We propose weaker but constructively provable variants of the contrapositive of Kőnig’s lemma. We derive those from a generalization of the FAN theorem for inductive bars to inductive covers, for which we give a concise proof. We compare the positive, negative and sequential characterizations of covers and bars in classical and constructive contexts, giving precise accounts of the role played by the axioms of excluded middle and dependent choice. As an application, we discuss some examples where the use of Kőnig’s lemma can be replaced by one of our weaker variants to obtain fully constructive accounts of results or proofs that could otherwise appear as inherently classical.
@InProceedings{larcheywendling:LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.2, author = {Larchey-Wendling, Dominique}, title = {{Constructive Substitutes for K\H{o}nig’s Lemma}}, booktitle = {30th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2024)}, pages = {2:1--2:23}, series = {Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)}, ISBN = {978-3-95977-376-8}, ISSN = {1868-8969}, year = {2025}, volume = {336}, editor = {M{\o}gelberg, Rasmus Ejlers and van den Berg, Benno}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik}, address = {Dagstuhl, Germany}, URL = {https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.2}, URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233644}, doi = {10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.2}, annote = {Keywords: K\H{o}nig’s lemma, FAN theorem, constructive mathematics, inductive covers, inductive bars, almost full relations, inductive type theory, Coq} }
Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing