To reduce complexity while computing an upper bound on the worst-case execution time, static WCET analysis performs over-approximations. This feeds the general feeling that static WCET estimations can be far above the real WCET. This feeling is strengthened when these estimations are compared to measured execution times: generally, it is very unlikely to capture the worstcase from observations, then the difference between the highest watermark and the proven WCET upper bound might be considerable. In this paper, we introduce a framework to quantify the possible overestimation on WCET upper bounds obtained by static analysis. The objective is to derive a lower bound on the WCET to complement the upper bound.
@InProceedings{casse_et_al:OASIcs.WCET.2015.1, author = {Cass\'{e}, Hugues and Ozaktas, Haluk and Rochange, Christine}, title = {{A Framework to Quantify the Overestimations of Static WCET Analysis}}, booktitle = {15th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2015)}, pages = {1--10}, series = {Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)}, ISBN = {978-3-939897-95-8}, ISSN = {2190-6807}, year = {2015}, volume = {47}, editor = {Cazorla, Francisco J.}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik}, address = {Dagstuhl, Germany}, URL = {https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2015.1}, URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-52517}, doi = {10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2015.1}, annote = {Keywords: Static WCET analysis, uncertainty, overestimation, cache analysis} }
Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing