2 Search Results for "MacLean, Scott"


Document
A Certified Proof Checker for Deep Neural Network Verification in Imandra

Authors: Remi Desmartin, Omri Isac, Grant Passmore, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Kathrin Stark, and Guy Katz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)


Abstract
Recent advances in the verification of deep neural networks (DNNs) have opened the way for a broader usage of DNN verification technology in many application areas, including safety-critical ones. However, DNN verifiers are themselves complex programs that have been shown to be susceptible to errors and numerical imprecision; this, in turn, has raised the question of trust in DNN verifiers. One prominent attempt to address this issue is enhancing DNN verifiers with the capability of producing certificates of their results that are subject to independent algorithmic checking. While formulations of Marabou certificate checking already exist on top of the state-of-the-art DNN verifier Marabou, they are implemented in C++, and that code itself raises the question of trust (e.g., in the precision of floating point calculations or guarantees for implementation soundness). Here, we present an alternative implementation of the Marabou certificate checking in Imandra - an industrial functional programming language and an interactive theorem prover (ITP) - that allows us to obtain full proof of certificate correctness. The significance of the result is two-fold. Firstly, it gives stronger independent guarantees for Marabou proofs. Secondly, it opens the way for the wider adoption of DNN verifiers in interactive theorem proving in the same way as many ITPs already incorporate SMT solvers.

Cite as

Remi Desmartin, Omri Isac, Grant Passmore, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Kathrin Stark, and Guy Katz. A Certified Proof Checker for Deep Neural Network Verification in Imandra. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 1:1-1:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{desmartin_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.1,
  author =	{Desmartin, Remi and Isac, Omri and Passmore, Grant and Komendantskaya, Ekaterina and Stark, Kathrin and Katz, Guy},
  title =	{{A Certified Proof Checker for Deep Neural Network Verification in Imandra}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246000},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Neural Network Verification, Farkas Lemma, Proof Certification}
}
Document
MathBrush: An Experimental Pen-Based Math System

Authors: George Labahn, Scott MacLean, Marzouk Mirette, Ian Rutherford, and David Tausky

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 6271, Challenges in Symbolic Computation Software (2006)


Abstract
It is widely believed that mathematics will be one of the major applications for Tablet PCs and other pen-based devices. In this paper we discuss many of the issues that make doing mathematics on such pen-based devices a hard task. We give a preliminary description of an experimental system, currently named MathBrush, for working with mathematics using pen-based devices. The system allows a user to enter mathematical expressions with a pen and to then do mathematical computation using a computer algebra system. The system provides a simple and easy way for users to verify the correctness of their handwritten expressions and, if needed, to correct any errors in recognition. Choosing mathematical operations is done making use of context menus, both with input and output expressions.

Cite as

George Labahn, Scott MacLean, Marzouk Mirette, Ian Rutherford, and David Tausky. MathBrush: An Experimental Pen-Based Math System. In Challenges in Symbolic Computation Software. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 6271, pp. 1-8, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2006)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{labahn_et_al:DagSemProc.06271.11,
  author =	{Labahn, George and MacLean, Scott and Marzouk Mirette and Rutherford, Ian and Tausky, David},
  title =	{{MathBrush: An Experimental Pen-Based Math System}},
  booktitle =	{Challenges in Symbolic Computation Software},
  pages =	{1--8},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2006},
  volume =	{6271},
  editor =	{Wolfram Decker and Mike Dewar and Erich Kaltofen and Stephen Watt},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.06271.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-7733},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.06271.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: PC Tablets, pen-based devices, computer algebra systems}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 2 Document/PDF
  • 1 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2025
  • 1 2006

  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Desmartin, Remi
  • 1 Isac, Omri
  • 1 Katz, Guy
  • 1 Komendantskaya, Ekaterina
  • 1 Labahn, George
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 1 LIPIcs
  • 1 DagSemProc

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Neural networks
  • 1 Software and its engineering → Formal software verification
  • 1 Software and its engineering → Functional languages
  • 1 Theory of computation → Logic and verification

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Farkas Lemma
  • 1 Neural Network Verification
  • 1 PC Tablets
  • 1 Proof Certification
  • 1 computer algebra systems
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail