7 Search Results for "Urban, Josef"


Document
Automated Theorem Proving for Metamath

Authors: Mario Carneiro, Chad E. Brown, and Josef Urban

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 268, 14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023)


Abstract
Metamath is a proof assistant that keeps surprising outsiders by its combination of a very minimalist design with a large library of advanced results, ranking high on the Freek Wiedijk’s 100 list. In this work, we develop several translations of the Metamath logic and its large set-theoretical library into higher-order and first-order TPTP formats for automated theorem provers (ATPs). We show that state-of-the-art ATPs can prove 68% of the Metamath problems automatically when using the premises that were used in the human-written Metamath proofs. Finally, we add proof reconstruction and premise selection methods and combine the components into the first hammer system for Metamath.

Cite as

Mario Carneiro, Chad E. Brown, and Josef Urban. Automated Theorem Proving for Metamath. In 14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 268, pp. 9:1-9:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{carneiro_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2023.9,
  author =	{Carneiro, Mario and Brown, Chad E. and Urban, Josef},
  title =	{{Automated Theorem Proving for Metamath}},
  booktitle =	{14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-284-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{268},
  editor =	{Naumowicz, Adam and Thiemann, Ren\'{e}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-183846},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Metamath, Automated theorem proving, Interactive theorem proving, Formal proof assistants, proof discovery}
}
Document
Reimplementing Mizar in Rust

Authors: Mario Carneiro

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 268, 14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023)


Abstract
This paper describes a new open-source proof processing tool, mizar-rs, a wholesale reimplementation of core parts of the Mizar proof system, written in Rust. In particular, the "checker" and "analyzer" of Mizar are implemented, which together form the trusted core of Mizar. This is to our knowledge the first and only external implementation of these components. Thanks to the loose coupling of Mizar’s passes, it is possible to use the checker as a drop-in replacement for the original, and we have used this to verify the entire MML in 11.8 minutes on 8 cores, a 4.8× speedup over the original Pascal implementation. Since Mizar is not designed to have a small trusted core, checking Mizar proofs entails following Mizar closely, so our ability to detect bugs is limited. Nevertheless, we were able to find multiple memory errors, four soundness bugs in the original (which were not being exploited in MML), in addition to one non-critical bug which was being exploited in 46 different MML articles. We hope to use this checker as a base for proof export tooling, as well as revitalizing development of the language.

Cite as

Mario Carneiro. Reimplementing Mizar in Rust. In 14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 268, pp. 10:1-10:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{carneiro:LIPIcs.ITP.2023.10,
  author =	{Carneiro, Mario},
  title =	{{Reimplementing Mizar in Rust}},
  booktitle =	{14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-284-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{268},
  editor =	{Naumowicz, Adam and Thiemann, Ren\'{e}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-183852},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Mizar, proof checker, software, Rust}
}
Document
MizAR 60 for Mizar 50

Authors: Jan Jakubův, Karel Chvalovský, Zarathustra Goertzel, Cezary Kaliszyk, Mirek Olšák, Bartosz Piotrowski, Stephan Schulz, Martin Suda, and Josef Urban

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 268, 14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023)


Abstract
As a present to Mizar on its 50th anniversary, we develop an AI/TP system that automatically proves about 60% of the Mizar theorems in the hammer setting. We also automatically prove 75% of the Mizar theorems when the automated provers are helped by using only the premises used in the human-written Mizar proofs. We describe the methods and large-scale experiments leading to these results. This includes in particular the E and Vampire provers, their ENIGMA and Deepire learning modifications, a number of learning-based premise selection methods, and the incremental loop that interleaves growing a corpus of millions of ATP proofs with training increasingly strong AI/TP systems on them. We also present a selection of Mizar problems that were proved automatically.

Cite as

Jan Jakubův, Karel Chvalovský, Zarathustra Goertzel, Cezary Kaliszyk, Mirek Olšák, Bartosz Piotrowski, Stephan Schulz, Martin Suda, and Josef Urban. MizAR 60 for Mizar 50. In 14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 268, pp. 19:1-19:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jakubuv_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2023.19,
  author =	{Jakub\r{u}v, Jan and Chvalovsk\'{y}, Karel and Goertzel, Zarathustra and Kaliszyk, Cezary and Ol\v{s}\'{a}k, Mirek and Piotrowski, Bartosz and Schulz, Stephan and Suda, Martin and Urban, Josef},
  title =	{{MizAR 60 for Mizar 50}},
  booktitle =	{14th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2023)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-284-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{268},
  editor =	{Naumowicz, Adam and Thiemann, Ren\'{e}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-183942},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Mizar, ENIGMA, Automated Reasoning, Machine Learning}
}
Document
Proofgold: Blockchain for Formal Methods

Authors: Chad E. Brown, Cezary Kaliszyk, Thibault Gauthier, and Josef Urban

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 105, 4th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2022)


Abstract
Proofgold is a peer to peer cryptocurrency making use of formal logic. Users can publish theories and then develop a theory by publishing documents with definitions, conjectures and proofs. The blockchain records the theories and their state of development (e.g., which theorems have been proven and when). Two of the main theories are a form of classical set theory (for formalizing mathematics) and an intuitionistic theory of higher-order abstract syntax (for reasoning about syntax with binders). We have also significantly modified the open source Proofgold Core client software to create a faster, more stable and more efficient client, Proofgold Lava. Two important changes are the cryptography code and the database code, and we discuss these improvements. We also discuss how the Proofgold network can be used to support large formalization efforts.

Cite as

Chad E. Brown, Cezary Kaliszyk, Thibault Gauthier, and Josef Urban. Proofgold: Blockchain for Formal Methods. In 4th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2022). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 105, pp. 4:1-4:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{brown_et_al:OASIcs.FMBC.2022.4,
  author =	{Brown, Chad E. and Kaliszyk, Cezary and Gauthier, Thibault and Urban, Josef},
  title =	{{Proofgold: Blockchain for Formal Methods}},
  booktitle =	{4th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2022)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:15},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-250-1},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{105},
  editor =	{Dargaye, Zaynah and Schneidewind, Clara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2022.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-171851},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2022.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Formal logic, Blockchain, Proofgold}
}
Document
Seventeen Provers Under the Hammer

Authors: Martin Desharnais, Petar Vukmirović, Jasmin Blanchette, and Makarius Wenzel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 237, 13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022)


Abstract
One of the main success stories of automatic theorem provers has been their integration into proof assistants. Such integrations, or "hammers," increase proof automation and hence user productivity. In this paper, we use Isabelle/HOL’s Sledgehammer tool to find out how useful modern provers are at proving formulas in higher-order logic. Our evaluation follows in the steps of Böhme and Nipkow’s Judgment Day study from 2010, but instead of three provers we use 17, including SMT solvers and higher-order provers. Our work offers an alternative yardstick for comparing modern provers, next to the benchmarks and competitions emerging from the TPTP World and SMT-LIB.

Cite as

Martin Desharnais, Petar Vukmirović, Jasmin Blanchette, and Makarius Wenzel. Seventeen Provers Under the Hammer. In 13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 237, pp. 8:1-8:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{desharnais_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2022.8,
  author =	{Desharnais, Martin and Vukmirovi\'{c}, Petar and Blanchette, Jasmin and Wenzel, Makarius},
  title =	{{Seventeen Provers Under the Hammer}},
  booktitle =	{13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-252-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{237},
  editor =	{Andronick, June and de Moura, Leonardo},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2022.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-167178},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2022.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Automatic theorem proving, interactive theorem proving, proof assistants}
}
Document
The Isabelle ENIGMA

Authors: Zarathustra A. Goertzel, Jan Jakubův, Cezary Kaliszyk, Miroslav Olšák, Jelle Piepenbrock, and Josef Urban

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 237, 13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022)


Abstract
We significantly improve the performance of the E automated theorem prover on the Isabelle Sledgehammer problems by combining learning and theorem proving in several ways. In particular, we develop targeted versions of the ENIGMA guidance for the Isabelle problems, targeted versions of neural premise selection, and targeted strategies for E. The methods are trained in several iterations over hundreds of thousands untyped and typed first-order problems extracted from Isabelle. Our final best single-strategy ENIGMA and premise selection system improves the best previous version of E by 25.3% in 15 seconds, outperforming also all other previous ATP and SMT systems.

Cite as

Zarathustra A. Goertzel, Jan Jakubův, Cezary Kaliszyk, Miroslav Olšák, Jelle Piepenbrock, and Josef Urban. The Isabelle ENIGMA. In 13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 237, pp. 16:1-16:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{goertzel_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2022.16,
  author =	{Goertzel, Zarathustra A. and Jakub\r{u}v, Jan and Kaliszyk, Cezary and Ol\v{s}\'{a}k, Miroslav and Piepenbrock, Jelle and Urban, Josef},
  title =	{{The Isabelle ENIGMA}},
  booktitle =	{13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-252-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{237},
  editor =	{Andronick, June and de Moura, Leonardo},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2022.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-167253},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2022.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: E Prover, ENIGMA, Premise Selection, Isabelle/Sledgehammer}
}
Document
Short Paper
Hammering Mizar by Learning Clause Guidance (Short Paper)

Authors: Jan Jakubův and Josef Urban

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 141, 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)


Abstract
We describe a very large improvement of existing hammer-style proof automation over large ITP libraries by combining learning and theorem proving. In particular, we have integrated state-of-the-art machine learners into the E automated theorem prover, and developed methods that allow learning and efficient internal guidance of E over the whole Mizar library. The resulting trained system improves the real-time performance of E on the Mizar library by 70% in a single-strategy setting.

Cite as

Jan Jakubův and Josef Urban. Hammering Mizar by Learning Clause Guidance (Short Paper). In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 34:1-34:8, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jakubuv_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.34,
  author =	{Jakub\r{u}v, Jan and Urban, Josef},
  title =	{{Hammering Mizar by Learning Clause Guidance}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:8},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110898},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: Proof automation, ITP hammers, Automated theorem proving, Machine learning}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 5 Urban, Josef
  • 3 Jakubův, Jan
  • 3 Kaliszyk, Cezary
  • 2 Brown, Chad E.
  • 2 Carneiro, Mario
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 5 Theory of computation → Automated reasoning
  • 2 Computing methodologies → Theorem proving algorithms
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Machine learning
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Mathematical software performance
  • 1 Social and professional topics → Systems analysis and design
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Automated theorem proving
  • 2 ENIGMA
  • 2 Mizar
  • 1 Automated Reasoning
  • 1 Automatic theorem proving
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 7 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 3 2022
  • 3 2023
  • 1 2019

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail