Document

# Linear High-Order Deterministic Tree Transducers with Regular Look-Ahead

## File

LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.38.pdf
• Filesize: 461 kB
• 13 pages

## Cite As

Paul D. Gallot, Aurélien Lemay, and Sylvain Salvati. Linear High-Order Deterministic Tree Transducers with Regular Look-Ahead. In 45th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 170, pp. 38:1-38:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.38

## Abstract

We introduce the notion of high-order deterministic top-down tree transducers (HODT) whose outputs correspond to single-typed lambda-calculus formulas. These transducers are natural generalizations of known models of top-tree transducers such as: Deterministic Top-Down Tree Transducers, Macro Tree Transducers, Streaming Tree Transducers... We focus on the linear restriction of high order tree transducers with look-ahead (HODTR_lin), and prove this corresponds to tree to tree functional transformations defined by Monadic Second Order (MSO) logic. We give a specialized procedure for the composition of those transducers that uses a flow analysis based on coherence spaces and allows us to preserve the linearity of transducers. This procedure has a better complexity than classical algorithms for composition of other equivalent tree transducers, but raises the order of transducers. However, we also indicate that the order of a HODTR_lin can always be bounded by 3, and give a procedure that reduces the order of a HODTR_lin to 3. As those resulting HODTR_lin can then be transformed into other equivalent models, this gives an important insight on composition algorithm for other classes of transducers. Finally, we prove that those results partially translate to the case of almost linear HODTR: the class corresponds to the class of tree transformations performed by MSO with unfolding (not closed by composition), and provide a mechanism to reduce the order to 3 in this case.

## Subject Classification

##### ACM Subject Classification
• Theory of computation → Transducers
• Theory of computation → Lambda calculus
• Theory of computation → Tree languages
• Transducers
• λ-calculus
• Trees

## Metrics

• Access Statistics
• Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
0

## References

1. R. Alur and L. D'Antoni. Streaming tree transducers. J. ACM, 64(5):31:1-31:55, 2017.
2. Roderick Bloem and Joost Engelfriet. A comparison of tree transductions defined by monadic second order logic and by attribute grammars. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 61(1):1-50, 2000. URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1999.1684.
3. C. Choffrut. A generalization of Ginsburg and Rose’s characterisation of g-s-m mappings. In ICALP 79, number 71 in LNCS, pages 88-103. SV, 1979.
4. H. Comon, M. Dauchet, R. Gilleron, F. Jacquemard, D. Lugiez, C. Löding, S. Tison, and M. Tommasi. Tree Automata Techniques and Applications, 2007. URL: http://tata.gforge.inria.fr/.
5. B. Courcelle. Monadic second-order definable graph transductions: a survey. Theoretical Computer Science, 126(1):53-75, 1994.
6. B. Courcelle. Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformations, Volume 1: Foundations. In Rozenberg, editor, Handbook of Graph Grammars, 1997.
7. S. Eilenberg. Automata, Languages and Machines. Acad. Press, 1974.
8. C. C. Elgot and G. Mezei. On relations defined by generalized finite automata. IBM J. of Res. and Dev., 9:88-101, 1965.
9. J. Engelfriet and S. Maneth. Macro tree transducers, attribute grammars, and mso definable tree translations. Information and Computation, 154(1):34-91, 1999.
10. J. Engelfriet and S. Maneth. The equivalence problem for deterministic MSO tree transducers is decidable. Inf. Process. Lett., 100(5):206-212, 2006.
11. J. Engelfriet and H. Vogler. Macro tree transducers. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 31(1):71-146, 1985.
12. Joost Engelfriet and Heiko Vogler. High level tree transducers and iterated pushdown tree transducers. Acta Informatica, 26(1):131-192, October 1988. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915449.
13. J. Y. Girard. Linear logic. TCS, 50:1-102, 1987.
14. M Kanazawa and R Yoshinaka. Distributional learning and context/substructure enumerability in nonlinear tree grammars. In Formal Grammar, pages 94-111. Springer, 2016.
15. Makoto Kanazawa. Almost affine lambda terms. National Institute of Informatics, 2012.
16. Naoki Kobayashi, Naoshi Tabuchi, and Hiroshi Unno. Higher-order multi-parameter tree transducers and recursion schemes for program verification. SIGPLAN Not., 45(1):495-508, January 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1707801.1706355.
17. J. Thatcher and J. Wright. Generalized Finite Automata Theory With an Application to a Decision Problem of Second-Order Logic. Mathematical Systems Theory, 2(1):57-81, 1968.
18. Akihiko Tozawa. Xml type checking using high-level tree transducer. In Masami Hagiya and Philip Wadler, editors, Functional and Logic Programming, pages 81-96, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.