Document Open Access Logo

Uncertainty in Causal Neighborhood Effects: A Multi-Agent Simulation Approach (Short Paper)

Author Cécile de Bézenac



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.GIScience.2023.26.pdf
  • Filesize: 1 MB
  • 6 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Cécile de Bézenac
  • University of Leeds, UK
  • The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK

Cite AsGet BibTex

Cécile de Bézenac. Uncertainty in Causal Neighborhood Effects: A Multi-Agent Simulation Approach (Short Paper). In 12th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 277, pp. 26:1-26:6, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.GIScience.2023.26

Abstract

Interaction between individuals within an environment can result in complex patterns that a statistical analysis is unable to disentangle. The resulting social structure may pose important challenges for the identification of causal relations between variables using only observational data. In particular, the estimation of contextual or neighborhood effects will depend on the spatial configuration under study and the morphology of the areas used to define them. The relevant interpretation of estimates is hence put into question. I suggest adopting a Agent Based Modeling (ABM) approach to study the uncertainty of neighborhood effect estimations within complex spatial systems. An Approximate Bayesian Computing algorithm is used to quantify the uncertainty on the underlying processes that may lead to such estimations. An ABM model of spatial segregation is implemented to illustrate this method.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Human-centered computing
Keywords
  • Spatial causal inference
  • neighborhood effects
  • uncertainty
  • Agent Based Modeling
  • Pattern Oriented Modeling

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Steven N Durlauf. Neighborhood effects. Handbook of regional and urban economics, 4:2173-2242, 2004. Google Scholar
  2. Scott Ferson and Kari Sentz. Epistemic uncertainty in agent-based modeling. In 7th international workshop on reliable engineering computing, pages 65-82, 2016. Google Scholar
  3. A Stewart Fotheringham and Mehak Sachdeva. Modelling spatial processes in quantitative human geography. Annals of GIS, 28(1):5-14, 2022. Google Scholar
  4. George C Galster. The mechanism (s) of neighbourhood effects: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. In Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives, pages 23-56. Springer, 2011. Google Scholar
  5. Jackie Kazil, David Masad, and Andrew Crooks. Utilizing python for agent-based modeling: The mesa framework. In Robert Thomson, Halil Bisgin, Christopher Dancy, Ayaz Hyder, and Muhammad Hussain, editors, Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling, pages 308-317, Cham, 2020. Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar
  6. David Manley, Robin Flowerdew, and David Steel. Scales, levels and processes: Studying spatial patterns of british census variables. Computers, environment and urban systems, 30(2):143-160, 2006. Google Scholar
  7. Josie McCulloch, Jiaqi Ge, Jonathan A Ward, Alison Heppenstall, J Gareth Polhill, and Nick Malleson. Calibrating agent-based models using uncertainty quantification methods. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 25(2), 2022. Google Scholar
  8. J Michael Oakes. The (mis) estimation of neighborhood effects: causal inference for a practicable social epidemiology. Social science & medicine, 58(10):1929-1952, 2004. Google Scholar
  9. Francis A Pearman. Gentrification and academic achievement: A review of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 89(1):125-165, 2019. Google Scholar
  10. Brian J Reich, Shu Yang, Yawen Guan, Andrew B Giffin, Matthew J Miller, and Ana Rappold. A review of spatial causal inference methods for environmental and epidemiological applications. International Statistical Review, 89(3):605-634, 2021. Google Scholar
  11. Thomas C Schelling. Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of mathematical sociology, 1(2):143-186, 1971. Google Scholar
  12. Flaminio Squazzoni. The impact of agent-based models in the social sciences after 15 years of incursion. The Impact of Agent-Based Models in the Social Sciences after 15 Years of Incursion, pages 1000-1037, 2010. Google Scholar
  13. Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen and Tyler J VanderWeele. On causal inference in the presence of interference. Statistical methods in medical research, 21(1):55-75, 2012. Google Scholar
  14. Brandon M Turner and Trisha Van Zandt. A tutorial on approximate bayesian computation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(2):69-85, 2012. Google Scholar
  15. Konstantina Valogianni and Balaji Padmanabhan. Causal abms: Learning plausible causal models using agent-based modeling. In The KDD'22 Workshop on Causal Discovery, pages 3-29. PMLR, 2022. Google Scholar
  16. Maarten Van Ham, David Manley, Nick Bailey, Ludi Simpson, and Duncan Maclennan. Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. In Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives, pages 1-21. Springer, 2011. Google Scholar
  17. Blair Wheaton, Rosane Nisenbaum, Richard H Glazier, James R Dunn, Catharine Chambers, et al. The neighbourhood effects on health and well-being (nehw) study. Health & place, 31:65-74, 2015. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail