Document Open Access Logo

Rule Learning over Knowledge Graphs: A Review

Authors Hong Wu , Zhe Wang , Kewen Wang , Pouya Ghiasnezhad Omran , Jiangmeng Li

PDF HTML 5

Files

Thumbnail PDF
PDF
TGDK.1.1.7.pdf
  • Filesize: 1.18 MB
  • 23 pages
HTML5 Logo HTML (experimental)
TGDK.1.1.7.html

Document Identifiers

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Computing methodologies → Knowledge representation and reasoning
  • Information systems → Data mining
Keywords
  • Rule learning
  • Knowledge graphs
  • Link prediction

Metrics

Abstract

Compared to black-box neural networks, logic rules express explicit knowledge, can provide human-understandable explanations for reasoning processes, and have found their wide application in knowledge graphs and other downstream tasks. As extracting rules manually from large knowledge graphs is labour-intensive and often infeasible, automated rule learning has recently attracted significant interest, and a number of approaches to rule learning for knowledge graphs have been proposed. This survey aims to provide a review of approaches and a classification of state-of-the-art systems for learning first-order logic rules over knowledge graphs. A comparative analysis of various approaches to rule learning is conducted based on rule language biases, underlying methods, and evaluation metrics. The approaches we consider include inductive logic programming (ILP)-based, statistical path generalisation, and neuro-symbolic methods. Moreover, we highlight important and promising application scenarios of rule learning, such as rule-based knowledge graph completion, fact checking, and applications in other research areas.

Cite As Get BibTex

Hong Wu, Zhe Wang, Kewen Wang, Pouya Ghiasnezhad Omran, and Jiangmeng Li. Rule Learning over Knowledge Graphs: A Review. In Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 1, Issue 1, pp. 7:1-7:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023) https://doi.org/10.4230/TGDK.1.1.7

Author Details

Hong Wu
  • School of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Australia
Zhe Wang
  • School of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Australia
Kewen Wang
  • School of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Australia
Pouya Ghiasnezhad Omran
  • School of Computing, The Australian National University, Australia
Jiangmeng Li
  • Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editors and the anonymous referees for their constructive comments that have helped improve the quality of this paper.

References

  1. Naser Ahmadi, Joohyung Lee, Paolo Papotti, and Mohammed Saeed. Explainable fact checking with probabilistic answer set programming. In Proceedings of the 2019 Truth and Trust Online Conference (TTO-19), London, UK, October 4-5, 2019, 2019. URL: https://truthandtrustonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/paper_15.pdf.
  2. Fotis Aisopos and Georgios Paliouras. Comparing methods for drug-gene interaction prediction on the biomedical literature knowledge graph: performance versus explainability. BMC Bioinform., 24(1):272, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/S12859-023-05373-2.
  3. Sören Auer, Christian Bizer, Georgi Kobilarov, Jens Lehmann, Richard Cyganiak, and Zachary G. Ives. Dbpedia: A nucleus for a web of open data. In Proceedings of the 6th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-07), Busan, Korea, November 11-15, 2007, volume 4825, pages 722-735. Springer, 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52.
  4. Molood Barati, Quan Bai, and Qing Liu. SWARM: an approach for mining semantic association rules from semantic web data. In Proceedings of the 14th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI-16), Phuket, Thailand, August 22-26, 2016, volume 9810, pages 30-43. Springer, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42911-3_3.
  5. Molood Barati, Quan Bai, and Qing Liu. Mining semantic association rules from RDF data. Knowl. Based Syst., 133:183-196, 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.KNOSYS.2017.07.009.
  6. Luigi Bellomarini, Davide Benedetto, Georg Gottlob, and Emanuel Sallinger. Vadalog: A modern architecture for automated reasoning with large knowledge graphs. Inf. Syst., 105:101528, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IS.2020.101528.
  7. Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler, and Ora Lassila. The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5):34-43, 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0501-3.
  8. Kurt D. Bollacker, Colin Evans, Praveen K. Paritosh, Tim Sturge, and Jamie Taylor. Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD-08), Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 10-12, 2008, pages 1247-1250. ACM, 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1376616.1376746.
  9. Agustín Borrego, Daniel Ayala, Inma Hernández, Carlos R. Rivero, and David Ruiz. Generating rules to filter candidate triples for their correctness checking by knowledge graph completion techniques. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP-19), Marina Del Rey, CA, USA, November 19-21, 2019, pages 115-122. ACM, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3360901.3364418.
  10. Yixin Cao, Zhiyuan Liu, Chengjiang Li, Zhiyuan Liu, Juanzi Li, and Tat-Seng Chua. Multi-channel graph neural network for entity alignment. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-19), Florence, Italy, July 28- August 2, pages 1452-1461. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/P19-1140.
  11. Lihan Chen, Sihang Jiang, Jingping Liu, Chao Wang, Sheng Zhang, Chenhao Xie, Jiaqing Liang, Yanghua Xiao, and Rui Song. Rule mining over knowledge graphs via reinforcement learning. Knowl. Based Syst., 242:108371, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.KNOSYS.2022.108371.
  12. Yang Chen, Sean Goldberg, Daisy Zhe Wang, and Soumitra Siddharth Johri. Ontological pathfinding. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data Conference (SIGMOD-16), San Francisco, CA, USA, June 26 -July 01, 2016, pages 835-846. ACM, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2882903.2882954.
  13. Yang Chen, Daisy Zhe Wang, and Sean Goldberg. Scalekb: scalable learning and inference over large knowledge bases. VLDB J., 25(6):893-918, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00778-016-0444-3.
  14. Kewei Cheng, Jiahao Liu, Wei Wang, and Yizhou Sun. Rlogic: Recursive logical rule learning from knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-22), Washington, DC, USA, August 14 - 18, 2022, pages 179-189. ACM, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3534678.3539421.
  15. Andrew Cropper, Sebastijan Dumancic, Richard Evans, and Stephen H. Muggleton. Inductive logic programming at 30. Mach. Learn., 111(1):147-172, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10994-021-06089-1.
  16. David Jaime Tena Cucala, Bernardo Cuenca Grau, Egor V. Kostylev, and Boris Motik. Explainable gnn-based models over knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR-22), Virtual Event, April 25-29, 2022. OpenReview.net, 2022. URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id=CrCvGNHAIrz.
  17. Boyang Ding, Quan Wang, Bin Wang, and Li Guo. Improving knowledge graph embedding using simple constraints. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-18), Melbourne, Australia, July 15-20, 2018, pages 110-121. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/P18-1011.
  18. Xin Dong, Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Geremy Heitz, Wilko Horn, Ni Lao, Kevin Murphy, Thomas Strohmann, Shaohua Sun, and Wei Zhang. Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-14), New York, USA, August 24-27, 2014, pages 601-610. ACM, 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2623330.2623623.
  19. Facebook. Graph api - facebook for developers. https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-api/, 2022.
  20. Valeria Fionda and Giuseppe Pirrò. Fact checking via evidence patterns. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-18), July 13-19, 2018, Stockholm, Sweden, pages 3755-3761. ijcai.org, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.24963/IJCAI.2018/522.
  21. Mohamed H. Gad-Elrab, Daria Stepanova, Jacopo Urbani, and Gerhard Weikum. Exception-enriched rule learning from knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 15th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-16), Kobe, Japan, October 17-21, 2016, pages 234-251, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46523-4_15.
  22. Mohamed H. Gad-Elrab, Daria Stepanova, Jacopo Urbani, and Gerhard Weikum. Exfakt: A framework for explaining facts over knowledge graphs and text. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM-19), Melbourne, VIC, Australia, February 11-15, 2019, pages 87-95. ACM, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3289600.3290996.
  23. Luis Galárraga, Christina Teflioudi, Katja Hose, and Fabian M. Suchanek. Fast rule mining in ontological knowledge bases with AMIE+. VLDB J., 24(6):707-730, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00778-015-0394-1.
  24. Luis Antonio Galárraga, Christina Teflioudi, Katja Hose, and Fabian M. Suchanek. AMIE: association rule mining under incomplete evidence in ontological knowledge bases. In Proceedings of the 22nd International World Wide Web Conference (WWW-13), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, May 13-17, 2013, pages 413-422. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee / ACM, 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.2488425.
  25. Matt Gardner, Partha P. Talukdar, and Tom Michael Mitchell. Combining vector space embeddings with symbolic logical inference over open-domain text. In Proceedings of the 2015 AAAI Spring Symposia, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA, March 22-25, 2015. AAAI Press, 2015. URL: http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/SSS/SSS15/paper/view/10230.
  26. Lise Getoor and Ben Taskar. Introduction to statistical relational learning. MIT press, 2007. Google Scholar
  27. Shu Guo, Lin Li, Zhen Hui, Lingshuai Meng, Bingnan Ma, Wei Liu, Lihong Wang, Haibin Zhai, and Hong Zhang. Knowledge graph embedding preserving soft logical regularity. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM-20), Virtual Event, Ireland, October 19-23, 2020, pages 425-434. ACM, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3412055.
  28. Shu Guo, Quan Wang, Lihong Wang, Bin Wang, and Li Guo. Jointly embedding knowledge graphs and logical rules. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-16), Austin, Texas, USA, November 1-4, 2016, pages 192-202. The Association for Computational Linguistics, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/D16-1019.
  29. Shu Guo, Quan Wang, Lihong Wang, Bin Wang, and Li Guo. Knowledge graph embedding with iterative guidance from soft rules. In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-18), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, February 2-7, 2018, pages 4816-4823. AAAI Press, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1609/AAAI.V32I1.11918.
  30. Petr Hájek. Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic, volume 4. Kluwer, 1998. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5300-3.
  31. Vinh Thinh Ho, Daria Stepanova, Mohamed H. Gad-Elrab, Evgeny Kharlamov, and Gerhard Weikum. Rule learning from knowledge graphs guided by embedding models. In Proceedings of the 17th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-18), Monterey, CA, USA, October 8-12, 2018, volume 11136, pages 72-90. Springer, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00671-6_5.
  32. Zhongni Hou, Xiaolong Jin, Zixuan Li, and Long Bai. Rule-aware reinforcement learning for knowledge graph reasoning. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL/IJCNLP-21), Online Event, August 1-6, 2021, volume ACL/IJCNLP 2021, pages 4687-4692. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/2021.FINDINGS-ACL.412.
  33. Katsumi Inoue and Yoshimitsu Kudoh. Learning extended logic programs. In Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-97), Nagoya, Japan, August 23-29, 1997, 2 Volumes, pages 176-181. Morgan Kaufmann, 1997. URL: http://ijcai.org/Proceedings/97-1/Papers/029.pdf.
  34. Lei Ji. Knowledge mining api - microsoft research. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/knowledge-mining-api/, 2016.
  35. Shaoxiong Ji, Shirui Pan, Erik Cambria, Pekka Marttinen, and Philip S. Yu. A survey on knowledge graphs: Representation, acquisition, and applications. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., 33(2):494-514, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3070843.
  36. Tingting Jiang, Chenyang Bu, Yi Zhu, and Xindong Wu. Two-stage entity alignment: Combining hybrid knowledge graph embedding with similarity-based relation alignment. In Proceedings of the 16th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI-19), Cuvu, Yanuca Island, Fiji, August 26-30, 2019, volume 11670, pages 162-175. Springer, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29908-8_13.
  37. Jonathan Lajus, Luis Galárraga, and Fabian M. Suchanek. Fast and exact rule mining with AMIE 3. In Proceedings of the 17th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC-20), Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 31-June 4, 2020, volume 12123, pages 36-52. Springer, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49461-2_3.
  38. Ni Lao, Einat Minkov, and William W. Cohen. Learning relational features with backward random walks. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-15), July 26-31, 2015, Beijing, China, pages 666-675. The Association for Computer Linguistics, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.3115/V1/P15-1065.
  39. Deren Lei, Gangrong Jiang, Xiaotao Gu, Kexuan Sun, Yuning Mao, and Xiang Ren. Learning collaborative agents with rule guidance for knowledge graph reasoning. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-20), Online, November 16-20, 2020, pages 8541-8547. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/2020.EMNLP-MAIN.688.
  40. Peng Lin, Qi Song, Jialiang Shen, and Yinghui Wu. Discovering graph patterns for fact checking in knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA-18), Gold Coast, QLD, Australia, May 21-24, 2018, volume 10827, pages 783-801. Springer, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91452-7_50.
  41. Peng Lin, Qi Song, and Yinghui Wu. Fact checking in knowledge graphs with ontological subgraph patterns. Data Sci. Eng., 3(4):341-358, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S41019-018-0082-4.
  42. Yushan Liu, Yunpu Ma, Marcel Hildebrandt, Mitchell Joblin, and Volker Tresp. Tlogic: Temporal logical rules for explainable link forecasting on temporal knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-22), Virtual Event, February 22 - March 1, 2022, pages 4120-4127. AAAI Press, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1609/AAAI.V36I4.20330.
  43. Christian Meilicke, Melisachew Wudage Chekol, Manuel Fink, and Heiner Stuckenschmidt. Reinforced anytime bottom up rule learning for knowledge graph completion. CoRR, abs/2004.04412, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.04412.
  44. Christian Meilicke, Melisachew Wudage Chekol, Daniel Ruffinelli, and Heiner Stuckenschmidt. Anytime bottom-up rule learning for knowledge graph completion. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-19), Macao, China, August 10-16, 2019, pages 3137-3143. ijcai.org, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.24963/IJCAI.2019/435.
  45. Christian Meilicke, Manuel Fink, Yanjie Wang, Daniel Ruffinelli, Rainer Gemulla, and Heiner Stuckenschmidt. Fine-grained evaluation of rule- and embedding-based systems for knowledge graph completion. In Proceedings of the 17th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-18), Monterey, CA, USA, October 8-12, 2018, volume 11136, pages 3-20. Springer, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00671-6_1.
  46. George A. Miller. Wordnet: A lexical database for english. Commun. ACM, 38(11):39-41, 1995. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219748.
  47. Stephen H. Muggleton. Inductive logic programming. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Algorithmic Learning Theory (ALT-90), Tokyo, Japan, October 8-10, 1990, pages 42-62. Springer/Ohmsha, 1990. Google Scholar
  48. Radford M. Neal and Geoffrey E. Hinton. A view of the em algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse, and other variants. In Learning in Graphical Models, volume 89, pages 355-368. Springer Netherlands, 1998. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5014-9_12.
  49. Maximilian Nickel, Kevin Murphy, Volker Tresp, and Evgeniy Gabrilovich. A review of relational machine learning for knowledge graphs. IEEE, 104(no. 1):11-33, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2015.2483592.
  50. Guanglin Niu, Yongfei Zhang, Bo Li, Peng Cui, Si Liu, Jingyang Li, and Xiaowei Zhang. Rule-guided compositional representation learning on knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-20), New York, NY, USA, February 7-12, 2020, pages 2950-2958. AAAI Press, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1609/AAAI.V34I03.5687.
  51. Pouya Ghiasnezhad Omran, Kewen Wang, and Zhe Wang. Scalable rule learning via learning representation. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-18), July 13-19, 2018, Stockholm, Sweden, pages 2149-2155. ijcai.org, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.24963/IJCAI.2018/297.
  52. Pouya Ghiasnezhad Omran, Kewen Wang, and Zhe Wang. Learning temporal rules from knowledge graph streams. In Proceedings of the AAAI 2019 Spring Symposium on Combining Machine Learning with Knowledge Engineering (AAAI-MAKE-19), Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA, March 25-27, 2019, volume 2350. CEUR-WS.org, 2019. URL: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2350/paper15.pdf.
  53. Pouya Ghiasnezhad Omran, Zhe Wang, and Kewen Wang. Knowledge graph rule mining via transfer learning. In Proceedings of the 23th Pacific-Asia Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining Conference (PAKDD-19), Macau, China, April 14-17, 2019, volume 11441, pages 489-500. Springer, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16142-2_38.
  54. Stefano Ortona, Venkata Vamsikrishna Meduri, and Paolo Papotti. Rudik: Rule discovery in knowledge bases. PVLDB, 11(12):1946-1949, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.14778/3229863.3236231.
  55. Simon Ott, Christian Meilicke, and Matthias Samwald. SAFRAN: an interpretable, rule-based link prediction method outperforming embedding models. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Automated Knowledge Base Construction (AKBC-21), Virtual, October 4-8, 2021, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.24432/C5MK57.
  56. Giuseppe Pirrò. Relatedness and tbox-driven rule learning in large knowledge bases. In Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI-20), New York, NY, USA, February 7-12, 2020, pages 2975-2982. AAAI Press, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1609/AAAI.V34I03.5690.
  57. Meng Qu, Junkun Chen, Louis-Pascal A. C. Xhonneux, Yoshua Bengio, and Jian Tang. Rnnlogic: Learning logic rules for reasoning on knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR-21), Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021. OpenReview.net, 2021. URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id=tGZu6DlbreV.
  58. Meng Qu and Jian Tang. Probabilistic logic neural networks for reasoning. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019 (NeurIPS-19), December 8-14, 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pages 7710-7720, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.08495.
  59. Mouli Rastogi, Syed Afshan Ali, Mrinal Rawat, Lovekesh Vig, Puneet Agarwal, Gautam Shroff, and Ashwin Srinivasan. Information extraction from document images via FCA based template detection and knowledge graph rule induction. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW-20), Seattle, WA, USA, June 14-19, 2020, pages 2377-2385. Computer Vision Foundation / IEEE, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW50498.2020.00287.
  60. Matthew Richardson and Pedro M. Domingos. Markov logic networks. Mach. Learn., 62(1-2):107-136, 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10994-006-5833-1.
  61. Andrea Rossi, Denilson Barbosa, Donatella Firmani, Antonio Matinata, and Paolo Merialdo. Knowledge graph embedding for link prediction: A comparative analysis. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data, 15(2):14:1-14:49, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3424672.
  62. Ali Sadeghian, Mohammadreza Armandpour, Patrick Ding, and Daisy Zhe Wang. DRUM: end-to-end differentiable rule mining on knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS-19), December 8-14, 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pages 15321-15331, 2019. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/hash/0c72cb7ee1512f800abe27823a792d03-Abstract.html.
  63. Mohammed Saeed, Naser Ahmadi, Preslav Nakov, and Paolo Papotti. Rulebert: Teaching soft rules to pre-trained language models. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-21), Virtual Event / Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, 7-11 November, 2021, pages 1460-1476. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/2021.EMNLP-MAIN.110.
  64. Chiaki Sakama. Induction from answer sets in nonmonotonic logic programs. ACM Trans. Comput. Log., 6(2):203-231, 2005. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1055686.1055687.
  65. Abdus Salam, Rolf Schwitter, and Mehmet A. Orgun. Probabilistic rule learning systems: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv., 54(4):79:1-79:16, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3447581.
  66. Kara Schatz, Cleber C. Melo-Filho, Alexander Tropsha, and Rada Chirkova. Explaining drug-discovery hypotheses using knowledge-graph patterns. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Orlando, FL, USA, December 15-18, 2021, pages 3709-3716. IEEE, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/BIGDATA52589.2021.9672006.
  67. Baoxu Shi and Tim Weninger. Discriminative predicate path mining for fact checking in knowledge graphs. Knowl. Based Syst., 104:123-133, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.KNOSYS.2016.04.015.
  68. Ashwin Srinivasan. The aleph manual, 2007. URL: https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/activities/programinduction/Aleph/aleph_toc.html.
  69. Fabian M. Suchanek, Gjergji Kasneci, and Gerhard Weikum. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW-07), Banff, Alberta, Canada, May 8-12, 2007, pages 697-706. ACM, 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1242572.1242667.
  70. Qilin Sun and Weizhuo Li. Rukbc-qa: A framework for question answering over incomplete kbs enhanced with rules injection. In Proceedings of the 9th Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing (NLPCC-20), Zhengzhou, China, October 14-18, 2020, volume 12431, pages 82-94. Springer, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60457-8_7.
  71. Martin Svatos, Steven Schockaert, Jesse Davis, and Ondrej Kuzelka. Strike: Rule-driven relational learning using stratified k-entailment. In Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-20), 29 August-8 September 2020, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, volume 325, pages 1515-1522. IOS Press, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200259.
  72. Thomas Pellissier Tanon, Daria Stepanova, Simon Razniewski, Paramita Mirza, and Gerhard Weikum. Completeness-aware rule learning from knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 16th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-17), Vienna, Austria, October 21-25, 2017, volume 10587, pages 507-525. Springer, 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68288-4_30.
  73. Thomas Pellissier Tanon, Daria Stepanova, Simon Razniewski, Paramita Mirza, and Gerhard Weikum. Completeness-aware rule learning from knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-18), July 13-19, 2018, Stockholm, Sweden, pages 5339-5343. ijcai.org, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.24963/IJCAI.2018/749.
  74. Komal K. Teru, Etienne G. Denis, and William L. Hamilton. Inductive relation prediction by subgraph reasoning. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-20), 13-18 July 2020, Virtual Event, volume 119, pages 9448-9457. PMLR, 2020. URL: http://proceedings.mlr.press/v119/teru20a.html.
  75. Hai Dang Tran, Daria Stepanova, Mohamed H. Gad-Elrab, Francesca A. Lisi, and Gerhard Weikum. Towards nonmonotonic relational learning from knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP-16), London, UK, September 4-6, 2016, volume 10326, pages 94-107. Springer, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63342-8_8.
  76. Denny Vrandecic and Markus Krötzsch. Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM, 57(10):78-85, 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2629489.
  77. Po-Wei Wang, Daria Stepanova, Csaba Domokos, and J. Zico Kolter. Differentiable learning of numerical rules in knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR-20), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020. OpenReview.net, 2020. URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id=rJleKgrKwS.
  78. Quan Wang, Bin Wang, and Li Guo. Knowledge base completion using embeddings and rules. In Proceedings of the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-15), Buenos Aires, Argentina, July 25-31, 2015, pages 1859-1866. AAAI Press, 2015. URL: http://ijcai.org/Abstract/15/264.
  79. William Yang Wang and William W. Cohen. Joint information extraction and reasoning: A scalable statistical relational learning approach. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-15), July 26-31, 2015, Beijing, China, pages 355-364. The Association for Computer Linguistics, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.3115/V1/P15-1035.
  80. William Yang Wang, Kathryn Mazaitis, and William W. Cohen. Structure learning via parameter learning. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM-14), Shanghai, China, November 3-7, 2014, pages 1199-1208. ACM, 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2661829.2662022.
  81. Zhichun Wang and Juan-Zi Li. Rdf2rules: Learning rules from RDF knowledge bases by mining frequent predicate cycles. CoRR, abs/1512.07734, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1512.07734.
  82. Hong Wu, Zhe Wang, Kewen Wang, and Yi-Dong Shen. Learning typed rules over knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-22), Haifa, Israel, July 31-August 5, 2022, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2022/51.
  83. Hong Wu, Zhe Wang, Xiaowang Zhang, Pouya Ghiasnezhad Omran, Zhiyong Feng, and Kewen Wang. A system for reasoning-based link prediction in large knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 18th International Semantic Web Conference Satellite Tracks (Posters & Demonstrations, Industry, and Outrageous Ideas) (ISWC-19), Auckland, New Zealand, October 26-30, 2019, volume 2456, pages 121-124. CEUR-WS.org, 2019. URL: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2456/paper32.pdf.
  84. Lianlong Wu, Emanuel Sallinger, Evgeny Sherkhonov, Sahar Vahdati, and Georg Gottlob. Rule learning over knowledge graphs with genetic logic programming. In Proceedings of the 38th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE-22), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, May 9-12, 2022, pages 3373-3385. IEEE, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE53745.2022.00318.
  85. Yi Xia, Junyong Luo, Mingjing Lan, Gang Zhou, Zhibo Li, and Shuo Liu. Reason more like human: Incorporating meta information into hierarchical reinforcement learning for knowledge graph reasoning. Appl. Intell., 53(11):13293-13308, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10489-022-04147-2.
  86. Wenhan Xiong, Thien Hoang, and William Yang Wang. Deeppath: A reinforcement learning method for knowledge graph reasoning. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-17), Copenhagen, Denmark, September 9-11, 2017, pages 564-573. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/D17-1060.
  87. Zezhong Xu, Peng Ye, Hui Chen, Meng Zhao, Huajun Chen, and Wen Zhang. Ruleformer: Context-aware rule mining over knowledge graph. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-22), Gyeongju, Republic of Korea, October 12-17, 2022, pages 2551-2560. International Committee on Computational Linguistics, 2022. URL: https://aclanthology.org/2022.coling-1.225.
  88. Bishan Yang, Wen-tau Yih, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, and Li Deng. Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR-2015), San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, 2015. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6575.
  89. Fan Yang, Zhilin Yang, and William W. Cohen. Differentiable learning of logical rules for knowledge base reasoning. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS-17), December 4-9, 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, pages 2319-2328, 2017. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/0e55666a4ad822e0e34299df3591d979-Abstract.html.
  90. Yuan Yang, James Clayton Kerce, and Faramarz Fekri. LOGICDEF: an interpretable defense framework against adversarial examples via inductive scene graph reasoning. In Proceedings of the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-22), Virtual Event, February 22 - March 1, 2022, pages 8840-8848. AAAI Press, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1609/AAAI.V36I8.20865.
  91. Zijun Yao, Yantao Liu, Xin Lv, Shulin Cao, Jifan Yu, Juanzi Li, and Lei Hou. Korc: Knowledge oriented reading comprehension benchmark for deep text understanding. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-23), Toronto, Canada, July 9-14, 2023, pages 11689-11707. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/2023.FINDINGS-ACL.743.
  92. Qiang Zeng, Jignesh M. Patel, and David Page. Quickfoil: Scalable inductive logic programming. Proc. VLDB Endow., 8(3):197-208, 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.14778/2735508.2735510.
  93. Jindou Zhang and Jing Li. Enhanced knowledge graph embedding by jointly learning soft rules and facts. Algorithms, 12(12):265, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/A12120265.
  94. Wen Zhang, Bibek Paudel, Liang Wang, Jiaoyan Chen, Hai Zhu, Wei Zhang, Abraham Bernstein, and Huajun Chen. Iteratively learning embeddings and rules for knowledge graph reasoning. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference (WWW-19), San Francisco, CA, USA, May 13-17, 2019, pages 2366-2377. ACM, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313612.
  95. Zhenghao Zhang, Jianbin Huang, and Qinglin Tan. Association rules enhanced knowledge graph attention network. Knowl. Based Syst., 239:108038, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.KNOSYS.2021.108038.
Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2025 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact