Functional Representation of Technical Artefacts in Ontology-Terminology Models

Author Laura Giacomini



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

OASIcs.LDK.2019.5.pdf
  • Filesize: 382 kB
  • 6 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Laura Giacomini
  • University of Hildesheim, Germany
  • University of Heidelberg, Germany

Cite AsGet BibTex

Laura Giacomini. Functional Representation of Technical Artefacts in Ontology-Terminology Models. In 2nd Conference on Language, Data and Knowledge (LDK 2019). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 70, pp. 5:1-5:6, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)
https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.LDK.2019.5

Abstract

The ontological coverage of technical artefacts in terminography should take into account a functional representation of conceptual information. We present a model for a function-based description which enables direct interfacing of ontological properties and terminology, and which was developed in the context of a project on term variation in technical texts. Starting from related research in the field of knowledge engineering, we introduce the components of the ontological function macrocategory and discuss the implementation of the model in lemon.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Information systems → Ontologies
Keywords
  • terminology
  • ontology
  • technical artefact
  • function model
  • semantic web
  • lemon

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Muhammad N. Asim, Muhammad Wasim, Muhammad U. G. Khan, Waqar Mahmood, and Hafiza M. Abbasi. A survey of ontology learning techniques and applications. Database, 2018(1), 2018. Google Scholar
  2. Stefano Borgo, Riichiro Mizoguchi, and Yoshinobu Kitamura. Formalizing and Adapting a General Function Module for Foundational Ontologies. In FOIS, pages 241-254, 2016. Google Scholar
  3. Pamela Faber. A cognitive linguistics view of terminology and specialized language, volume 20. Walter de Gruyter, 2012. Google Scholar
  4. Charles J. Fillmore. Frame semantics. Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings, 34:373-400, 2006. Google Scholar
  5. Laura Giacomini. An Ontology-terminology Model for Designing Technical e-dictionaries: Formalisation and Presentation of Variational Data. In Electronic lexicography in the 21st century: Proceedings of eLex 2017 conference, pages 110-123. Lexical Computing, 2017. Google Scholar
  6. Laura Giacomini. Frame-based Lexicography: Presenting Multiword Terms in a Technical E-dictionary. In Proceedings of the XVIII EURALEX International Congress, 2018. Google Scholar
  7. Dagmar Gromann and Thierry Declerck. Comparing Pretrained Multilingual Word Embeddings on an Ontology Alignment Task. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2018), 2018. Google Scholar
  8. Julie Hirtz, Robert B. Stone, Daniel A. McAdams, Simon Szykman, and Kristin L. Wood. A functional basis for engineering design: reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Research in engineering Design, 13(2):65-82, 2002. Google Scholar
  9. Wybo Houkes and Anthonie Meijers. The ontology of artefacts: the hard problem. Studies in history and philosophy of science part A, 37(1):118-131, 2006. Google Scholar
  10. John McCrae, Dennis Spohr, and Philipp Cimiano. Linking lexical resources and ontologies on the semantic web with lemon. In Extended Semantic Web Conference, pages 245-259. Springer, 2011. Google Scholar
  11. Riichiro Mizoguchi, Yoshinobu Kitamura, and Stefano Borgo. A unifying definition for artifact and biological functions. Applied Ontology, 11(2):129-154, 2016. Google Scholar
  12. E. Motta, N. Shadbolt, and A. Stutt. Engineering Knowledge in the Age of the Semantic Web: Proceedings. In 14th International Conference, EKAW, pages 5-8, 2004. Google Scholar
  13. Jacquelyn K.S. Nagel, Robert B. Stone, and Daniel A. McAdams. An engineering-to-biology thesaurus for engineering design. In ASME 2010 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, pages 117-128. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2010. Google Scholar
  14. Pieter E. Vermaas and Wybo Houkes. Technical functions: a drawbridge between the intentional and structural natures of technical artefacts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 37(1):5-18, 2006. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail