021.1

Abstract

In this invited contribution for ESA 2021, we will study the complexity of and algorithms for network optimization tasks with a timing component. They occur, for example, in planning or routing problems that need to be solved repeatedly over time. Typically, already simplified versions of such problems are NP-hard. In addition, the instances typically are too large to be solved straight-forwardly on a time-expanded graph. After an introduction into the area, we state the problem of determining best possible non-stop trajectories in a network that are not allowed to cross at any point in time. For simplified settings, polynomial-time solution approaches are presented whereas already for restricted settings the problems are shown to be NP-hard. When moving to more complex and more realistic settings as they occur, for example, in determining non-stop disjoint trajectories for a set of aircraft, we present heuristic algorithms that adaptively refine coarse disjoint trajectories in the timing dimension. In order to be able to solve the non-stop disjoint trajectories problem over time, the method is integrated in a rolling-horizon algorithm. We present computational results for realistic settings. Motivated by the fact that rolling-horizon approaches are often applied in practice without knowledge on the quality of the obtained solutions, we study this problem from an abstract point of view. In fact, we more abstractly analyze the solution quality of general rolling-horizon algorithms for optimization tasks that show a timing component. We apply it to different planning problems. We end by pointing out some challenges and possibilities for future research.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation
  • Mathematics of computing → Discrete mathematics
Keywords
  • network problems over time
  • rolling-horizon
  • complexity
  • approximation

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Bernardetta Addis, Giuliana Carello, Andrea Grosso, and Elena Tànfani. Operating room scheduling and rescheduling: a rolling horizon approach. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 28(1-2):206-232, 2016. Google Scholar
  2. James C Bean and Robert L Smith. Conditions for the existence of planning horizons. Mathematics of Operations Research, 9(3):391-401, 1984. Google Scholar
  3. Lukas Glomb, Frauke Liers, and Florian Rösel. A rolling-horizon approach for multi-period optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.07.043.
  4. Benedikt Grüter, Matthias Bittner, Matthias Rieck, Johannes Diepolder, and Florian Holzapfel. Optimal sequencing in atm combining genetic algorithms and gradient based methods to a bilevel approach. In ICAS 30th International Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, 2016. Google Scholar
  5. Benno Hoch, Frauke Liers, Sarah Neumann, and Francisco Javier Zaragoza Martınez. The non-stop disjoint trajectories problem, 2020. Google Scholar
  6. Mohammad Mohammadi, SMT Fatemi Ghomi, Behrooz Karimi, and S Ali Torabi. Rolling-horizon and fix-and-relax heuristics for the multi-product multi-level capacitated lotsizing problem with sequence-dependent setups. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 21(4):501-510, 2010. Google Scholar
  7. Arthur Richards and Jonathan P How. Aircraft trajectory planning with collision avoidance using mixed integer linear programming. In American Control Conference, 2002. Proceedings of the 2002, volume 3, pages 1936-1941. IEEE, 2002. Google Scholar
  8. Johannes Schmidt and Armin Fügenschuh. A two-time-level model for mission and flight planning of an inhomogeneous fleet of unmanned aerial vehicles. Technical report, BTU Cottbus, 2021. Google Scholar
  9. Suresh Sethi and Gerhard Sorger. A theory of rolling horizon decision making. Annals of Operations Research, 29(1):387-415, 1991. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail