Document Open Access Logo

Scientific Whispers: Mapping Innovative Pedagogies in STEAM and Programming Education

Authors Margarida Antunes , António Trigo

PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

OASIcs.ICPEC.2024.8.pdf
  • Filesize: 1.04 MB
  • 12 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Margarida Antunes
  • Polytechnic University of Coimbra, Portugal
António Trigo
  • Polytechnic University of Coimbra, Portugal
  • CEOS.PP, ISCAP, Polytechnic of Porto, Portugal

Acknowledgements

A special acknowledgment is extended to the reviewers, for their diligent analysis, which has greatly contributed to enhancing not only this work but also the more comprehensive project currently under development.

Cite AsGet BibTex

Margarida Antunes and António Trigo. Scientific Whispers: Mapping Innovative Pedagogies in STEAM and Programming Education. In 5th International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2024). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 122, pp. 8:1-8:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)
https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.ICPEC.2024.8

Abstract

Traditional education, especially in STEAM and programming, faces several challenges in capturing the attention and stimulating the new student generation. These challenges are exacerbated by rigid teaching methods and reflect a global difficulty in the educational sector, primarily stemming from the disconnect between traditional teaching and the contemporary needs of the modern world. This article presents a systematic literature review with a mapping study to explore innovative approaches currently employed in teaching, specifically focusing on STEAM and programming education. The conclusions reached make a significant contribution to the field of education, and the mapping conducted has identified the teaching methodologies most researched and investigated by the scientific community. This research also presents a classifying proposal for those methodologies, considering their characteristics and weighing up three dimensions: resources, implementation and receptiveness. As a final reflection, some emerging methodologies were identified that are believed to have great potential to be used for STEAM and programming education.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Applied computing → Education
  • Software and its engineering → General programming languages
Keywords
  • Education
  • STEAM Education
  • Programming Education
  • Teaching Methodologies
  • Innovative Approaches
  • Mapping
  • Systematic Literature Review

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
    0
    Metadata Views

References

  1. Paulo André Pimenta Aragão and Rogéria Cristiane Gratão de Souza. Scrum xperience: A new approach for agile teaching. In Marcelo de Almeida Maia, Fabiano A. Dorça, Rafael Dias Araújo, Christina von Flach, Elisa Yumi Nakagawa, and Edna Dias Canedo, editors, SBES 2022: XXXVI Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, Virtual Event Brazil, October 5 - 7, 2022, pages 134-142, New York, NY, USA, October 2022. ACM. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3555228.3555255.
  2. Michael E. Caspersen and Jens Bennedsen. Instructional design of a programming course: a learning theoretic approach. In Richard J. Anderson, Sally Fincher, and Mark Guzdial, editors, International Computing Education Research Workshop, ICER '07, Atlanta, GA, USA, September 15-16, 2007, pages 111-122, New York, NY, USA, September 2007. ACM. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1288580.1288595.
  3. I Dauksevicuite. Unlocking the full potential of digital native learners. Henley Business School, 2016. Google Scholar
  4. Edward L. Deci, Robert J. Vallerand, Luc G. Pelletier, and Richard M. Ryan. Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4):325-346, June 1991. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137.
  5. Darina Dicheva, Christo Dichev, Gennady Agre, and Galia Angelova. Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Journal of educational technology & society, 18(3):75-88, 2015. URL: https://www.j-ets.net/ETS/journals/18_3/6.pdf.
  6. D. Randy Garrison. E-Learning in the 21st Century. Routledge, March 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838761.
  7. Re'Shanda Grace-Bridges. Generation Z Goes to College. Journal of College Orientation, Transition, and Retention, 25(1), January 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.24926/jcotr.v25i1.2919.
  8. Hélia Guerra, Luís Mendes Gomes, and Alberto Cardoso. Agile approach to a cs2-based course using the jupyter notebook in lab classes. In 2019 5th Experiment International Conference (exp.at'19), Funchal (Madeira Island), Portugal, June 12-14, 2019, pages 177-182. IEEE, June 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/EXPAT.2019.8876536.
  9. Louise Hainline, Michael Gaines, Cheryl Long Feather, Elaine Padilla, and Esther Terry. Changing students, faculty, and institutions in the twenty-first century. Peer Review, 12(3):7-11, 2010. Google Scholar
  10. Barbara Kitchenham. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004):1-26, 2004. Google Scholar
  11. Barbara Kitchenham, Stuart Charters, et al. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering, 2007. Google Scholar
  12. Tilman Michaeli and Ralf Romeike. Investigating students' preexisting debugging traits: A real world escape room study. In Nick Falkner and Otto Seppälä, editors, Koli Calling '20: 20th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli, Finland, November 19-22, 2020, pages 15:1-15:10, New York, NY, USA, November 2020. ACM. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3428029.3428044.
  13. Diana G. Oblinger. The Next Generation of Educational Engagement. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2004(1):10, May 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.5334/2004-8-oblinger.
  14. Marc Prensky. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2: Do They Really Think Differently? On the Horizon, 9(6):1-6, January 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843.
  15. Lisa Romkey, Daniel Munro, Virginia Hall, and Tracy Ross. Evaluation of a Work-Integrated Learning Program for Undergraduate STEM Outreach Instructors. In 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. ASEE Conferences, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--43464.
  16. Darla Rothman. A tsunami of learners called generation z, 2016. Google Scholar
  17. Tatjana Sidekerskienė and Robertas Damaševičius. Out-of-the-Box Learning: Digital Escape Rooms as a Metaphor for Breaking Down Barriers in STEM Education. Sustainability, 15(9):7393, April 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097393.
  18. Rainer Telesko, Maja Spahic-Bogdanovic, Knut Hinkelmann, and Charuta Pande. A new approach for teaching programming: Model-based agile programming (MBAD). In The 8th International Conference on Information and Education Innovations, ICIEI 2023, Manchester, United Kingdom, April 13-15, 2023, pages 13-18, New York, NY, USA, April 2023. ACM. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3594441.3594445.
  19. Jean M Twenge. iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy-and completely unprepared for adulthood-and what that means for the rest of us. Simon and Schuster, 2017. Google Scholar
  20. Elena Verdú, Luisa M. Regueras, María J. Verdú, José P. Leal, Juan P. de Castro, and Ricardo Queirós. A distributed system for learning programming on-line. Computers & Education, 58(1):1-10, January 2012. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.015.
  21. Jane Webster and Richard T Watson. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS quarterly, pages xiii-xxiii, 2002. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact