7 Search Results for "Tsukada, Takeshi"

Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.4
Towards A Rosetta Stone of Interactive and Quantitative Semantics (Invited Talk)

Authors: Pierre Clairambault

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 363, 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)

Abstract
Quantitative semantics are those denotational semantics that inherit from linear logic [Jean-Yves Girard, 1987] a sensitivity to the multiplicity of resources involved in computation. Those include the relational model [Jean-Yves Girard, 1987] and its numerous variations (such as finiteness spaces [Thomas Ehrhard, 2005], weighted relational models [Jim Laird et al., 2013] and their extensions [Thomas Ehrhard et al., 2011; Thomas Ehrhard, 2002], generalized species of structure [Fiore et al., 2008], span models [Paul-André Melliès, 2019; Pierre Clairambault and Simon Forest, 2023], etc), as well as related syntactic methods such as non-idempotent intersection types [Daniel de Carvalho, 2018] and Taylor expansion of lambda-terms [Thomas Ehrhard and Laurent Regnier, 2003]. Interactive semantics are usually also quantitative, but in addition they present the interactive behaviour of proofs and programs, generally organized chronologically - those include the many variants of game semantics (starting with [J. M. E. Hyland and C.-H. Luke Ong, 2000; Samson Abramsky et al., 2000]), and other frameworks such as Geometry of Interaction [Girard, 1989] or ludics [Jean-Yves Girard, 2001]. Both families are cornerstones of modern denotational semantics, and both have associated Alonzo Church awards: game semantics in 2017, and quantitative semantics (in particular, differential linear logic and the differential λ-calculus) in 2024. It has more or less always been clear to the experts that the two, sharing an origin in linear logic, are conceptually related. Yet there are differences, which seem fundamental: in particular, while quantitative models compose relationally, the composition of strategies follows an intricate "parallel interaction plus hiding" process inspired from concurrency theory [Abramsky, 1997]. The two families of models have also historically targeted different kinds of languages: whereas quantitative semantics focused on theoretical calculi (and the λ-calculus in particular), game semantics is known for fully abstract models for languages with elaborate combinations of effects including local state [Samson Abramsky and Guy McCusker, 1996], control operators [James Laird, 1997], and concurrent primitives [Dan R. Ghica and Andrzej S. Murawski, 2008]. Early on, researchers have explored the relationship between the two [Thomas Ehrhard, 1996; Patrick Baillot et al., 1997], and investigations on this question have spanned decades [Pierre Boudes, 2009; Ana C. Calderon and Guy McCusker, 2010; Takeshi Tsukada and C.-H. Luke Ong, 2016; C.-H. Luke Ong, 2017]. In particular, Melliès' work on asynchronous games [Paul-André Melliès, 2006; Paul-André Melliès, 2005] made significant conceptual contributions, showing that the issue was enlightened by adopting a positional formulation of game semantics, where points in the relational model simply arise as certain positions. This talk surveys recent developments in this line of work, shedding light on the connection between those two families. Our work is set in so-called "thin concurrent games" [Simon Castellan et al., 2019; Pierre Clairambault, 2024], an extension with symmetry of Rideau and Winskel’s concurrent games on event structures [Silvain Rideau and Glynn Winskel, 2011]. Event structures being one of the main "truly concurrent" models of concurrency [Glynn Winskel, 1986], it is perhaps expected that thin concurrent games can model concurrent languages: they provide a truly concurrent refinement of Ghica and Murawski’s fully abstract model of Idealized Concurrent Algol [Simon Castellan and Pierre Clairambault, 2024; Pierre Clairambault, 2024]. But beyond the semantics of concurrency, thin concurrent games are also a deep reworking on game semantics built from causal principles, inheriting from asynchronous games a positional flavour. In thin concurrent games, strategies have a dual nature: an event-based nature where they appear as certain event structures composed via parallel interaction plus hiding; or a positional nature where they appear as certain spans of groupoids, composed by pullback (modulo a technical condition on strategies called visibility) - they can be regarded both as a games and a relational model! Leveraging this dual nature, in a sequence of papers with Castellan, de Visme, Olimpieri and Paquet, we have been able to link the single framework of thin concurrent games with numerous other models. This includes various traditional alternating or non-alternating games models [Simon Castellan and Pierre Clairambault, 2024; Pierre Clairambault, 2024], the weighted relational model [Pierre Clairambault and Hugo Paquet, 2021], the quantum relational model [Pierre Clairambault and Marc de Visme, 2020], generalized species of structure [Pierre Clairambault et al., 2023], and - going beyond quantitative semantics - the linear Scott model [Clairambault, 2025], a linear decomposition of standard Scott domain semantics [Thomas Ehrhard, 2012]. All these distinct models are obtained by projecting away certain aspects of thin concurrent games, giving some support to the claim that thin concurrent games are a Rosetta stone for interactive and quantitative semantics.
Cite as

Pierre Clairambault. Towards A Rosetta Stone of Interactive and Quantitative Semantics (Invited Talk). In 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 363, pp. 4:1-4:4, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{clairambault:LIPIcs.CSL.2026.4,
  author =	{Clairambault, Pierre},
  title =	{{Towards A Rosetta Stone of Interactive and Quantitative Semantics}},
  booktitle =	{34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:4},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-411-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{363},
  editor =	{Guerrini, Stefano and K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254286},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Denotational semantics, Game semantics}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2025.14
Pareto Fronts for Compositionally Solving String Diagrams of Parity Games

Authors: Kazuki Watanabe

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 342, 11th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science (CALCO 2025)

Abstract
Open parity games are proposed as a compositional extension of parity games with algebraic operations, forming string diagrams of parity games. A potential application of string diagrams of parity games is to describe a large parity game with a given compositional structure and solve it efficiently as a divide-and-conquer algorithm by exploiting its compositional structure. Building on our recent progress in open Markov decision processes, we introduce Pareto fronts of open parity games, offering a framework for multi-objective solutions. We establish the positional determinacy of open parity games with respect to their Pareto fronts through a novel translation method. Our translation converts an open parity game into a parity game tailored to a given single-objective. Furthermore, we present a simple algorithm for solving open parity games, derived from this translation that allows the application of existing efficient algorithms for parity games. Expanding on this foundation, we develop a compositional algorithm for string diagrams of parity games.
Cite as

Kazuki Watanabe. Pareto Fronts for Compositionally Solving String Diagrams of Parity Games. In 11th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science (CALCO 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 342, pp. 14:1-14:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{watanabe:LIPIcs.CALCO.2025.14,
  author =	{Watanabe, Kazuki},
  title =	{{Pareto Fronts for Compositionally Solving String Diagrams of Parity Games}},
  booktitle =	{11th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science (CALCO 2025)},
  pages =	{14:1--14:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-383-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{342},
  editor =	{C\^{i}rstea, Corina and Knapp, Alexander},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2025.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-235734},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2025.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: parity game, compositionality, string diagram}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2021.32
Output Without Delay: A π-Calculus Compatible with Categorical Semantics

Authors: Ken Sakayori and Takeshi Tsukada

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 195, 6th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2021)

Abstract
The quest for logical or categorical foundations of the π-calculus (not limited to session-typed variants) remains an important challenge. A categorical type theory correspondence for a variant of the i/o-typed π-calculus was recently revealed by Sakayori and Tsukada, but, at the same time, they exposed that this categorical semantics contradicts with most of the behavioural equivalences. This paper diagnoses the nature of this problem and attempts to fill the gap between categorical and operational semantics. We first identify the source of the problem to be the mismatch between the operational and categorical interpretation of a process called the forwarder. From the operational viewpoint, a forwarder may add an arbitrary delay when forwarding a message, whereas, from the categorical viewpoint, a forwarder must not add any delay when forwarding a message. Led by this observation, we introduce a calculus that can express forwarders that do not introduce delay. More specifically, the calculus we introduce is a variant of the π-calculus with a new operational semantics in which output actions are forced to happen as soon as they get unguarded. We show that this calculus (i) is compatible with the categorical semantics and (ii) can encode the standard π-calculus.
Cite as

Ken Sakayori and Takeshi Tsukada. Output Without Delay: A π-Calculus Compatible with Categorical Semantics. In 6th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 195, pp. 32:1-32:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sakayori_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2021.32,
  author =	{Sakayori, Ken and Tsukada, Takeshi},
  title =	{{Output Without Delay: A \pi-Calculus Compatible with Categorical Semantics}},
  booktitle =	{6th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2021)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-191-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{195},
  editor =	{Kobayashi, Naoki},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2021.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-142705},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2021.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: \pi-calculus, categorical semantics, linear approximation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2021.29
A Cyclic Proof System for HFL_ℕ

Authors: Mayuko Kori, Takeshi Tsukada, and Naoki Kobayashi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 183, 29th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2021)

Abstract
A cyclic proof system allows us to perform inductive reasoning without explicit inductions. We propose a cyclic proof system for HFL_ℕ, which is a higher-order predicate logic with natural numbers and alternating fixed-points. Ours is the first cyclic proof system for a higher-order logic, to our knowledge. Due to the presence of higher-order predicates and alternating fixed-points, our cyclic proof system requires a more delicate global condition on cyclic proofs than the original system of Brotherston and Simpson. We prove the decidability of checking the global condition and soundness of this system, and also prove a restricted form of standard completeness for an infinitary variant of our cyclic proof system. A potential application of our cyclic proof system is semi-automated verification of higher-order programs, based on Kobayashi et al.’s recent work on reductions from program verification to HFL_ℕ validity checking.
Cite as

Mayuko Kori, Takeshi Tsukada, and Naoki Kobayashi. A Cyclic Proof System for HFL_ℕ. In 29th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 183, pp. 29:1-29:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kori_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2021.29,
  author =	{Kori, Mayuko and Tsukada, Takeshi and Kobayashi, Naoki},
  title =	{{A Cyclic Proof System for HFL\underline\mathbb{N}}},
  booktitle =	{29th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2021)},
  pages =	{29:1--29:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-175-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{183},
  editor =	{Baier, Christel and Goubault-Larrecq, Jean},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2021.29},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-134632},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2021.29},
  annote =	{Keywords: Cyclic proof, higher-order logic, fixed-point logic, sequent calculus}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.19
A Probabilistic Higher-Order Fixpoint Logic

Authors: Yo Mitani, Naoki Kobayashi, and Takeshi Tsukada

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)

Abstract
We introduce PHFL, a probabilistic extension of higher-order fixpoint logic, which can also be regarded as a higher-order extension of probabilistic temporal logics such as PCTL and the μ^p-calculus. We show that PHFL is strictly more expressive than the μ^p-calculus, and that the PHFL model-checking problem for finite Markov chains is undecidable even for the μ-only, order-1 fragment of PHFL. Furthermore the full PHFL is far more expressive: we give a translation from Lubarsky’s μ-arithmetic to PHFL, which implies that PHFL model checking is Π^1₁-hard and Σ^1₁-hard. As a positive result, we characterize a decidable fragment of the PHFL model-checking problems using a novel type system.
Cite as

Yo Mitani, Naoki Kobayashi, and Takeshi Tsukada. A Probabilistic Higher-Order Fixpoint Logic. In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 19:1-19:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mitani_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.19,
  author =	{Mitani, Yo and Kobayashi, Naoki and Tsukada, Takeshi},
  title =	{{A Probabilistic Higher-Order Fixpoint Logic}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123413},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Probabilistic logics, higher-order fixpoint logic, model checking}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.21
On Average-Case Hardness of Higher-Order Model Checking

Authors: Yoshiki Nakamura, Kazuyuki Asada, Naoki Kobayashi, Ryoma Sin'ya, and Takeshi Tsukada

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)

Abstract
We study a mixture between the average case and worst case complexities of higher-order model checking, the problem of deciding whether the tree generated by a given λ Y-term (or equivalently, a higher-order recursion scheme) satisfies the property expressed by a given tree automaton. Higher-order model checking has recently been studied extensively in the context of higher-order program verification. Although the worst-case complexity of the problem is k-EXPTIME complete for order-k terms, various higher-order model checkers have been developed that run efficiently for typical inputs, and program verification tools have been constructed on top of them. One may, therefore, hope that higher-order model checking can be solved efficiently in the average case, despite the worst-case complexity. We provide a negative result, by showing that, under certain assumptions, for almost every term, the higher-order model checking problem specialized for the term is k-EXPTIME hard with respect to the size of automata. The proof is based on a novel intersection type system that characterizes terms that do not contain any useless subterms.
Cite as

Yoshiki Nakamura, Kazuyuki Asada, Naoki Kobayashi, Ryoma Sin'ya, and Takeshi Tsukada. On Average-Case Hardness of Higher-Order Model Checking. In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 21:1-21:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{nakamura_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.21,
  author =	{Nakamura, Yoshiki and Asada, Kazuyuki and Kobayashi, Naoki and Sin'ya, Ryoma and Tsukada, Takeshi},
  title =	{{On Average-Case Hardness of Higher-Order Model Checking}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123439},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Higher-order model checking, average-case complexity, intersection type system}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.32
Streett Automata Model Checking of Higher-Order Recursion Schemes

Authors: Ryota Suzuki, Koichi Fujima, Naoki Kobayashi, and Takeshi Tsukada

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 84, 2nd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2017)

Abstract
We propose a practical algorithm for Streett automata model checking of higher-order recursion schemes (HORS), which checks whether the tree generated by a given HORS is accepted by a given Streett automaton. The Streett automata model checking of HORS is useful in the context of liveness verification of higher-order functional programs. The previous approach to Streett automata model checking converted Streett automata to parity automata and then invoked a parity tree automata model checker. We show through experiments that our direct approach outperforms the previous approach. Besides being able to directly deal with Streett automata, our algorithm is the first practical Streett or parity automata model checking algorithm that runs in time polynomial in the size of HORS, assuming that the other parameters are fixed. Previous practical fixed-parameter polynomial time algorithms for HORS could only deal with the class of trivial tree automata. We have confirmed through experiments that (a parity automata version of) our model checker outperforms previous parity automata model checkers for HORS.
Cite as

Ryota Suzuki, Koichi Fujima, Naoki Kobayashi, and Takeshi Tsukada. Streett Automata Model Checking of Higher-Order Recursion Schemes. In 2nd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 84, pp. 32:1-32:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{suzuki_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.32,
  author =	{Suzuki, Ryota and Fujima, Koichi and Kobayashi, Naoki and Tsukada, Takeshi},
  title =	{{Streett Automata Model Checking of Higher-Order Recursion Schemes}},
  booktitle =	{2nd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2017)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-047-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{84},
  editor =	{Miller, Dale},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-77325},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: Higher-order model checking, higher-order recursion schemes, Streett automata}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 7 Document/PDF
  • 2 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2026
  • 1 2025
  • 2 2021
  • 2 2020
  • 1 2017

  • Refine by Author
  • 5 Tsukada, Takeshi
  • 4 Kobayashi, Naoki
  • 1 Asada, Kazuyuki
  • 1 Clairambault, Pierre
  • 1 Fujima, Koichi
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 7 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Denotational semantics
  • 1 Theory of computation → Concurrency
  • 1 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • 1 Theory of computation → Process calculi
  • 1 Theory of computation → Program verification
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Higher-order model checking
  • 1 Cyclic proof
  • 1 Denotational semantics
  • 1 Game semantics
  • 1 Probabilistic logics
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact