Document Open Access Logo

Concentration Bounds for Quantum States and Limitations on the QAOA from Polynomial Approximations

Authors Anurag Anshu, Tony Metger

Thumbnail PDF


  • Filesize: 0.57 MB
  • 8 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Anurag Anshu
  • School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Tony Metger
  • Institute for Theoretical Studies, ETH Zürich, Switzerland


We thank Joao Basso, David Gamarnik, Song Mei, and Leo Zhou for very helpful discussions and especially for suggesting the application to symmetric QAOA. AA also thanks Daniel Stilck França, Tomotaka Kuwahara, Cambyse Rouzé, and Juspreet Singh Sandhu for helpful discussions. This work was done in part while the authors were visiting the Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing.

Cite AsGet BibTex

Anurag Anshu and Tony Metger. Concentration Bounds for Quantum States and Limitations on the QAOA from Polynomial Approximations. In 14th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 251, pp. 5:1-5:8, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)


We prove concentration bounds for the following classes of quantum states: (i) output states of shallow quantum circuits, answering an open question from [De Palma et al., 2022]; (ii) injective matrix product states; (iii) output states of dense Hamiltonian evolution, i.e. states of the form e^{ιH^{(p)}} ⋯ e^{ιH^{(1)}} |ψ₀⟩ for any n-qubit product state |ψ₀⟩, where each H^{(i)} can be any local commuting Hamiltonian satisfying a norm constraint, including dense Hamiltonians with interactions between any qubits. Our proofs use polynomial approximations to show that these states are close to local operators. This implies that the distribution of the Hamming weight of a computational basis measurement (and of other related observables) concentrates. An example of (iii) are the states produced by the quantum approximate optimisation algorithm (QAOA). Using our concentration results for these states, we show that for a random spin model, the QAOA can only succeed with negligible probability even at super-constant level p = o(log log n), assuming a strengthened version of the so-called overlap gap property. This gives the first limitations on the QAOA on dense instances at super-constant level, improving upon the recent result [Basso et al., 2022].

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Approximation algorithms analysis
  • Theory of computation → Quantum complexity theory
  • Theory of computation → Quantum complexity theory
  • quantum computing
  • polynomial approximation
  • quantum optimization algorithm
  • QAOA
  • overlap gap property


  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    PDF Downloads


  1. Nilin Abrahamsen. Short proof of a spectral chernoff bound for local hamiltonians. arXiv preprint, 2020. URL:
  2. Álvaro M Alhambra. Quantum many-body systems in thermal equilibrium. arXiv preprint, 2022. URL:
  3. Anurag Anshu. Concentration bounds for quantum states with finite correlation length on quantum spin lattice systems. New Journal of Physics, 18(8):083011, August 2016. URL:
  4. Anurag Anshu, Itai Arad, and David Gosset. An area law for 2d frustration-free spin systems. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2022, pages 12-18, New York, NY, USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery. URL:
  5. Anurag Anshu, Nikolas Breuckmann, and Chinmay Nirkhe. NLTS hamiltonians from good quantum codes. arXiv preprint, 2022. URL:
  6. Anurag Anshu and Nikolas P Breuckmann. A construction of combinatorial NLTS. arXiv preprint, 2022. URL:
  7. Anurag Anshu and Chinmay Nirkhe. Circuit Lower Bounds for Low-Energy States of Quantum Code Hamiltonians. In Mark Braverman, editor, 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022), volume 215 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 6:1-6:22, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2022. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. URL:
  8. Joao Basso, David Gamarnik, Song Mei, and Leo Zhou. Performance and limitations of the qaoa at constant levels on large sparse hypergraphs and spin glass models. arXiv preprint, 2022. To appear in FOCS 2022. URL:
  9. Fernando GSL Brandao and Marcus Cramer. Equivalence of statistical mechanical ensembles for non-critical quantum systems. arXiv preprint, 2015. URL:
  10. FGSL Brandao, Marcus Cramer, and Madalin Guta. A berry-esseen theorem for quantum lattice systems and the equivalence of statistical mechanical ensembles. QIP2015 Talk, 2015. URL:
  11. S Bravyi, A Kliesch, R Koenig, and E Tang. Obstacles to state preparation and variational optimization from symmetry protection. arXiv preprint, 2019. URL:
  12. H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, R. De Wolf, and C. Zalka. Bounds for small-error and zero-error quantum algorithms. In Proc. of FOCS 99', pages 358-368, 1999. Google Scholar
  13. Wei-Kuo Chen, David Gamarnik, Dmitry Panchenko, and Mustazee Rahman. Suboptimality of local algorithms for a class of max-cut problems. The Annals of Probability, 47(3):1587-1618, 2019. URL:
  14. Chi-Ning Chou, Peter J. Love, Juspreet Singh Sandhu, and Jonathan Shi. Limitations of Local Quantum Algorithms on Random MAX-k-XOR and Beyond. In 49th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2022), volume 229 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 41:1-41:20, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2022. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik. URL:
  15. Giacomo De Palma, Milad Marvian, Cambyse Rouzé, and Daniel Stilck França. Limitations of variational quantum algorithms: a quantum optimal transport approach. arXiv preprint, 2022. URL:
  16. Giacomo De Palma and Cambyse Rouzé. Quantum concentration inequalities. Annales Henri Poincaré, April 2022. URL:
  17. L. Eldar and A. W. Harrow. Local hamiltonians whose ground states are hard to approximate. In 2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 427-438, 2017. URL:
  18. Edward Farhi, David Gamarnik, and Sam Gutmann. The quantum approximate optimization algorithm needs to see the whole graph: A typical case. arXiv preprint, 2020. URL:
  19. Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, and Sam Gutmann. A quantum approximate optimization algorithm. arXiv preprint, 2014. URL:
  20. David Gamarnik. The overlap gap property: A topological barrier to optimizing over random structures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(41):e2108492118, 2021. Google Scholar
  21. David Gamarnik and Aukosh Jagannath. The overlap gap property and approximate message passing algorithms for p-spin models. The Annals of Probability, 49(1):180-205, 2021. Google Scholar
  22. David Gamarnik and Quan Li. Finding a large submatrix of a gaussian random matrix. The Annals of Statistics, 46(6A):2511-2561, 2018. Google Scholar
  23. D. Goderis and P. Vets. Central limit theorem for mixing quantum systems and the CCR-algebra of fluctuations. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 122:249-265, 1989. Google Scholar
  24. Michael Hartmann, Günter Mahler, and Ortwin Hess. Existence of Temperature on the Nanoscale. Phys. Rev. Lett., 93:080402, August 2004. URL:
  25. M. B. Hastings. Lieb-schultz-mattis in higher dimensions. Phys. Rev. B, 69:104431, March 2004. URL:
  26. Jeff Kahn, Nathan Linial, and Alex Samorodnitsky. Inclusion-exclusion: Exact and approximate. Combinatorica, 16(4):465-477, December 1996. URL:
  27. Tomotaka Kuwahara. Connecting the probability distributions of different operators and generalization of the chernoff-hoeffding inequality. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2016(11):113103, November 2016. URL:
  28. Tomotaka Kuwahara, Itai Arad, Luigi Amico, and Vlatko Vedral. Local reversibility and entanglement structure of many-body ground states. Quantum Science and Technology, 2(1):015005, 2017. Google Scholar
  29. Tomotaka Kuwahara and Keiji Saito. Eigenstate thermalization from the clustering property of correlation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 124:200604, May 2020. URL:
  30. Tomotaka Kuwahara and Keiji Saito. Gaussian concentration bound and ensemble equivalence in generic quantum many-body systems including long-range interactions. Annals of Physics, 421:168278, 2020. URL:
  31. Elliott Lieb, Theodore Schultz, and Daniel Mattis. Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain. Annals of Physics, 16(3):407-466, 1961. URL:
  32. Hal Tasaki. On the local equivalence between the canonical and the microcanonical ensembles for quantum spin systems. Journal of Statistical Physics, 172(4):905-926, August 2018. URL:
Questions / Remarks / Feedback

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail