Document Open Access Logo

Precedence-Constrained Min Sum Set Cover

Authors Jessica McClintock, Julián Mestre, Anthony Wirth

Thumbnail PDF


  • Filesize: 0.51 MB
  • 12 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Jessica McClintock
Julián Mestre
Anthony Wirth

Cite AsGet BibTex

Jessica McClintock, Julián Mestre, and Anthony Wirth. Precedence-Constrained Min Sum Set Cover. In 28th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 92, pp. 55:1-55:12, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)


We introduce a version of the Min Sum Set Cover (MSSC) problem in which there are "AND" precedence constraints on the m sets. In the Precedence-Constrained Min Sum Set Cover (PCMSSC) problem, when interpreted as directed edges, the constraints induce an acyclic directed graph. PCMSSC models the aim of scheduling software tests to prioritize the rate of fault detection subject to dependencies between tests. Our greedy scheme for PCMSSC is similar to the approaches of Feige, Lovasz, and, Tetali for MSSC, and Chekuri and Motwani for precedence-constrained scheduling to minimize weighted completion time. With a factor-4 increase in approximation ratio, we reduce PCMSSC to the problem of finding a maximum-density precedence-closed sub-family of sets, where density is the ratio of sub-family union size to cardinality. We provide a greedy factor-sqrt m algorithm for maximizing density; on forests of in-trees, we show this algorithm finds an optimal solution. Harnessing an alternative greedy argument of Chekuri and Kumar for Maximum Coverage with Group Budget Constraints, on forests of out-trees, we design an algorithm with approximation ratio equal to maximum tree height. Finally, with a reduction from the Planted Dense Subgraph detection problem, we show that its conjectured hardness implies there is no polynomial-time algorithm for PCMSSC with approximation factor in O(m^{1/12-epsilon}).
  • planted dense subgraph
  • min sum set cover
  • precedence constrained


  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    PDF Downloads


  1. Yossi Azar, Iftah Gamzu, and Xiaoxin Yin. Multiple intents re-ranking. In STOC: 41st ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 669-678, 2009. Google Scholar
  2. Nikhil Bansal, Anupam Gupta, and Ravishankar Krishnaswamy. A constant factor approximation algorithm for generalized min-sum set cover. In SODA: 21st ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 1539-1545, 2010. Google Scholar
  3. Glencora Borradaile, Brent Heeringa, and Gordon Wilfong. The knapsack problem with neighbour constraints. Journal of Discrete Algorithms, 16:224-235, 2012. Google Scholar
  4. Jen Burge, Kamesh Munagala, and Utkarsh Srivastava. Ordering pipelined query operators with precedence constraints. Technical Report 2005-40, Stanford InfoLab, 2005. Google Scholar
  5. Moses Charikar, Yonatan Naamad, and Anthony Wirth. On approximating target set selection. In APPROX: 19th International Workshop on Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization Problems, pages 4:1-4:16, 2016. Google Scholar
  6. Chandra Chekuri and Amit Kumar. Maximum coverage problem with group budget constraints and applications. In APPROX: 7th International Workshop on Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization Problems, pages 72-83, 2004. Google Scholar
  7. Chandra Chekuri and Rajeev Motwani. Precedence constrained scheduling to minimize sum of weighted completion times on a single machine. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 98(1):29-38, 1999. Google Scholar
  8. Irit Dinur and Shmuel Safra. On the hardness of approximating label-cover. Information Processing Letters, 89(5):247-254, 2004. Google Scholar
  9. Thomas Erlebach, Vanessa Kääb, and Rolf H Möhring. Scheduling AND/OR-networks on identical parallel machines. In WOAO: International Workshop on Approximation and Online Algorithms, pages 123-136, 2003. Google Scholar
  10. Uriel Feige, László Lovász, and Prasad Tetali. Approximating min sum set cover. Algorithmica, 40(4):219-234, 2004. Google Scholar
  11. Donald W. Gillies and Jane W.-S. Liu. Scheduling tasks with and/or precedence constraints. SIAM Journal on Computing, 24(4):797-810, 1995. Google Scholar
  12. A. V. Goldberg. Finding a maximum density subgraph. Technical Report CSD-84-171, UC Berkeley Computer Science Division, 1984. Google Scholar
  13. Michael Goldwasser and Rajeev Motwani. Intractability of assembly sequencing: Unit disks in the plane. In WADS: Workshop on Algorithms and Data Structures, pages 307-320, 1997. Google Scholar
  14. M Hajiaghayi, Kamal Jain, L Lau, I Măndoiu, Alexander Russell, and V Vazirani. Minimum multicolored subgraph problem in multiplex pcr primer set selection and population haplotyping. Computational Science-ICCS 2006, pages 758-766, 2006. Google Scholar
  15. David S. Johnson and K. A. Niemi. On knapsacks, partitions, and a new dynamic programming technique for trees. Mathematics of Operations Research, 8(1):1-14, 1983. Google Scholar
  16. Stavros G. Kolliopoulos and George Steiner. Partially ordered knapsack and applications to scheduling. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 155(8):889-897, 2007. Google Scholar
  17. Jesssica McClintock, Tim Miller, and Anthony Wirth. Prioritisation of test suites containing precedence constraints, 2017. submitted. Google Scholar
  18. Tim Miller and Shifa-e-Zehra Haidry. Using dependency structures for prioritization of functional test suites. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 39(2):258-275, 2013. Google Scholar
  19. Kamesh Munagala, Shivnath Babu, Rajeev Motwani, and Jennifer Widom. The pipelined set cover problem. In ICDT: 10th International Conference on Database Theory, pages 83-98, 2005. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail